Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: More of what I know
From: Patrick <>
To: Desiree Capuano <>
Date: Mon, May 11 2015 11:23:29 am

You're incorrect (again).  Annoyance is not an emotion.  It is a mental 
state characterized by irritation and distraction.  Annoyance can lead 
to frustration and anger (anger can be considered an emotion).  
Annoyance is a potential cause of an emotion (or emotional state) - it 
is not, itself, an emotion.  For more information you can refer to

But you bring up a good point:  you insistence that "annoyance" is an 
emotion, when it's actually the *cause* (or more specifically, catalyst) 
of an emotional response, is unequivocal proof that you are incapable of 
distinguishing a cause from an effect - just as I had stated you are, a 
few days ago.  Thank you for proving my point.

I also point out that the term "feeling" uses, in it's definition, the 
term "emotion", which uses in it's definition, the term "feeling".  That 
is a circular reference.  You do know what a circular reference is, 
right?  You do understand that if two terms (whether in diction or in 
math) depend on each other such that they create a circular reference 
then neither term can ever actually be resolved.  Wasn't logic covered 
in your bachelors curriculum?


On 05/11/2015 10:59 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
> Oh but you can't possibly be annoyed Richard...annoyance is an emotion...
> (from
> annoyance
> [uh-noi-uh ns]
> Spell Syllables
> Examples Word Origin
> noun
> 1. a person or thing that annoys; nuisance:
> 2. an act or instance of annoying.
> *3. the feeling of being annoyed.*
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Patrick 
> > wrote:
>     Desiree:
>     Admittedly, yes, I am quickly annoyed by stupidity.
>     Patrick
>     On 05/11/2015 10:40 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>     oh, don't you know?  I'm trying to play right into your plan of
>>     turning G***** against me by showing him how you never get
>>     annoyed..."Why is it that you don't just shut up and fuck off"  -
>>     clearly not annoyed.
>>     On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Patrick
>>     > wrote:
>>         Desiree:
>>         If your position is that you are going to allow G***** to
>>         visit and there's nothing I can do to make you refuse to
>>         allow him to visit, then why are we even having all of this
>>         communication?  Why is it that you don't just shut up and
>>         fuck off, and let that be the end of it?  On my end, the
>>         purpose of the communication revolves around G***** being
>>         able to come to Vancouver for part of the summer so that I
>>         can fulfill my duties to him as his father.  You seem to be
>>         arguing about the same thing, however now you're saying that
>>         you're going to allow him to come and there's nothing I can
>>         do to make you NOT allow it.
>>         So, what the fuck are we talking for then? If you're going to
>>         allow G***** to visit then there is nothing further for us
>>         to say to each other.  Anything I could possibly want to say
>>         to or about you I'd rather post on your web site, anyway.
>>         Patrick
>>         On 05/07/2015 04:27 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>         Oh you little man.  I don't fear you or G***** opinion of
>>>         me.  I am also not preventing visitation.  Try as you might
>>>         to get me to say 'no' I will not do it.
>>>         On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Patrick
>>>         >
>>>         wrote:
>>>             Desiree:
>>>             By the way, I know you don't deal well with reality, so
>>>             I don't expect you to respond sincerely to these most
>>>             recent messages.
>>>             Patrick
>>>             On 05/07/2015 01:07 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>                 Desiree:
>>>                 I also know that you don't want to let G***** visit
>>>                 with me because you know that when he visits we bond
>>>                 more and that puts more distance "emotionally"
>>>                 between you and him; yet you don't want to
>>>                 explicitly refuse to let him visit because you know
>>>                 that he will resent you for it.
>>>                 So, you're trying to create a situation whereby you
>>>                 can say it was because of me that he couldn't
>>>                 visit.  But I've explained to him that my mother
>>>                 used to do the same stuff when I was a kid.  That my
>>>                 father eventually stopped coming to visit and I
>>>                 learned later in life that it was because of the
>>>                 games my mother would play - the same stuff you're
>>>                 doing right now.
>>>                 As always, your scheme won't work.  The only way it
>>>                 could would be if you completely cut off
>>>                 communication between G***** and I and made it so
>>>                 he could only hear your version of events.  But
>>>                 there's no way you can do that without grossly
>>>                 upsetting the court and G*****.  And your versions
>>>                 of events always rely on the listener's pity and
>>>                 sense of guilt.  Eventually, people get tired of
>>>                 hearing about how someone is always such a victim
>>>                 because in reality most of the problems in our lives
>>>                 are the result of our own actions and the only
>>>                 people that don't realize that are the ones that are
>>>                 always trying to blame others for their problems -
>>>                 people like you.
>>>                 Patrick