Mail

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
desiree.capuano@gmail.com
japendletonjr@gmail.com
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: G***** summer visitation 2015
From: Desiree Capuano <desiree.capuano@gmail.com>
To: Patrick <patrick@desireecapuano.com>
Date: Mon, May 11 2015 11:38:43 am
and you are incapable of having a conversation without a dictionary,
encyclopedia, and case law book for reference.

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Patrick 
wrote:

>  It is not my fault that you are consistently and perpetually wrong.
> Also, most of the time your arguments make no sense.
>
> Little old ladies are not a race - therefore, you cannot be "racist"
> against them.  You can be prejudiced against them.  Racism is a specific
> form of prejudice, based on race.  You see: you are incapable of expressing
> your thoughts coherently.
>
> Patrick
>
> On 05/11/2015 11:12 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>
> See Richard, it doesn't matter what I say or how I say it.  You are bound
> and determined to argue everything I say and you adamantly refuse to even
> attempt to understand what I'm talking about.  So tell me why I should try
> and defend myself against a person like that.  It's a futile effort and I
> have better things to do.  You knit-pick like a little old lady (Oh my god
> - are you going to say that I'm not racist against little old ladies???)
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Patrick 
> wrote:
>
>>  Which events?  And how am I disturbed and isolated in my understanding
>> of them? And what exactly does "in your understanding of" mean?
>>
>> You seem to be completely incapable of expressing your thoughts
>> articulately.  You use so many vague terms, and incorrect words.  I know
>> that you have a reasonable vocabulary, so it's not that you don't
>> understand the words individually.  But you seem to have difficulty
>> combining those words into meaningful sentences to coherently state the
>> thoughts that are in your mind.  Years of THC consumption, I guess.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>> On 05/11/2015 10:57 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>
>> ...in your understanding...(did you not read that part?)
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Patrick 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  Desiree:
>>>
>>> Noted.
>>>
>>> Claims which do not include a logical or rational basis (such as the one
>>> provided below, that I am "disturbed and isolated") are meaningless.
>>> Please provide the basis for such a claim.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/11/2015 10:38 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>
>>>         You are completely disturbed and isolated in your understanding
>>> of events...but I'm used to.  I understand that you feel you have no fault
>>> or guilt for anything that has transpired.
>>>
>>>  That said, if you plan on waiting until June to get his plane ticket,
>>> I expect that you will NOT whine and complain about how much it will cost
>>> to get him a direct flight from Vancouver to Phoenix and that the flight
>>> will be on either Saturday or Sunday and not on a weekday.  I just did the
>>> search and the flights are currently $312 (US)
>>>
>>> http://www.kayak.com/flights/YVR-PHX/2015-07-12
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Patrick 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  When I purchase it.  Probably some time in June.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/07/2015 04:37 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Now - when will I have G*****'s return flight information?
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Desiree Capuano 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Would you like me to forward you the email thread where I purchased a
>>>>> ticket and it interferes with your work schedule so you denied it?  Or the
>>>>> one where I told you flights were cheaper on a different day and you
>>>>> responded that you didn't care about my financial troubles and it wasn't
>>>>> your fault that I was a white-trash person incapable of budgeting my money
>>>>> - and again denied it?  Oh - but you probably have them up on your website,
>>>>> so you can just go there and read it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Desiree Capuano 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, you interfered with almost EVERY visitation I had with
>>>>> G*****; from pulling stupid things like refusing to put him on the plane,
>>>>> calling the airlines and changing the plane tickets yourself, filing for a
>>>>> restraining order the day prior to visitation, to sending him for a week
>>>>> with nothing but the clothes on his back and a box of Jewish crackers.  You
>>>>> and he decided that he would not participate in any event over Christmas
>>>>> break (including eating dinner) because he was 'Jewish' and it was against
>>>>> his religion.  You sure as hell never permitted me to have him for a
>>>>> visitation without return plans solidified.  I believe I have been
>>>>> extremely accommodating to you, given the hardship you caused me while you
>>>>> had partial custody.   Where's your argument again?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> Get this through your fucking head: Fuck you!  I will not bow down to
>>>>> your ridiculous requirements.  I have provided you G*****'s flight
>>>>> information and that is all I am going to do.  If you had a history of
>>>>> being reasonable and civilized then I might be more accommodating, but you
>>>>> don't!  Your history is filled with backstabbing, lying, forcing people to
>>>>> do what you want, throwing fits when you don't get your way, and doing
>>>>> things that harm innocent bystanders just to get what you want.
