Mail

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
desiree.capuano@gmail.com
japendletonjr@gmail.com
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: G***** summer visitation 2015
From: Desiree Capuano <desiree.capuano@gmail.com>
To: Patrick <patrick@desireecapuano.com>
Date: Wed, May 06 2015 5:58:44 pm
If I do not have a travel itinerary for G*****'s return flight to Phoenix
on July 12th, 2015 then he will not board a plan to travel anywhere.  Are
you still unclear as to my meaning?

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Patrick 
wrote:

>  I cannot possibly answer that question.  I suspect what you mean to ask
> is not actually what you asked.
>
>
> On 05/06/2015 05:44 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>
> Thank you for the itineraries.  When can I expect one for his return trip?
>
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  wrote:
>
>>  Desiree:
>>
>> At least my insults to you are based in reality.  Surely, you're not
>> trying to suggest that you're intellectually superior to me.  I believe our
>> many debates via email show that not to be true.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/06/2015 04:46 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>
>> Funny but "stupid fucking cunt" looks nothing like a travel
>> itinerary...maybe you're confused again.  Do you need me to copy and paste
>> an example for you??
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  wrote:
>>
>>>  Sorry, I meant to say "stupid fucking cunt".
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/06/2015 04:38 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure...as soon as you send me a travel itinerary.
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>
>>>> Can you stop being a stupid fucking for even just a minute?
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:31 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You're right, I didn't call every single airline to check their age
>>>> limitations for you.  Did you need me to do all of the research for you?
>>>> Do you need me to hold your hand through this whole process??
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, and if he can be at PHX by 4:30am then there's a 6:37am flight
>>>>> on Air Canada for $395, with a 2:15 layover in San Fran, for a total travel
>>>>> time of 6:50; or there's a couple of 6:11am Air Canadas for $463 with 2
>>>>> stops for a travel time of 10:17 and 11:47, respectively; or a 1:43 with
>>>>> one layover in Denver for $559, travel time: 7:26.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you do everything half-assed?  Can you just go away and shut up?  I
>>>>> don't believe that there is ANY way that your involvement in something
>>>>> would ever make it better so why don't you just go to your room and smoke
>>>>> some weed or something?
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:15 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Air Canada allows it at 12 - I already called them.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you realize that many airlines now do not let a person under 15
>>>>>> travel alone?  Do you realize how that limits the number of flights
>>>>>> available to choose from?  Do you ever look into things before you speak?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am calling airlines right now.  If I am able to secure a ticket I
>>>>>> will let you know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:09 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would assume with all that free time on your hands you would be
>>>>>> able to secure G***** a plane ticket, yet I don't have a travel itinerary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Last night I sent you an email requesting what you will permit with
>>>>>>> respect to layover duration, et cetera.  Why, when I request clarification
>>>>>>> of anything from you, do you always refuse to provide it?  You refuse to be
>>>>>>> clear - even when the other party explicitly requests clarification - and
>>>>>>> then later you try to accuse the other party of "misinterpreting" what you
>>>>>>> meant.  Maybe if you used the English language correctly clarification
>>>>>>> would not be necessary.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 02:23 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Once again - I don't see a travel itinerary.  Do you want to keep
>>>>>>> talking or do you want to see your son?  Are you seriously suggesting you
>>>>>>> would book G***** on a 15 hour flight?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's wonderful.  You have never indicated that you would allow a
>>>>>>>> flight which has connectors and based on your demonstrated refusal to allow
>>>>>>>> your children any independence, one must assume that you would not be
>>>>>>>> amenable to such flights.  I have, repeatedly, asked you whether such
>>>>>>>> travel arrangements would be permissible and you have refused to respond.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you saying that you're okay with a 15 hour flight, including a
>>>>>>>> 10 hour layover in a distant city?  You may notice, the lowest priced
>>>>>>>> direct flight is $965US, which is about $1200CDN.  You realize I would be
>>>>>>>> paying in Canadian dollars, right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why do you insist on blaming your fuck-ups and shortcomings on me?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 02:10 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In case you have trouble navigating the link, I took the liberty of
