Mail

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
desiree.capuano@gmail.com
japendletonjr@gmail.com
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: G***** summer visitation 2015
From: Desiree Capuano <desiree.capuano@gmail.com>
To: Patrick <patrick@desireecapuano.com>
Date: Wed, May 06 2015 7:34:02 pm
Please provide me with your hotel information.  I will make sure I am
available for the "pick up" schedule.

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  wrote:

>  Desiree:
>
> Either your English skills are horrendous or you really do think of your
> offspring as possessions?
>
> I am planning to accompany G***** to the Vancouver International Airport
> on or before July 12, 2015, and being present with him until he passes
> through the security checkpoint.  I cannot force him to do anything past
> that point.  I also have no intention of, as you say, "returning him".
>
> G***** is a human being, not a possession.  Neither you, nor I have the
> power to force him to do something against his will.  All I can, and will,
> do is make every reasonable effort to ensure he is at the airport in time
> to board his return flight.
>
> Why would you even ask such a stupid question?  I mean, if I was intending
> to do something like abscond with G***** do you think I would admit it
> beforehand?  And if that was my intention, why would I bother going through
> all this stupid shit with you?  Why wouldn't I just go to Phoenix and pick
> him up?  What?  Do you think it's impossible for me to walk right into the
> US?  Do you think they scrutinize me every time I cross the border?  My
> god, there is no end to your stupidity, is there?
>
> And besides, what do you really care?  You only have, at most, another 16
> months until you have absolutely no legal authority over him, anyway.
> Yeah, that's right, the day he turns 16 and his foot touches the ground in
> the Province of Ontario he is a legal adult and cannot be forced to return
> to his parents - because he now has Canadian citizenship - because of
> *YOUR* actions.  I don't even need to be in Canada myself.
>
> Patrick
>
>
> On 05/06/2015 06:46 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>
> Are you planning on returning G*****?
>
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  > wrote:
>
>>  Desiree:
>>
>> I cannot imagine why you would hear that because I never said that.
>>
>> I will tell you this, unequivocally: Since you did not require I provide
>> the return flight information in order to allow G***** to travel from
>> Phoenix to Los Angeles on May 24, 2015, then from Los Angeles to Vancouver
>> on May 28, 2015, and you only brought that up AFTER I purchased the
>> tickets, then NO!  I absolutely will not purchase his return ticket until I
>> know he is actually going to be present in Vancouver.
>>
>> I have no history of backing out of commitments, or saying completely
>> false stuff to get what I want.  You do!  You are the one that cannot be
>> trusted, not me.
>>
>> Now, our dealings here are done.  I have fulfilled the requirements you
>> stated in writing.  You are now attempting to change those requirements by
>> adding new requirements.  It is not going to happen!  I don't believe there
>> is anything further for us to discuss between now and when G***** arrives
>> here on May 28, 2015.
>>
>> I have posted all of our emails from today onto your wonderful website so
>> there is a public record of all of your words.
>>
>> Good day,
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>> On 05/06/2015 06:35 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>
>> So, what I hear is that you will send me the details of his return
>> itinerary before he travels on the 24th of May?
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  wrote:
>>
>>>  Desiree:
>>>
>>> I'd like to point out that that was NOT one of your stated
>>> requirements.  I told G***** that this is what you would do: you'll make
>>> up a bunch of requirements then, if I meet those requirements, you'll add
>>> more requirements, and if I meet those you'll just keep adding more.  Same
>>> shit my mother used to do to my father.
>>>
>>> Well, it ain't gonna happen.  I met your requirements and I'm just dying
>>> for you to fuck up enough that the court will consider your behavior
>>> egregious.  So far you've:
>>> - refused to allow G***** to visit during one extended school break;
>>> - taken away his phone, cutting off all communication between him and I
>>> for an extended duration of time, without providing me any notice;
>>> - taken away his debit card so I cannot provide him financial support;
>>> - refused to provide him even the minimal level of medical care that the
>>> California legislature mandates;
>>> - continued to keep drugs in the home.
>>>
>>> So, go ahead, refuse to let him visit over the summer.  Give me a reason
>>> that the court will consider justifiable to take away not only your custody
>>> but also visitation.  And keep giving G***** reasons to resent you.
