Mail

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
desiree.capuano@gmail.com
japendletonjr@gmail.com
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: G***** summer visitation 2015
From: Desiree Capuano <desiree.capuano@gmail.com>
To: Patrick <patrick@desireecapuano.com>
Date: Wed, May 06 2015 6:46:22 pm
Are you planning on returning G*****?

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  wrote:

>  Desiree:
>
> I cannot imagine why you would hear that because I never said that.
>
> I will tell you this, unequivocally: Since you did not require I provide
> the return flight information in order to allow G***** to travel from
> Phoenix to Los Angeles on May 24, 2015, then from Los Angeles to Vancouver
> on May 28, 2015, and you only brought that up AFTER I purchased the
> tickets, then NO!  I absolutely will not purchase his return ticket until I
> know he is actually going to be present in Vancouver.
>
> I have no history of backing out of commitments, or saying completely
> false stuff to get what I want.  You do!  You are the one that cannot be
> trusted, not me.
>
> Now, our dealings here are done.  I have fulfilled the requirements you
> stated in writing.  You are now attempting to change those requirements by
> adding new requirements.  It is not going to happen!  I don't believe there
> is anything further for us to discuss between now and when G***** arrives
> here on May 28, 2015.
>
> I have posted all of our emails from today onto your wonderful website so
> there is a public record of all of your words.
>
> Good day,
> Patrick
>
>
> On 05/06/2015 06:35 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>
> So, what I hear is that you will send me the details of his return
> itinerary before he travels on the 24th of May?
>
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  > wrote:
>
>>  Desiree:
>>
>> I'd like to point out that that was NOT one of your stated requirements.
>> I told G***** that this is what you would do: you'll make up a bunch of
>> requirements then, if I meet those requirements, you'll add more
>> requirements, and if I meet those you'll just keep adding more.  Same shit
>> my mother used to do to my father.
>>
>> Well, it ain't gonna happen.  I met your requirements and I'm just dying
>> for you to fuck up enough that the court will consider your behavior
>> egregious.  So far you've:
>> - refused to allow G***** to visit during one extended school break;
>> - taken away his phone, cutting off all communication between him and I
>> for an extended duration of time, without providing me any notice;
>> - taken away his debit card so I cannot provide him financial support;
>> - refused to provide him even the minimal level of medical care that the
>> California legislature mandates;
>> - continued to keep drugs in the home.
>>
>> So, go ahead, refuse to let him visit over the summer.  Give me a reason
>> that the court will consider justifiable to take away not only your custody
>> but also visitation.  And keep giving G***** reasons to resent you.
>> Regardless of what the court does, the important thing is that G*****
>> grows to hate you and you are doing an excellent job of pushing him in that
>> direction.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>> On 05/06/2015 05:58 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>
>> If I do not have a travel itinerary for G*****'s return flight to
>> Phoenix on July 12th, 2015 then he will not board a plan to travel
>> anywhere.  Are you still unclear as to my meaning?
>>
>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Patrick 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  I cannot possibly answer that question.  I suspect what you mean to ask
>>> is not actually what you asked.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/06/2015 05:44 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you for the itineraries.  When can I expect one for his return
>>> trip?
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>
>>>> At least my insults to you are based in reality.  Surely, you're not
>>>> trying to suggest that you're intellectually superior to me.  I believe our
>>>> many debates via email show that not to be true.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:46 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Funny but "stupid fucking cunt" looks nothing like a travel
>>>> itinerary...maybe you're confused again.  Do you need me to copy and paste
>>>> an example for you??
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Sorry, I meant to say "stupid fucking cunt".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:38 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure...as soon as you send me a travel itinerary.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you stop being a stupid fucking for even just a minute?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:31 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're right, I didn't call every single airline to check their age
>>>>>> limitations for you.  Did you need me to do all of the research for you?
>>>>>> Do you need me to hold your hand through this whole process??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure, and if he can be at PHX by 4:30am then there's a 6:37am flight
>>>>>>> on Air Canada for $395, with a 2:15 layover in San Fran, for a total travel
>>>>>>> time of 6:50; or there's a couple of 6:11am Air Canadas for $463 with 2
>>>>>>> stops for a travel time of 10:17 and 11:47, respectively; or a 1:43 with
>>>>>>> one layover in Denver for $559, travel time: 7:26.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you do everything half-assed?  Can you just go away and shut up?