>>>>>
>>>>> You cannot claim to be concerned about G*****'s well being or safety
>>>>> when he's been with you for over 2 years and you've not fulfilled any of
>>>>> your parental obligations to him.  You have no concern for his well being
>>>>> and safety UNTIL it comes to his visitation with me.  You allowed
>>>>> Kristopher to take him along while he was high out of his fucking mind on
>>>>> meth, committing crimes, yet you pretend to be concerned about his safety
>>>>> with me?  Get a fucking clue you stupid bitch!  You keep drugs in the home
>>>>> and you fill his head with your racist, anti-immigrant bullshit, but you
>>>>> say I'm cause for concern?
>>>>>
>>>>> As I've said, this discussion is done!  I dare you to not let G*****
>>>>> catch his flights on May 24th and May 28th.  When G***** was in my custody
>>>>> did I EVER attempt to interfere with your visits?  NO, I did not!
>>>>>
>>>>> Get it through your thick fucking skull that parental visitation is
>>>>> NOT for the parent's benefit!!!  How fucking narcissistic are you that you
>>>>> cannot see that?  Do you really think that you're hurting me by doing
>>>>> this?  I WANT you to refuse to allow G***** to visit so that he despises
>>>>> you that much more.  Do you think he believes the bullshit excuses that you
>>>>> tell him to justify your actions?  He, and everyone, sees through your
>>>>> shit.  Do you think he bought your crap about "just doing your patriotic
>>>>> duty" by calling ICE?  Or your lame excuse that you keep calling me Ricky
>>>>> because that's the name on our court cases?
>>>>>
>>>>> The only thing that is agitating me about what you do is that I don't
>>>>> want G***** to have the same shitting childhood that I had, but you're
>>>>> going out of your way to make sure he does.  All the shit you do is the
>>>>> same shit that my mother did.  And the end result for her is that I
>>>>> despised her and had nothing to do with her after I left home.  The same
>>>>> thing you're doing to G*****.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now fuck off and go bother someone else.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/07/2015 11:01 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me try this again.  You have provided the details of G*****'s
>>>>> travel to Canada.  You have yet to provide the details of him travel from
>>>>> Canada to Phoenix.  While I am uncomfortable with him departing without a
>>>>> return ticket purchased, I will allow it if you provide the date to which
>>>>> you will purchase his return ticket and provide me with the details of said
>>>>> flight.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Are you refusing to
>>>>> A. Purchase a return flight for G***** prior to his departure or
>>>>> B. Provide me with a date that I can expect to receive the flight
>>>>> information for his return?
>>>>>
>>>>>  Please be very clear in your response.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Desiree Capuano 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You believe the court will accept half of a vacation travel plan as
>>>>> "reasonable"?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that we agree on the definitions of "full" and "itinerary", then
>>>>> does that mean that you acknowledge that a "full itinerary"  would include
>>>>> a detailed account, including times of arrival and departure of each
>>>>> location (not just the airports) the traveller will be during the trip?
>>>>> That is, after all, a "full itinerary".  That is what I was trying to
>>>>> explain to you previously when you were refusing to clarify what you meant
>>>>> by "full itinerary".  You eventually stated that you just required the
>>>>> flight information.  You are now completely contradicting what you said
>>>>> previously, and agreeing to what I was saying - which you had previously
>>>>> accused me of playing word games over.