>>> Regardless of what the court does, the important thing is that G*****
>>> grows to hate you and you are doing an excellent job of pushing him in that
>>> direction.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/06/2015 05:58 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>
>>> If I do not have a travel itinerary for G*****'s return flight to
>>> Phoenix on July 12th, 2015 then he will not board a plan to travel
>>> anywhere.  Are you still unclear as to my meaning?
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Patrick 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  I cannot possibly answer that question.  I suspect what you mean to
>>>> ask is not actually what you asked.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/06/2015 05:44 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the itineraries.  When can I expect one for his return
>>>> trip?
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> At least my insults to you are based in reality.  Surely, you're not
>>>>> trying to suggest that you're intellectually superior to me.  I believe our
>>>>> many debates via email show that not to be true.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:46 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Funny but "stupid fucking cunt" looks nothing like a travel
>>>>> itinerary...maybe you're confused again.  Do you need me to copy and paste
>>>>> an example for you??
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Sorry, I meant to say "stupid fucking cunt".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:38 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure...as soon as you send me a travel itinerary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you stop being a stupid fucking for even just a minute?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:31 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're right, I didn't call every single airline to check their age
>>>>>>> limitations for you.  Did you need me to do all of the research for you?
>>>>>>> Do you need me to hold your hand through this whole process??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure, and if he can be at PHX by 4:30am then there's a 6:37am
>>>>>>>> flight on Air Canada for $395, with a 2:15 layover in San Fran, for a total
>>>>>>>> travel time of 6:50; or there's a couple of 6:11am Air Canadas for $463
>>>>>>>> with 2 stops for a travel time of 10:17 and 11:47, respectively; or a 1:43
>>>>>>>> with one layover in Denver for $559, travel time: 7:26.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you do everything half-assed?  Can you just go away and shut
>>>>>>>> up?  I don't believe that there is ANY way that your involvement in
>>>>>>>> something would ever make it better so why don't you just go to your room
>>>>>>>> and smoke some weed or something?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:15 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Air Canada allows it at 12 - I already called them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you realize that many airlines now do not let a person under 15
>>>>>>>>> travel alone?  Do you realize how that limits the number of flights
>>>>>>>>> available to choose from?  Do you ever look into things before you speak?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am calling airlines right now.  If I am able to secure a ticket
>>>>>>>>> I will let you know.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:09 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would assume with all that free time on your hands you would be
>>>>>>>>> able to secure G***** a plane ticket, yet I don't have a travel itinerary.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Last night I sent you an email requesting what you will permit
>>>>>>>>>> with respect to layover duration, et cetera.  Why, when I request
>>>>>>>>>> clarification of anything from you, do you always refuse to provide it?
>>>>>>>>>> You refuse to be clear - even when the other party explicitly requests
>>>>>>>>>> clarification - and then later you try to accuse the other party of
>>>>>>>>>> "misinterpreting" what you meant.  Maybe if you used the English language
>>>>>>>>>> correctly clarification would not be necessary.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 02:23 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Once again - I don't see a travel itinerary.  Do you want to keep
>>>>>>>>>> talking or do you want to see your son?  Are you seriously suggesting you
>>>>>>>>>> would book G***** on a 15 hour flight?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's wonderful.  You have never indicated that you would allow
>>>>>>>>>>> a flight which has connectors and based on your demonstrated refusal to
>>>>>>>>>>> allow your children any independence, one must assume that you would not
be
>>>>>>>>>>> amenable to such flights.  I have, repeatedly, asked you whether such
>>>>>>>>>>> travel arrangements would be permissible and you have refused to respond.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that you're okay with a 15 hour flight, including
>>>>>>>>>>> a 10 hour layover in a distant city?  You may notice, the lowest priced
>>>>>>>>>>> direct flight is $965US, which is about $1200CDN.  You realize I would be
>>>>>>>>>>> paying in Canadian dollars, right?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you insist on blaming your fuck-ups and shortcomings on
>>>>>>>>>>> me?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 02:10 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In case you have trouble navigating the link, I took the liberty
>>>>>>>>>>> of taking screenshots for you (there are 11 pages of flights to choose
>>>>>>>>>>> from);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Desiree Capuano <
>>>>>>>>>>> desiree.capuano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate it if you would keep your emotions in check
>>>>>>>>>>>> as we attempt to discuss and resolve this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Did I ever once say I needed to know where G***** was going
>>>>>>>>>>>> to be every single minute of every single day?  No, I haven't.  I told
you
>>>>>>>>>>>> specifically what information I needed, which was regarding the
>>>>>>>>>>>> plane/flight information ONLY but you wanted to argue about the meaning
of
>>>>>>>>>>>> "including but not limited to".