>>>>>>> I don't believe that there is ANY way that your involvement in something
>>>>>>> would ever make it better so why don't you just go to your room and smoke
>>>>>>> some weed or something?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:15 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Air Canada allows it at 12 - I already called them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you realize that many airlines now do not let a person under 15
>>>>>>>> travel alone?  Do you realize how that limits the number of flights
>>>>>>>> available to choose from?  Do you ever look into things before you speak?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am calling airlines right now.  If I am able to secure a ticket I
>>>>>>>> will let you know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:09 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would assume with all that free time on your hands you would be
>>>>>>>> able to secure G***** a plane ticket, yet I don't have a travel itinerary.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Last night I sent you an email requesting what you will permit
>>>>>>>>> with respect to layover duration, et cetera.  Why, when I request
>>>>>>>>> clarification of anything from you, do you always refuse to provide it?
>>>>>>>>> You refuse to be clear - even when the other party explicitly requests
>>>>>>>>> clarification - and then later you try to accuse the other party of
>>>>>>>>> "misinterpreting" what you meant.  Maybe if you used the English language
>>>>>>>>> correctly clarification would not be necessary.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 02:23 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Once again - I don't see a travel itinerary.  Do you want to keep
>>>>>>>>> talking or do you want to see your son?  Are you seriously suggesting you
>>>>>>>>> would book G***** on a 15 hour flight?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's wonderful.  You have never indicated that you would allow
>>>>>>>>>> a flight which has connectors and based on your demonstrated refusal to
>>>>>>>>>> allow your children any independence, one must assume that you would not
be
>>>>>>>>>> amenable to such flights.  I have, repeatedly, asked you whether such
>>>>>>>>>> travel arrangements would be permissible and you have refused to respond.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that you're okay with a 15 hour flight, including
>>>>>>>>>> a 10 hour layover in a distant city?  You may notice, the lowest priced
>>>>>>>>>> direct flight is $965US, which is about $1200CDN.  You realize I would be
>>>>>>>>>> paying in Canadian dollars, right?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why do you insist on blaming your fuck-ups and shortcomings on me?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 02:10 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In case you have trouble navigating the link, I took the liberty
>>>>>>>>>> of taking screenshots for you (there are 11 pages of flights to choose
>>>>>>>>>> from);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Desiree Capuano <
>>>>>>>>>> desiree.capuano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate it if you would keep your emotions in check
>>>>>>>>>>> as we attempt to discuss and resolve this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Did I ever once say I needed to know where G***** was going
>>>>>>>>>>> to be every single minute of every single day?  No, I haven't.  I told
you
>>>>>>>>>>> specifically what information I needed, which was regarding the
>>>>>>>>>>> plane/flight information ONLY but you wanted to argue about the meaning
of
>>>>>>>>>>> "including but not limited to".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  You never once asked me to work with you on the date of his
>>>>>>>>>>> departure, you demanded it and only AFTER I said 'No' did you bring up
that
>>>>>>>>>>> it was about the cost.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>   With all your threats to "destroy me", the emails you've sent
>>>>>>>>>>> to my work, and that horrendous website still up and being hosted from
your
>>>>>>>>>>> home computer - what makes you think that I should do ANYTHING to help
you
>>>>>>>>>>> out?  Tell me exactly why I am responsible for taking time off of work to
>>>>>>>>>>> accommodate you? Where exactly does it say that I am required to in the
>>>>>>>>>>> court decree?  Please show me.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  See - you still don't get it.  If you had come to me and said
>>>>>>>>>>> "hey, flights are cheaper on Wednesday and I would really appreciate it
if
>>>>>>>>>>> you would work with me on G*****'s travel" I would have done it.  Even
>>>>>>>>>>> after everything you have done (especially beginning in March).  The
fight
>>>>>>>>>>> here is one sided, always has been.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Now to wrap this up, I do NOT need (from you or Liz);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially a list of places
>>>>>>>>>>> to visit; plan of travel. *
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> * 2. a line of travel; route.*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  *3. an account of a journey; record of travel.*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> * 4. a book describing a route or routes of travel with