>>>>>>>> taking screenshots for you (there are 11 pages of flights to choose from);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Desiree Capuano <
>>>>>>>> desiree.capuano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate it if you would keep your emotions in check as
>>>>>>>>> we attempt to discuss and resolve this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Did I ever once say I needed to know where G***** was going to
>>>>>>>>> be every single minute of every single day?  No, I haven't.  I told you
>>>>>>>>> specifically what information I needed, which was regarding the
>>>>>>>>> plane/flight information ONLY but you wanted to argue about the meaning of
>>>>>>>>> "including but not limited to".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  You never once asked me to work with you on the date of his
>>>>>>>>> departure, you demanded it and only AFTER I said 'No' did you bring up that
>>>>>>>>> it was about the cost.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   With all your threats to "destroy me", the emails you've sent
>>>>>>>>> to my work, and that horrendous website still up and being hosted from your
>>>>>>>>> home computer - what makes you think that I should do ANYTHING to help you
>>>>>>>>> out?  Tell me exactly why I am responsible for taking time off of work to
>>>>>>>>> accommodate you? Where exactly does it say that I am required to in the
>>>>>>>>> court decree?  Please show me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  See - you still don't get it.  If you had come to me and said
>>>>>>>>> "hey, flights are cheaper on Wednesday and I would really appreciate it if
>>>>>>>>> you would work with me on G*****'s travel" I would have done it.  Even
>>>>>>>>> after everything you have done (especially beginning in March).  The fight
>>>>>>>>> here is one sided, always has been.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Now to wrap this up, I do NOT need (from you or Liz);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially a list of places to
>>>>>>>>> visit; plan of travel. *
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * 2. a line of travel; route.*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  *3. an account of a journey; record of travel.*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * 4. a book describing a route or routes of travel with
>>>>>>>>> information helpful to travelers; guidebook for travelers.*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  What I need is the same thing you have sent me for every other
>>>>>>>>> visitation G***** has had to see you - the confirmation from the airline
>>>>>>>>> that includes the flight information (generally referred to as a "travel
>>>>>>>>> itinerary" - I can copy and paste a picture of one of you still need it for
>>>>>>>>> reference).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   I just did a search on Google and found the following;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  http://www.kayak.com/flights/PHX-YVR/2015-05-24
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  I gave you the travel dates on April 20th.  You could have
>>>>>>>>> purchase a ticket at any point in the last 2 weeks.  Instead you want to
>>>>>>>>> quibble over dictionary definitions and cite case law and now there are no
>>>>>>>>> reasonable flights left that are non-stop.  So I guess I have no choice but
>>>>>>>>> to allow a layover, unless you want to explain to Liz that you were
>>>>>>>>> incorrect in your interpretation of what I said.  Regardless of
>>>>>>>>> where he's traveling to, send me the flight confirmation.  Or don't and we
>>>>>>>>> can most certainly take this back to court and you can plead your case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Cheerio
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 5, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How am I the one making it complicated when you're the one
>>>>>>>>>> changing your demands?  Please see my further comments below.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 05/05/2015 08:55 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is just unnecessarily complicated.  Even for you.  Let me
>>>>>>>>>> make this VERY simple so that you can follow.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1.       As stated on the email 05/04/2015 which you cited,
>>>>>>>>>> Gariel's permissible time period for visitation with you is between May
>>>>>>>>>> 24th, 2015 and July 12th, 2015.  This means that the EARLIEST he may leave
>>>>>>>>>> Arizona is May 24th, and the LATEST that G***** may be returned to my
>>>>>>>>>> custody is July 12th, 2015.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2.       As stated previously as well, G***** is to depart
>>>>>>>>>> Arizona on a weekend, and be returned on a weekend within the above stated
>>>>>>>>>> time period of visitation.  NOT a week day.  G***** and I have both
looked
>>>>>>>>>> up the prices for tickets, and there is not a significant price difference
>>>>>>>>>> between equivalent weekend and week day flights as you (falsely) stated
>>>>>>>>>> previously.  This is not a significant financial hardship.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In your email dated 2015-05-04 you stated, and I'm quoting,
>>>>>>>>>> "G***** *may travel* for the purposes of visitation *between
>>>>>>>>>> the dates of* May 24th and July 12th, 2015" (emphasis added).