>>>>>
>>>>> Flip-flop?  You just argue whatever point serves your purpose at any
>>>>> moment, huh?  Even when it completely contradicts the points you made
>>>>> yesterday?
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, I'm not playing along.  I've provided you G*****'s flight
>>>>> information from PHX to LAX, and from LAX to YVR.  That is all you're
>>>>> getting.  Even that is more than the court would require and it meets the
>>>>> definition of "reasonable".
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, I don't have time for your nonsense today.  As far as I'm
>>>>> concerned, this discussion is done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/07/2015 09:34 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  April 26th
>>>>> ...I will require a *full *itinerary for G*****'s summer trip.
>>>>>
>>>>>  May 4th
>>>>>  I will need the travel plans (itinerary) *all *flights G***** will
>>>>> be occupying
>>>>>
>>>>>  May 5th
>>>>> The above visitation as previously stated ALSO is contingent upon a *full
>>>>> *travel itinerary including all flight and travel plans.
>>>>>
>>>>>  The term '*full*' means (from dictionary.reference.com):
>>>>>
>>>>>  adjective, fuller, fullest.
>>>>> 1. completely filled; containing all that can be held; filled to
>>>>> utmost capacity
>>>>> 2. complete; entire; maximum:
>>>>> 3. of the maximum size, amount, extent, volume, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>  The term '*all*' means (from dictionary.reference.com):
>>>>>  adjective
>>>>> 1.the whole of (used in referring to quantity, extent, or duration):
>>>>> 2. the whole number of (used in referring to individuals or
>>>>> particulars, taken collectively):
>>>>> 3. the greatest possible (used in referring to quality or degree):
>>>>> 4. every:
>>>>> 5. any; any whatever:
>>>>> 6. nothing but; only:
>>>>> 7. dominated by or as if by the conspicuous possession or use of a
>>>>> particular feature:
>>>>>
>>>>>  So you see - I did require ALL travel itineraries.  However, if you
>>>>> are having money issues,  I understand.  If you do not have the funds
>>>>> available to secure a return flight from Vancouver to Phoenix on July 12th
>>>>> prior to his departure, then tell me the exact date to which you will
>>>>> provide G*****'s return flight itinerary.  That date will serve as the
>>>>> deadline for this action item.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Patrick >>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  So no comment on the turning 16 thing?  Didn't think so.  You didn't
>>>>> realize that when you set this course of action in motion, did you?  You
>>>>> didn't even stop to consider what the consequences of your actions would
>>>>> be, did you?
>>>>>
>>>>> You had no idea that the legal age to be independent of your parents,
>>>>> in Ontario, was 16.  And that by G***** receiving Canadian citizenship
>>>>> that it meant that on his 16th birthday he could walk out your door and
>>>>> never, ever have to see or speak to you ever again, huh?  And the best part
>>>>> is that if, before he turns 18, he steps outside of Ontario THEN at that
>>>>> moment you have the legal authority to have him brought back to you by
>>>>> force.  But as long as he's in Ontario there's not a damn thing you, or any
>>>>> US law enforcement agency, or any US court can do about it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, if he was a US citizen and NOT also a Canadian citizen, THEN the
>>>>> Canadian authorities would have to send him back to the US.  But as long as
>>>>> he has Canadian citizenship (which he now has for the rest of his life
>>>>> (thanks to you for setting things in motion), and he's over the age of 16,
>>>>> he can live on his own, have his own apartment, get his own firearms
>>>>> license, his own driver's license.  And he won't need anyone's permission
>>>>> to do so.