>>>>>>>>>>> information helpful to travelers; guidebook for travelers.*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  What I need is the same thing you have sent me for every other
>>>>>>>>>>> visitation G***** has had to see you - the confirmation from the airline
>>>>>>>>>>> that includes the flight information (generally referred to as a "travel
>>>>>>>>>>> itinerary" - I can copy and paste a picture of one of you still need it
for
>>>>>>>>>>> reference).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>   I just did a search on Google and found the following;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  http://www.kayak.com/flights/PHX-YVR/2015-05-24
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  I gave you the travel dates on April 20th.  You could have
>>>>>>>>>>> purchase a ticket at any point in the last 2 weeks.  Instead you want to
>>>>>>>>>>> quibble over dictionary definitions and cite case law and now there are
no
>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable flights left that are non-stop.  So I guess I have no choice
but
>>>>>>>>>>> to allow a layover, unless you want to explain to Liz that you were
>>>>>>>>>>> incorrect in your interpretation of what I said.  Regardless of
>>>>>>>>>>> where he's traveling to, send me the flight confirmation.  Or don't and
we
>>>>>>>>>>> can most certainly take this back to court and you can plead your case.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Cheerio
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 5, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How am I the one making it complicated when you're the one
>>>>>>>>>>>> changing your demands?  Please see my further comments below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/05/2015 08:55 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is just unnecessarily complicated.  Even for you.  Let me
>>>>>>>>>>>> make this VERY simple so that you can follow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.       As stated on the email 05/04/2015 which you cited,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Gariel's permissible time period for visitation with you is between May
>>>>>>>>>>>> 24th, 2015 and July 12th, 2015.  This means that the EARLIEST he may
leave
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona is May 24th, and the LATEST that G***** may be returned to my
>>>>>>>>>>>> custody is July 12th, 2015.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.       As stated previously as well, G***** is to depart
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona on a weekend, and be returned on a weekend within the above
stated
>>>>>>>>>>>> time period of visitation.  NOT a week day.  G***** and I have both
looked
>>>>>>>>>>>> up the prices for tickets, and there is not a significant price
difference
>>>>>>>>>>>> between equivalent weekend and week day flights as you (falsely) stated
>>>>>>>>>>>> previously.  This is not a significant financial hardship.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In your email dated 2015-05-04 you stated, and I'm quoting,
>>>>>>>>>>>> "G***** *may travel* for the purposes of visitation *between
>>>>>>>>>>>> the dates of* May 24th and July 12th, 2015" (emphasis added).
>>>>>>>>>>>> You stated, in your own words, in writing, that G***** may travel
between
>>>>>>>>>>>> the two stated dates and you did not further qualify it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You still have not provided a reason as to WHY you will not
>>>>>>>>>>>> permit G***** to travel on a weekday.  Contrary to your grossly
>>>>>>>>>>>> misinformed belief, you ARE required to provide a reason under these
>>>>>>>>>>>> circumstances.  You need to find yourself a better legal advisor.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You are full of shit about the cost of the flights.  A flight
>>>>>>>>>>>> on May 27, 28 is $150 - $180; on May 24 it's $1300, on May 30, 31 it
$550
>>>>>>>>>>>> and up.  How is that not a significant difference?  If you're going to
make
>>>>>>>>>>>> such claims then provide proof.  Where did you find such ticket prices?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  3.       You and I have already discussed a situation where
>>>>>>>>>>>> by you have an option for G***** to fly to LA to visit with Liz on a
>>>>>>>>>>>> weekend, then fly to visit you in Canada during a week day.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You have imposed unreasonable requirements on allowing G*****
>>>>>>>>>>>> to fly to LA.  You insist that you require a complete itinerary but then
>>>>>>>>>>>> you refuse to clarify exactly what information you are demanding.  That
is
>>>>>>>>>>>> the same stupid single mother bullshit my mother did when I was a kid
and
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not going to waste my time on it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  4.       The above visitation as previously stated ALSO is
>>>>>>>>>>>> contingent upon a full travel itinerary including all flight and travel
>>>>>>>>>>>> plans.  You've done this before, so it shouldn't be difficult or a
surprise.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Go look up the word "itinerary", you fucking moron!  What
>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking language do you speak?  Is it some made up version of English?