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  You never once asked me to work with you on the date of his
>>>>>>>>>>>> departure, you demanded it and only AFTER I said 'No' did you bring up
that
>>>>>>>>>>>> it was about the cost.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   With all your threats to "destroy me", the emails you've
>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to my work, and that horrendous website still up and being hosted
from
>>>>>>>>>>>> your home computer - what makes you think that I should do ANYTHING to
help
>>>>>>>>>>>> you out?  Tell me exactly why I am responsible for taking time off of
work
>>>>>>>>>>>> to accommodate you? Where exactly does it say that I am required to in
the
>>>>>>>>>>>> court decree?  Please show me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  See - you still don't get it.  If you had come to me and said
>>>>>>>>>>>> "hey, flights are cheaper on Wednesday and I would really appreciate it
if
>>>>>>>>>>>> you would work with me on G*****'s travel" I would have done it.  Even
>>>>>>>>>>>> after everything you have done (especially beginning in March).  The
fight
>>>>>>>>>>>> here is one sided, always has been.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Now to wrap this up, I do NOT need (from you or Liz);
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially a list of places
>>>>>>>>>>>> to visit; plan of travel. *
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2. a line of travel; route.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  *3. an account of a journey; record of travel.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> * 4. a book describing a route or routes of travel with
>>>>>>>>>>>> information helpful to travelers; guidebook for travelers.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  What I need is the same thing you have sent me for every
>>>>>>>>>>>> other visitation G***** has had to see you - the confirmation from the
>>>>>>>>>>>> airline that includes the flight information (generally referred to as a
>>>>>>>>>>>> "travel itinerary" - I can copy and paste a picture of one of you still
>>>>>>>>>>>> need it for reference).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   I just did a search on Google and found the following;
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  http://www.kayak.com/flights/PHX-YVR/2015-05-24
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  I gave you the travel dates on April 20th.  You could have
>>>>>>>>>>>> purchase a ticket at any point in the last 2 weeks.  Instead you want to
>>>>>>>>>>>> quibble over dictionary definitions and cite case law and now there are
no
>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable flights left that are non-stop.  So I guess I have no choice
but
>>>>>>>>>>>> to allow a layover, unless you want to explain to Liz that you were
>>>>>>>>>>>> incorrect in your interpretation of what I said.  Regardless
>>>>>>>>>>>> of where he's traveling to, send me the flight confirmation.  Or don't
and
>>>>>>>>>>>> we can most certainly take this back to court and you can plead your
case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Cheerio
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 5, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How am I the one making it complicated when you're the one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> changing your demands?  Please see my further comments below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/05/2015 08:55 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is just unnecessarily complicated.  Even for you.  Let me
>>>>>>>>>>>>> make this VERY simple so that you can follow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.       As stated on the email 05/04/2015 which you cited,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gariel's permissible time period for visitation with you is between May
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 24th, 2015 and July 12th, 2015.  This means that the EARLIEST he may
leave
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona is May 24th, and the LATEST that G***** may be returned to my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> custody is July 12th, 2015.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.       As stated previously as well, G***** is to depart
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona on a weekend, and be returned on a weekend within the above
stated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time period of visitation.  NOT a week day.  G***** and I have both
looked
>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the prices for tickets, and there is not a significant price
difference
>>>>>>>>>>>>> between equivalent weekend and week day flights as you (falsely) stated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously.  This is not a significant financial hardship.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In your email dated 2015-05-04 you stated, and I'm quoting,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "G***** *may travel* for the purposes of visitation *between
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the dates of* May 24th and July 12th, 2015" (emphasis
>>>>>>>>>>>>> added).  You stated, in your own words, in writing, that G***** may
travel
>>>>>>>>>>>>> between the two stated dates and you did not further qualify it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You still have not provided a reason as to WHY you will not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> permit G***** to travel on a weekday.  Contrary to your grossly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> misinformed belief, you ARE required to provide a reason under these
>>>>>>>>>>>>> circumstances.  You need to find yourself a better legal advisor.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are full of shit about the cost of the flights.  A flight
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on May 27, 28 is $150 - $180; on May 24 it's $1300, on May 30, 31 it
$550
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and up.  How is that not a significant difference?  If you're going to
make
>>>>>>>>>>>>> such claims then provide proof.  Where did you find such ticket prices?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  3.       You and I have already discussed a situation where
>>>>>>>>>>>>> by you have an option for G***** to fly to LA to visit with Liz on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> weekend, then fly to visit you in Canada during a week day.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have imposed unreasonable requirements on allowing G*****
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to fly to LA.  You insist that you require a complete itinerary but
then
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you refuse to clarify exactly what information you are demanding.  That
is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same stupid single mother bullshit my mother did when I was a kid
and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not going to waste my time on it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  4.       The above visitation as previously stated ALSO is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contingent upon a full travel itinerary including all flight and travel
>>>>>>>>>>>>> plans.  You've done this before, so it shouldn't be difficult or a
surprise.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Go look up the word "itinerary", you fucking moron!  What
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking language do you speak?  Is it some made up version of English?