>>>>>
>>>>> And, by the time he turns 16, next year, what he will remember is
>>>>> things like you refusing to allow him to visit and refusing to provide a
>>>>> decent reason why.  You taking away his property (like video game consoles)
>>>>> because you say "it's not fair to Sage".  You taking him, by force, from
>>>>> Liz and forcing him to live in Arizona.  You refusing to let him have
>>>>> things he, as a child with parents with a combined income over $200,000,
>>>>> should have.  You refusing to take him to the doctor for regular check
>>>>> ups.  You refusing to have the anomaly in in his eye checked.  You calling
>>>>> ICE on his father and having him deported for no justifiable reason, other
>>>>> than to get custody of him by default.  You never bothering to teach him
>>>>> things about life.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was really hoping to surprise you with this on September 28, 2016,
>>>>> but I guess the cat's out of the bag now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you ever get tired of being the perpetual loser?  You ever think to
>>>>> yourself "what's the point"?  Ever seem to you that maybe life is just to
>>>>> fucking hard and there's no point because we're all gonna die in the end
>>>>> anyway?  If not, well, that's too bad - the world is going to be a better
>>>>> place when you are no longer in it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good evening,
>>>>> Desiree
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 07:34 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Please provide me with your hotel information.  I will make sure I am
>>>>> available for the "pick up" schedule.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> Either your English skills are horrendous or you really do think of
>>>>> your offspring as possessions?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am planning to accompany G***** to the Vancouver International
>>>>> Airport on or before July 12, 2015, and being present with him until he
>>>>> passes through the security checkpoint.  I cannot force him to do anything
>>>>> past that point.  I also have no intention of, as you say, "returning him".
>>>>>
>>>>> G***** is a human being, not a possession.  Neither you, nor I have
>>>>> the power to force him to do something against his will.  All I can, and
>>>>> will, do is make every reasonable effort to ensure he is at the airport in
>>>>> time to board his return flight.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why would you even ask such a stupid question?  I mean, if I was
>>>>> intending to do something like abscond with G***** do you think I would
>>>>> admit it beforehand?  And if that was my intention, why would I bother
>>>>> going through all this stupid shit with you?  Why wouldn't I just go to
>>>>> Phoenix and pick him up?  What?  Do you think it's impossible for me to
>>>>> walk right into the US?  Do you think they scrutinize me every time I cross
>>>>> the border?  My god, there is no end to your stupidity, is there?
>>>>>
>>>>> And besides, what do you really care?  You only have, at most, another
>>>>> 16 months until you have absolutely no legal authority over him, anyway.
>>>>> Yeah, that's right, the day he turns 16 and his foot touches the ground in
>>>>> the Province of Ontario he is a legal adult and cannot be forced to return
>>>>> to his parents - because he now has Canadian citizenship - because of
>>>>> *YOUR* actions.  I don't even need to be in Canada myself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 06:46 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you planning on returning G*****?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> I cannot imagine why you would hear that because I never said that.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will tell you this, unequivocally: Since you did not require I
>>>>> provide the return flight information in order to allow G***** to travel
>>>>> from Phoenix to Los Angeles on May 24, 2015, then from Los Angeles to
>>>>> Vancouver on May 28, 2015, and you only brought that up AFTER I purchased
>>>>> the tickets, then NO!  I absolutely will not purchase his return ticket
>>>>> until I know he is actually going to be present in Vancouver.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no history of backing out of commitments, or saying completely
>>>>> false stuff to get what I want.  You do!  You are the one that cannot be
>>>>> trusted, not me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, our dealings here are done.  I have fulfilled the requirements
>>>>> you stated in writing.  You are now attempting to change those requirements
>>>>> by adding new requirements.  It is not going to happen!  I don't believe
>>>>> there is anything further for us to discuss between now and when G*****
>>>>> arrives here on May 28, 2015.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have posted all of our emails from today onto your wonderful website
>>>>> so there is a public record of all of your words.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good day,
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 06:35 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So, what I hear is that you will send me the details of his return
>>>>> itinerary before he travels on the 24th of May?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to point out that that was NOT one of your stated
>>>>> requirements.  I told G***** that this is what you would do: you'll make
>>>>> up a bunch of requirements then, if I meet those requirements, you'll add
