Mail

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
desiree.capuano@gmail.com
japendletonjr@gmail.com
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: G***** summer visitation 2015
From: Desiree Capuano <desiree.capuano@gmail.com>
To: Patrick <patrick@desireecapuano.com>
Date: Wed, May 06 2015 6:35:30 pm
So, what I hear is that you will send me the details of his return
itinerary before he travels on the 24th of May?

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  wrote:

>  Desiree:
>
> I'd like to point out that that was NOT one of your stated requirements.
> I told G***** that this is what you would do: you'll make up a bunch of
> requirements then, if I meet those requirements, you'll add more
> requirements, and if I meet those you'll just keep adding more.  Same shit
> my mother used to do to my father.
>
> Well, it ain't gonna happen.  I met your requirements and I'm just dying
> for you to fuck up enough that the court will consider your behavior
> egregious.  So far you've:
> - refused to allow G***** to visit during one extended school break;
> - taken away his phone, cutting off all communication between him and I
> for an extended duration of time, without providing me any notice;
> - taken away his debit card so I cannot provide him financial support;
> - refused to provide him even the minimal level of medical care that the
> California legislature mandates;
> - continued to keep drugs in the home.
>
> So, go ahead, refuse to let him visit over the summer.  Give me a reason
> that the court will consider justifiable to take away not only your custody
> but also visitation.  And keep giving G***** reasons to resent you.
> Regardless of what the court does, the important thing is that G*****
> grows to hate you and you are doing an excellent job of pushing him in that
> direction.
>
> Patrick
>
>
> On 05/06/2015 05:58 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>
> If I do not have a travel itinerary for G*****'s return flight to Phoenix
> on July 12th, 2015 then he will not board a plan to travel anywhere.  Are
> you still unclear as to my meaning?
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Patrick  > wrote:
>
>>  I cannot possibly answer that question.  I suspect what you mean to ask
>> is not actually what you asked.
>>
>>
>> On 05/06/2015 05:44 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for the itineraries.  When can I expect one for his return
>> trip?
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick > > wrote:
>>
>>>  Desiree:
>>>
>>> At least my insults to you are based in reality.  Surely, you're not
>>> trying to suggest that you're intellectually superior to me.  I believe our
>>> many debates via email show that not to be true.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/06/2015 04:46 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>
>>> Funny but "stupid fucking cunt" looks nothing like a travel
>>> itinerary...maybe you're confused again.  Do you need me to copy and paste
>>> an example for you??
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Sorry, I meant to say "stupid fucking cunt".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:38 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sure...as soon as you send me a travel itinerary.
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you stop being a stupid fucking for even just a minute?
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:31 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You're right, I didn't call every single airline to check their age
>>>>> limitations for you.  Did you need me to do all of the research for you?
>>>>> Do you need me to hold your hand through this whole process??
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure, and if he can be at PHX by 4:30am then there's a 6:37am flight
>>>>>> on Air Canada for $395, with a 2:15 layover in San Fran, for a total travel
>>>>>> time of 6:50; or there's a couple of 6:11am Air Canadas for $463 with 2
>>>>>> stops for a travel time of 10:17 and 11:47, respectively; or a 1:43 with
>>>>>> one layover in Denver for $559, travel time: 7:26.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you do everything half-assed?  Can you just go away and shut up?