Is
>>>>>>>>>>>> it because your American that you're such an idiot?  Let me help you
(from
>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionary.reference.com):
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> itinerary
>>>>>>>>>>>> noun, plural itineraries.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially a list of places
>>>>>>>>>>>> to visit; plan of travel.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. a line of travel; route.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. an account of a journey; record of travel.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. a book describing a route or routes of travel with
>>>>>>>>>>>> information helpful to travelers; guidebook for travelers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So what the fuck are you asking for?  Just the flight
>>>>>>>>>>>> information?  Do you want to know exactly where he is going to be each
>>>>>>>>>>>> day?  Be more fucking specific you fucking idiot!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck you, and fuck your stupid, white trash, single mother
>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit games.  I'm going to get him a ticket for the 27th or 28th and
if
>>>>>>>>>>>> you don't allow him to leave then I get to show the court that not once,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but twice now you've refused to allow him to visit during his extended
>>>>>>>>>>>> school breaks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Good day, I'm not reading any further because your stupidity
>>>>>>>>>>>> hurts my head.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  *Recap*:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel between 05/24/2015-07/12/2015.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel FROM Arizona on Weekends  within the above
>>>>>>>>>>>> listed dates (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel TO Arizona on Weekends within the above
>>>>>>>>>>>> listed dates (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ·         Visitation with Liz is permissible, and up front
>>>>>>>>>>>> visitation which has also been discussed is also permissible as long as
I
>>>>>>>>>>>> am apprised of G*****'s location and the plans.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ·         The above plans as previously stated are contingent
>>>>>>>>>>>> upon you providing me a full travel itinerary including all flight
details
>>>>>>>>>>>> and arrangements for G***** while on travel.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Patrick <
>>>>>>>>>>>> patrick@desireecapuano.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  You're the one going "round and round".  I HAVE reviewed the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous emails, which is why I require clarification - first you
stated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one set of requirements, then you stated a different set of
requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are grossly mistaken about the meaning and legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of "including but not limited to".  You might want to
review,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for example, some current case law on the matter.  Specifically, the
"but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not limited to" means the previously stated list of requirements is NOT
>>>>>>>>>>>>> exhaustive and MAY include additional, not explicitly stated,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> requirements.  Stop pretending to be smarter than you are!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If what you wish to express is that you require specific
>>>>>>>>>>>>> information then you should have phrased it as, for example:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I will require x, y, z.  Additional information may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> provided, at your discretion, but is not required by me."
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on your most recent email THAT is what you meant to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> say.  But that is 100% contrary to what you ACTUALLY said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since, literally, what you have said in your email dated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015-05-04 is that G***** is permitted to travel "between" the dates
of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "May 24th and July 12th", with no additional exclusions or
qualifications,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am going to obtain G***** a flight from Phoenix to Vancouver for a
date
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which will be reasonable and cost effective.  I don't care if that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conducive with your work schedule because there is no requirement that
you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MUST personally transport him to the airport or be present at the time
of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> his departure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the event you are actually interested in better educating
>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself (since, clearly UoP hasn't done much for you in that respect),
>>>>>>>>>>>>> here are a couple links regarding "including but not limited to":
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adamsdrafting.com/including-without-limitation/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.weagree.com/book/96-The+issue+of+%E2%80%98include%E2%80%99+a
nd+%E2%80%98without+limitation%E2%80%99.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/including-vs-including-without-
limit-48967/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.americancriminallawreview.com/aclr-online/overplaying-their-
hand-overly-broad-interpretive-canons-applied-including-not-limited-clauses/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/05/2015 12:59 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I really don't have the time or patience for this.  You seem
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to want to go round and round on questions that have already been
>>>>>>>>>>>>> answered.  You asked for a confirmation of dates and I gave it to you.
If
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you require additional calrification, read the previous emails in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread.  "Including but not limited to" means that I will accept any
>>>>>>>>>>>>> additional information you have to provide, but I require the stated
pieces
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of information at a minimum.  Understanding the use of this term is
covered
>>>>>>>>>>>>> under basic reading comprehension.  The only other email correspondence
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that needs to be provided is the travel itinerary.  There is no need
for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> any further discussion of the matter and as such I will not be
responding
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to anything else.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Good Day
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, May 4, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What additional information will you "need"?  Your response
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states "...including [sic] but not limited to...", which means that
you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>