Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: More of what I know
From: Patrick <>
To: Desiree Capuano <>
Date: Thu, May 07 2015 6:42:25 pm
Yesterday, in your email timestamped 5:58pm, you stated:

    "If I do not have a travel itinerary for G*****'s return flight to
    Phoenix on July 12th, 2015 then he will not board a plan to travel
    anywhere.  Are you still unclear as to my meaning?"

That seems pretty clear to me that you are saying if I do not provide 
G*****'s return flight information then you will not allow him to 
travel and, hence you will not allow him to visit.

Now you seem to be saying that no matter what I do you will not "say 
'no'", by which I assume you mean about allowing him to visit.  So, what 
you're saying today completely contradicts what you said yesterday.

Once again, you have defeated yourself!

I don't believe I said you had any concern for my or G*****'s opinion 
of you.  I don't believe you care about anyone's opinion of you because 
you're far to self absorbed for that.  And G***** and I believe in 
things like accountability, which is completely contrary to your view of 


On 05/07/2015 04:27 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
> Oh you little man.  I don't fear you or G***** opinion of me.  I am 
> also not preventing visitation.  Try as you might to get me to say 
> 'no' I will not do it.
> On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Patrick  > wrote:
>     Desiree:
>     By the way, I know you don't deal well with reality, so I don't
>     expect you to respond sincerely to these most recent messages.
>     Patrick
>     On 05/07/2015 01:07 PM, Patrick wrote:
>         Desiree:
>         I also know that you don't want to let G***** visit with me
>         because you know that when he visits we bond more and that
>         puts more distance "emotionally" between you and him; yet you
>         don't want to explicitly refuse to let him visit because you
>         know that he will resent you for it.
>         So, you're trying to create a situation whereby you can say it
>         was because of me that he couldn't visit.  But I've explained
>         to him that my mother used to do the same stuff when I was a
>         kid.  That my father eventually stopped coming to visit and I
>         learned later in life that it was because of the games my
>         mother would play - the same stuff you're doing right now.
>         As always, your scheme won't work.  The only way it could
>         would be if you completely cut off communication between
>         G***** and I and made it so he could only hear your version
>         of events.  But there's no way you can do that without grossly
>         upsetting the court and G*****.  And your versions of events
>         always rely on the listener's pity and sense of guilt.
>         Eventually, people get tired of hearing about how someone is
>         always such a victim because in reality most of the problems
>         in our lives are the result of our own actions and the only
>         people that don't realize that are the ones that are always
>         trying to blame others for their problems - people like you.
>         Patrick