Mail

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
desiree.capuano@gmail.com
japendletonjr@gmail.com
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: More of what I know
From: Desiree Capuano <desiree.capuano@gmail.com>
To: Patrick <patrick@desireecapuano.com>
Date: Mon, May 11 2015 11:30:05 am
Oh, so in this case dictionary.com isn't good enough because it would make
you wrong about something right?  I get it.

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Patrick 
wrote:

>  Desiree:
>
> You're incorrect (again).  Annoyance is not an emotion.  It is a mental
> state characterized by irritation and distraction.  Annoyance can lead to
> frustration and anger (anger can be considered an emotion).  Annoyance is a
> potential cause of an emotion (or emotional state) - it is not, itself, an
> emotion.  For more information you can refer to
>
>    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annoyance
>
> But you bring up a good point:  you insistence that "annoyance" is an
> emotion, when it's actually the *cause* (or more specifically, catalyst)
> of an emotional response, is unequivocal proof that you are incapable of
> distinguishing a cause from an effect - just as I had stated you are, a few
> days ago.  Thank you for proving my point.
>
> I also point out that the term "feeling" uses, in it's definition, the
> term "emotion", which uses in it's definition, the term "feeling".  That is
> a circular reference.  You do know what a circular reference is, right?
> You do understand that if two terms (whether in diction or in math) depend
> on each other such that they create a circular reference then neither term
> can ever actually be resolved.  Wasn't logic covered in your bachelors
> curriculum?
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
> On 05/11/2015 10:59 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>
> Oh but you can't possibly be annoyed Richard...annoyance is an emotion...
>
>  (from http://dictionary.reference.com)
>
>  annoyance
> [uh-noi-uh ns]
> Spell Syllables
> Examples Word Origin
> noun
> 1. a person or thing that annoys; nuisance:
> 2. an act or instance of annoying.
> *3. the feeling of being annoyed.*
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Patrick 
> wrote:
>
>>  Desiree:
>>
>> Admittedly, yes, I am quickly annoyed by stupidity.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>> On 05/11/2015 10:40 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>
>> oh, don't you know?  I'm trying to play right into your plan of turning
>> G***** against me by showing him how you never get annoyed..."Why is it
>> that you don't just shut up and fuck off"  - clearly not annoyed.
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Patrick 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  Desiree:
>>>
>>> If your position is that you are going to allow G***** to visit and
>>> there's nothing I can do to make you refuse to allow him to visit, then why
>>> are we even having all of this communication?  Why is it that you don't
>>> just shut up and fuck off, and let that be the end of it?  On my end, the
>>> purpose of the communication revolves around G***** being able to come to
>>> Vancouver for part of the summer so that I can fulfill my duties to him as
>>> his father.  You seem to be arguing about the same thing, however now
>>> you're saying that you're going to allow him to come and there's nothing I
>>> can do to make you NOT allow it.
>>>
>>> So, what the fuck are we talking for then?  If you're going to allow
>>> G***** to visit then there is nothing further for us to say to each
>>> other.  Anything I could possibly want to say to or about you I'd rather
>>> post on your web site, anyway.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2015 04:27 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh you little man.  I don't fear you or G***** opinion of me.  I am
>>> also not preventing visitation.  Try as you might to get me to say 'no' I
>>> will not do it.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Patrick  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Desiree:
>>>>
>>>> By the way, I know you don't deal well with reality, so I don't expect
>>>> you to respond sincerely to these most recent messages.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/07/2015 01:07 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> I also know that you don't want to let G***** visit with me because
>>>>> you know that when he visits we bond more and that puts more distance
>>>>> "emotionally" between you and him; yet you don't want to explicitly refuse
>>>>> to let him visit because you know that he will resent you for it.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, you're trying to create a situation whereby you can say it was
>>>>> because of me that he couldn't visit.  But I've explained to him that my
>>>>> mother used to do the same stuff when I was a kid.  That my father
>>>>> eventually stopped coming to visit and I learned later in life that it was
>>>>> because of the games my mother would play - the same stuff you're doing
>>>>> right now.
>>>>>
>>>>> As always, your scheme won't work.  The only way it could would be if
>>>>> you completely cut off communication between G***** and I and made it so
>>>>> he could only hear your version of events.  But there's no way you can do
>>>>> that without grossly upsetting the court and G*****.  And your versions of
>>>>> events always rely on the listener's pity and sense of guilt.  Eventually,
>>>>> people get tired of hearing about how someone is always such a victim
>>>>> because in reality most of the problems in our lives are the result of our
>>>>> own actions and the only people that don't realize that are the ones that
>>>>> are always trying to blame others for their problems - people like you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>