>>>>>> I don't believe that there is ANY way that your involvement in something
>>>>>> would ever make it better so why don't you just go to your room and smoke
>>>>>> some weed or something?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:15 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Air Canada allows it at 12 - I already called them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you realize that many airlines now do not let a person under 15
>>>>>>> travel alone?  Do you realize how that limits the number of flights
>>>>>>> available to choose from?  Do you ever look into things before you speak?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am calling airlines right now.  If I am able to secure a ticket I
>>>>>>> will let you know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:09 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would assume with all that free time on your hands you would be
>>>>>>> able to secure G***** a plane ticket, yet I don't have a travel itinerary.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Last night I sent you an email requesting what you will permit with
>>>>>>>> respect to layover duration, et cetera.  Why, when I request clarification
>>>>>>>> of anything from you, do you always refuse to provide it?  You refuse to be
>>>>>>>> clear - even when the other party explicitly requests clarification - and
>>>>>>>> then later you try to accuse the other party of "misinterpreting" what you
>>>>>>>> meant.  Maybe if you used the English language correctly clarification
>>>>>>>> would not be necessary.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 02:23 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Once again - I don't see a travel itinerary.  Do you want to keep
>>>>>>>> talking or do you want to see your son?  Are you seriously suggesting you
>>>>>>>> would book G***** on a 15 hour flight?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's wonderful.  You have never indicated that you would allow a
>>>>>>>>> flight which has connectors and based on your demonstrated refusal to allow
>>>>>>>>> your children any independence, one must assume that you would not be
>>>>>>>>> amenable to such flights.  I have, repeatedly, asked you whether such
>>>>>>>>> travel arrangements would be permissible and you have refused to respond.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that you're okay with a 15 hour flight, including a
>>>>>>>>> 10 hour layover in a distant city?  You may notice, the lowest priced
>>>>>>>>> direct flight is $965US, which is about $1200CDN.  You realize I would be
>>>>>>>>> paying in Canadian dollars, right?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why do you insist on blaming your fuck-ups and shortcomings on me?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 02:10 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In case you have trouble navigating the link, I took the liberty
>>>>>>>>> of taking screenshots for you (there are 11 pages of flights to choose
>>>>>>>>> from);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Desiree Capuano <
>>>>>>>>> desiree.capuano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate it if you would keep your emotions in check as
>>>>>>>>>> we attempt to discuss and resolve this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Did I ever once say I needed to know where G***** was going to
>>>>>>>>>> be every single minute of every single day?  No, I haven't.  I told you
>>>>>>>>>> specifically what information I needed, which was regarding the
>>>>>>>>>> plane/flight information ONLY but you wanted to argue about the meaning of
>>>>>>>>>> "including but not limited to".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  You never once asked me to work with you on the date of his
>>>>>>>>>> departure, you demanded it and only AFTER I said 'No' did you bring up
that
>>>>>>>>>> it was about the cost.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   With all your threats to "destroy me", the emails you've sent
>>>>>>>>>> to my work, and that horrendous website still up and being hosted from
your
>>>>>>>>>> home computer - what makes you think that I should do ANYTHING to help you
>>>>>>>>>> out?  Tell me exactly why I am responsible for taking time off of work to
>>>>>>>>>> accommodate you? Where exactly does it say that I am required to in the
>>>>>>>>>> court decree?  Please show me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  See - you still don't get it.  If you had come to me and said
>>>>>>>>>> "hey, flights are cheaper on Wednesday and I would really appreciate it if
>>>>>>>>>> you would work with me on G*****'s travel" I would have done it.  Even
>>>>>>>>>> after everything you have done (especially beginning in March).  The fight
>>>>>>>>>> here is one sided, always has been.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Now to wrap this up, I do NOT need (from you or Liz);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially a list of places to
>>>>>>>>>> visit; plan of travel. *
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> * 2. a line of travel; route.*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  *3. an account of a journey; record of travel.*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> * 4. a book describing a route or routes of travel with
>>>>>>>>>> information helpful to travelers; guidebook for travelers.*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  What I need is the same thing you have sent me for every other
>>>>>>>>>> visitation G***** has had to see you - the confirmation from the airline
>>>>>>>>>> that includes the flight information (generally referred to as a "travel
>>>>>>>>>> itinerary" - I can copy and paste a picture of one of you still need it
for
>>>>>>>>>> reference).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   I just did a search on Google and found the following;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  http://www.kayak.com/flights/PHX-YVR/2015-05-24
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  I gave you the travel dates on April 20th.  You could have
>>>>>>>>>> purchase a ticket at any point in the last 2 weeks.  Instead you want to
>>>>>>>>>> quibble over dictionary definitions and cite case law and now there are no
>>>>>>>>>> reasonable flights left that are non-stop.  So I guess I have no choice
but
>>>>>>>>>> to allow a layover, unless you want to explain to Liz that you were
>>>>>>>>>> incorrect in your interpretation of what I said.  Regardless of
>>>>>>>>>> where he's traveling to, send me the flight confirmation.  Or don't and we
>>>>>>>>>> can most certainly take this back to court and you can plead your case.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Cheerio
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 5, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How am I the one making it complicated when you're the one
>>>>>>>>>>> changing your demands?  Please see my further comments below.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/05/2015 08:55 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is just unnecessarily complicated.  Even for you.  Let me
>>>>>>>>>>> make this VERY simple so that you can follow.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1.       As stated on the email 05/04/2015 which you cited,
>>>>>>>>>>> Gariel's permissible time period for visitation with you is between May
>>>>>>>>>>> 24th, 2015 and July 12th, 2015.  This means that the EARLIEST he may
leave
>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona is May 24th, and the LATEST that G***** may be returned to my
>>>>>>>>>>> custody is July 12th, 2015.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2.       As stated previously as well, G***** is to depart
>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona on a weekend, and be returned on a weekend within the above
stated
>>>>>>>>>>> time period of visitation.  NOT a week day.  G***** and I have both
looked
>>>>>>>>>>> up the prices for tickets, and there is not a significant price
difference
>>>>>>>>>>> between equivalent weekend and week day flights as you (falsely) stated
>>>>>>>>>>> previously.  This is not a significant financial hardship.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In your email dated 2015-05-04 you stated, and I'm quoting,
>>>>>>>>>>> "G***** *may travel* for the purposes of visitation *between
>>>>>>>>>>> the dates of* May 24th and July 12th, 2015" (emphasis added).