>>>>> more requirements, and if I meet those you'll just keep adding more.  Same
>>>>> shit my mother used to do to my father.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, it ain't gonna happen.  I met your requirements and I'm just
>>>>> dying for you to fuck up enough that the court will consider your behavior
>>>>> egregious.  So far you've:
>>>>> - refused to allow G***** to visit during one extended school break;
>>>>> - taken away his phone, cutting off all communication between him and
>>>>> I for an extended duration of time, without providing me any notice;
>>>>> - taken away his debit card so I cannot provide him financial support;
>>>>> - refused to provide him even the minimal level of medical care that
>>>>> the California legislature mandates;
>>>>> - continued to keep drugs in the home.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, go ahead, refuse to let him visit over the summer.  Give me a
>>>>> reason that the court will consider justifiable to take away not only your
>>>>> custody but also visitation.  And keep giving G***** reasons to resent
>>>>> you.  Regardless of what the court does, the important thing is that
>>>>> G***** grows to hate you and you are doing an excellent job of pushing him
>>>>> in that direction.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 05:58 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If I do not have a travel itinerary for G*****'s return flight to
>>>>> Phoenix on July 12th, 2015 then he will not board a plan to travel
>>>>> anywhere.  Are you still unclear as to my meaning?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  I cannot possibly answer that question.  I suspect what you mean to
>>>>> ask is not actually what you asked.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 05:44 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for the itineraries.  When can I expect one for his return
>>>>> trip?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> At least my insults to you are based in reality.  Surely, you're not
>>>>> trying to suggest that you're intellectually superior to me.  I believe our
>>>>> many debates via email show that not to be true.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:46 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Funny but "stupid fucking cunt" looks nothing like a travel
>>>>> itinerary...maybe you're confused again.  Do you need me to copy and paste
>>>>> an example for you??
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Sorry, I meant to say "stupid fucking cunt".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:38 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure...as soon as you send me a travel itinerary.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you stop being a stupid fucking for even just a minute?
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:31 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You're right, I didn't call every single airline to check their age
>>>>> limitations for you.  Did you need me to do all of the research for you?
>>>>> Do you need me to hold your hand through this whole process??
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, and if he can be at PHX by 4:30am then there's a 6:37am flight
>>>>> on Air Canada for $395, with a 2:15 layover in San Fran, for a total travel
>>>>> time of 6:50; or there's a couple of 6:11am Air Canadas for $463 with 2
>>>>> stops for a travel time of 10:17 and 11:47, respectively; or a 1:43 with
>>>>> one layover in Denver for $559, travel time: 7:26.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you do everything half-assed?  Can you just go away and shut up?  I
>>>>> don't believe that there is ANY way that your involvement in something
>>>>> would ever make it better so why don't you just go to your room and smoke
>>>>> some weed or something?
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:15 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Air Canada allows it at 12 - I already called them.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you realize that many airlines now do not let a person under 15
>>>>> travel alone?  Do you realize how that limits the number of flights
>>>>> available to choose from?  Do you ever look into things before you speak?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am calling airlines right now.  If I am able to secure a ticket I
>>>>> will let you know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:09 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would assume with all that free time on your hands you would be able
>>>>> to secure G***** a plane ticket, yet I don't have a travel itinerary.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> Last night I sent you an email requesting what you will permit with
>>>>> respect to layover duration, et cetera.  Why, when I request clarification
>>>>> of anything from you, do you always refuse to provide it?  You refuse to be
>>>>> clear - even when the other party explicitly requests clarification - and
>>>>> then later you try to accuse the other party of "misinterpreting" what you
>>>>> meant.  Maybe if you used the English language correctly clarification
>>>>> would not be necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 02:23 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Once again - I don't see a travel itinerary.  Do you want to keep
>>>>> talking or do you want to see your son?  Are you seriously suggesting you
>>>>> would book G***** on a 15 hour flight?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>