Is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it because your American that you're such an idiot?  Let me help you
(from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionary.reference.com):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> itinerary
>>>>>>>>>>>>> noun, plural itineraries.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially a list of places
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to visit; plan of travel.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. a line of travel; route.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. an account of a journey; record of travel.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. a book describing a route or routes of travel with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> information helpful to travelers; guidebook for travelers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what the fuck are you asking for?  Just the flight
>>>>>>>>>>>>> information?  Do you want to know exactly where he is going to be each
>>>>>>>>>>>>> day?  Be more fucking specific you fucking idiot!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck you, and fuck your stupid, white trash, single mother
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit games.  I'm going to get him a ticket for the 27th or 28th and
if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you don't allow him to leave then I get to show the court that not
once,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but twice now you've refused to allow him to visit during his extended
>>>>>>>>>>>>> school breaks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good day, I'm not reading any further because your stupidity
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hurts my head.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  *Recap*:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel between 05/24/2015-07/12/2015.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel FROM Arizona on Weekends  within the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>> listed dates (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel TO Arizona on Weekends within the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>> listed dates (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ·         Visitation with Liz is permissible, and up front
>>>>>>>>>>>>> visitation which has also been discussed is also permissible as long as
I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> am apprised of G*****'s location and the plans.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ·         The above plans as previously stated are contingent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> upon you providing me a full travel itinerary including all flight
details
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and arrangements for G***** while on travel.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Patrick <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> patrick@desireecapuano.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  You're the one going "round and round".  I HAVE reviewed the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous emails, which is why I require clarification - first you
stated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one set of requirements, then you stated a different set of
requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are grossly mistaken about the meaning and legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of "including but not limited to".  You might want to
review,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for example, some current case law on the matter.  Specifically, the
"but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not limited to" means the previously stated list of requirements is
NOT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exhaustive and MAY include additional, not explicitly stated,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requirements.  Stop pretending to be smarter than you are!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If what you wish to express is that you require specific
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information then you should have phrased it as, for example:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I will require x, y, z.  Additional information may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provided, at your discretion, but is not required by me."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on your most recent email THAT is what you meant to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say.  But that is 100% contrary to what you ACTUALLY said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since, literally, what you have said in your email dated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015-05-04 is that G***** is permitted to travel "between" the dates
of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "May 24th and July 12th", with no additional exclusions or
qualifications,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am going to obtain G***** a flight from Phoenix to Vancouver for a
date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which will be reasonable and cost effective.  I don't care if that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conducive with your work schedule because there is no requirement that
you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MUST personally transport him to the airport or be present at the time
of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his departure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the event you are actually interested in better educating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself (since, clearly UoP hasn't done much for you in that
respect),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here are a couple links regarding "including but not limited to":
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adamsdrafting.com/including-without-limitation/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.weagree.com/book/96-The+issue+of+%E2%80%98include%E2%80%99+
and+%E2%80%98without+limitation%E2%80%99.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/including-vs-including-without-
limit-48967/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.americancriminallawreview.com/aclr-online/overplaying-
their-hand-overly-broad-interpretive-canons-applied-including-not-limited-clauses/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/05/2015 12:59 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I really don't have the time or patience for this.  You
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>