>>>>>>>>>>> You stated, in your own words, in writing, that G***** may travel
between
>>>>>>>>>>> the two stated dates and you did not further qualify it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You still have not provided a reason as to WHY you will not
>>>>>>>>>>> permit G***** to travel on a weekday.  Contrary to your grossly
>>>>>>>>>>> misinformed belief, you ARE required to provide a reason under these
>>>>>>>>>>> circumstances.  You need to find yourself a better legal advisor.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You are full of shit about the cost of the flights.  A flight on
>>>>>>>>>>> May 27, 28 is $150 - $180; on May 24 it's $1300, on May 30, 31 it $550
and
>>>>>>>>>>> up.  How is that not a significant difference?  If you're going to make
>>>>>>>>>>> such claims then provide proof.  Where did you find such ticket prices?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  3.       You and I have already discussed a situation where by
>>>>>>>>>>> you have an option for G***** to fly to LA to visit with Liz on a
weekend,
>>>>>>>>>>> then fly to visit you in Canada during a week day.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You have imposed unreasonable requirements on allowing G*****
>>>>>>>>>>> to fly to LA.  You insist that you require a complete itinerary but then
>>>>>>>>>>> you refuse to clarify exactly what information you are demanding.  That
is
>>>>>>>>>>> the same stupid single mother bullshit my mother did when I was a kid and
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not going to waste my time on it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  4.       The above visitation as previously stated ALSO is
>>>>>>>>>>> contingent upon a full travel itinerary including all flight and travel
>>>>>>>>>>> plans.  You've done this before, so it shouldn't be difficult or a
surprise.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Go look up the word "itinerary", you fucking moron!  What
>>>>>>>>>>> fucking language do you speak?  Is it some made up version of English?
Is
>>>>>>>>>>> it because your American that you're such an idiot?  Let me help you
(from
>>>>>>>>>>> dictionary.reference.com):
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> itinerary
>>>>>>>>>>> noun, plural itineraries.
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially a list of places to
>>>>>>>>>>> visit; plan of travel.
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. a line of travel; route.
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. an account of a journey; record of travel.
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. a book describing a route or routes of travel with
>>>>>>>>>>> information helpful to travelers; guidebook for travelers.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So what the fuck are you asking for?  Just the flight
>>>>>>>>>>> information?  Do you want to know exactly where he is going to be each
>>>>>>>>>>> day?  Be more fucking specific you fucking idiot!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck you, and fuck your stupid, white trash, single mother
>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit games.  I'm going to get him a ticket for the 27th or 28th and
if
>>>>>>>>>>> you don't allow him to leave then I get to show the court that not once,
>>>>>>>>>>> but twice now you've refused to allow him to visit during his extended
>>>>>>>>>>> school breaks.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Good day, I'm not reading any further because your stupidity
>>>>>>>>>>> hurts my head.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  *Recap*:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel between 05/24/2015-07/12/2015.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel FROM Arizona on Weekends  within the above
>>>>>>>>>>> listed dates (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel TO Arizona on Weekends within the above listed
>>>>>>>>>>> dates (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ·         Visitation with Liz is permissible, and up front
>>>>>>>>>>> visitation which has also been discussed is also permissible as long as I
>>>>>>>>>>> am apprised of G*****'s location and the plans.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ·         The above plans as previously stated are contingent
>>>>>>>>>>> upon you providing me a full travel itinerary including all flight
details
>>>>>>>>>>> and arrangements for G***** while on travel.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Patrick <
>>>>>>>>>>> patrick@desireecapuano.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  You're the one going "round and round".  I HAVE reviewed the
>>>>>>>>>>>> previous emails, which is why I require clarification - first you stated
>>>>>>>>>>>> one set of requirements, then you stated a different set of
requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You are grossly mistaken about the meaning and legal definition
>>>>>>>>>>>> of "including but not limited to".  You might want to review, for
example,
>>>>>>>>>>>> some current case law on the matter.  Specifically, the "but not limited
>>>>>>>>>>>> to" means the previously stated list of requirements is NOT exhaustive
and
>>>>>>>>>>>> MAY include additional, not explicitly stated, requirements.  Stop
>>>>>>>>>>>> pretending to be smarter than you are!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If what you wish to express is that you require specific
>>>>>>>>>>>> information then you should have phrased it as, for example:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "I will require x, y, z.  Additional information may be
>>>>>>>>>>>> provided, at your discretion, but is not required by me."
>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on your most recent email THAT is what you meant to say.
>>>>>>>>>>>> But that is 100% contrary to what you ACTUALLY said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Since, literally, what you have said in your email dated
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015-05-04 is that G***** is permitted to travel "between" the dates of
>>>>>>>>>>>> "May 24th and July 12th", with no additional exclusions or
qualifications,
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am going to obtain G***** a flight from Phoenix to Vancouver for a
date
>>>>>>>>>>>> which will be reasonable and cost effective.  I don't care if that is
>>>>>>>>>>>> conducive with your work schedule because there is no requirement that
you
>>>>>>>>>>>> MUST personally transport him to the airport or be present at the time
of
>>>>>>>>>>>> his departure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In the event you are actually interested in better educating
>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself (since, clearly UoP hasn't done much for you in that respect),
>>>>>>>>>>>> here are a couple links regarding "including but not limited to":
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adamsdrafting.com/including-without-limitation/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.weagree.com/book/96-The+issue+of+%E2%80%98include%E2%80%99+an
d+%E2%80%98without+limitation%E2%80%99.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/including-vs-including-without-
limit-48967/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.americancriminallawreview.com/aclr-online/overplaying-their-
hand-overly-broad-interpretive-canons-applied-including-not-limited-clauses/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/05/2015 12:59 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  I really don't have the time or patience for this.  You seem
>>>>>>>>>>>> to want to go round and round on questions that have already been
>>>>>>>>>>>> answered.  You asked for a confirmation of dates and I gave it to you.
If
>>>>>>>>>>>> you require additional calrification, read the previous emails in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> thread.  "Including but not limited to" means that I will accept any
>>>>>>>>>>>> additional information you have to provide, but I require the stated
pieces
>>>>>>>>>>>> of information at a minimum.  Understanding the use of this term is
covered
>>>>>>>>>>>> under basic reading comprehension.  The only other email correspondence
>>>>>>>>>>>> that needs to be provided is the travel itinerary.  There is no need for
>>>>>>>>>>>> any further discussion of the matter and as such I will not be
responding
>>>>>>>>>>>> to anything else.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Good Day
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, May 4, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What additional information will you "need"?  Your response
>>>>>>>>>>>>> states "...including [sic] but not limited to...", which means that you
are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reserving the right to add to the stated list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, your most recent message (below) conflicts with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous message, in that you are now stating G***** may travel
"between"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the dates of May 24th and July 12th, whereas you previously stated he
may
>>>>>>>>>>>>> depart Phoenix only on May 23, 24, 30 or 31.  So that I am clear: are
you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> now saying he may depart Phoenix on other dates, as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/04/2015 09:07 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, G***** may travel for the purposes of visitation between
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the dates of May 24th and July 12th, 2015.  I will need the travel
plans
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (itinerary) all flights G***** will be occupying, including but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not limited to; the airline, day, time, flight number, confirmation
number,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and destination.  This includes his flight from California to
Vancouver.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, May 4, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>