>>>>>>>>>> You stated, in your own words, in writing, that G***** may travel between
>>>>>>>>>> the two stated dates and you did not further qualify it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You still have not provided a reason as to WHY you will not
>>>>>>>>>> permit G***** to travel on a weekday.  Contrary to your grossly
>>>>>>>>>> misinformed belief, you ARE required to provide a reason under these
>>>>>>>>>> circumstances.  You need to find yourself a better legal advisor.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You are full of shit about the cost of the flights.  A flight on
>>>>>>>>>> May 27, 28 is $150 - $180; on May 24 it's $1300, on May 30, 31 it $550 and
>>>>>>>>>> up.  How is that not a significant difference?  If you're going to make
>>>>>>>>>> such claims then provide proof.  Where did you find such ticket prices?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  3.       You and I have already discussed a situation where by
>>>>>>>>>> you have an option for G***** to fly to LA to visit with Liz on a
weekend,
>>>>>>>>>> then fly to visit you in Canada during a week day.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You have imposed unreasonable requirements on allowing G***** to
>>>>>>>>>> fly to LA.  You insist that you require a complete itinerary but then you
>>>>>>>>>> refuse to clarify exactly what information you are demanding.  That is the
>>>>>>>>>> same stupid single mother bullshit my mother did when I was a kid and I'm
>>>>>>>>>> not going to waste my time on it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  4.       The above visitation as previously stated ALSO is
>>>>>>>>>> contingent upon a full travel itinerary including all flight and travel
>>>>>>>>>> plans.  You've done this before, so it shouldn't be difficult or a
surprise.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Go look up the word "itinerary", you fucking moron!  What fucking
>>>>>>>>>> language do you speak?  Is it some made up version of English?  Is it
>>>>>>>>>> because your American that you're such an idiot?  Let me help you (from
>>>>>>>>>> dictionary.reference.com):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> itinerary
>>>>>>>>>> noun, plural itineraries.
>>>>>>>>>> 1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially a list of places to
>>>>>>>>>> visit; plan of travel.
>>>>>>>>>> 2. a line of travel; route.
>>>>>>>>>> 3. an account of a journey; record of travel.
>>>>>>>>>> 4. a book describing a route or routes of travel with information
>>>>>>>>>> helpful to travelers; guidebook for travelers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So what the fuck are you asking for?  Just the flight
>>>>>>>>>> information?  Do you want to know exactly where he is going to be each
>>>>>>>>>> day?  Be more fucking specific you fucking idiot!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fuck you, and fuck your stupid, white trash, single mother
>>>>>>>>>> bullshit games.  I'm going to get him a ticket for the 27th or 28th and if
>>>>>>>>>> you don't allow him to leave then I get to show the court that not once,
>>>>>>>>>> but twice now you've refused to allow him to visit during his extended
>>>>>>>>>> school breaks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Good day, I'm not reading any further because your stupidity
>>>>>>>>>> hurts my head.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  *Recap*:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel between 05/24/2015-07/12/2015.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel FROM Arizona on Weekends  within the above
>>>>>>>>>> listed dates (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel TO Arizona on Weekends within the above listed
>>>>>>>>>> dates (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ·         Visitation with Liz is permissible, and up front
>>>>>>>>>> visitation which has also been discussed is also permissible as long as I
>>>>>>>>>> am apprised of G*****'s location and the plans.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ·         The above plans as previously stated are contingent
>>>>>>>>>> upon you providing me a full travel itinerary including all flight details
>>>>>>>>>> and arrangements for G***** while on travel.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Patrick <
>>>>>>>>>> patrick@desireecapuano.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  You're the one going "round and round".  I HAVE reviewed the
>>>>>>>>>>> previous emails, which is why I require clarification - first you stated
>>>>>>>>>>> one set of requirements, then you stated a different set of requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You are grossly mistaken about the meaning and legal definition
>>>>>>>>>>> of "including but not limited to".  You might want to review, for
example,
>>>>>>>>>>> some current case law on the matter.  Specifically, the "but not limited
>>>>>>>>>>> to" means the previously stated list of requirements is NOT exhaustive
and
>>>>>>>>>>> MAY include additional, not explicitly stated, requirements.  Stop
>>>>>>>>>>> pretending to be smarter than you are!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If what you wish to express is that you require specific
>>>>>>>>>>> information then you should have phrased it as, for example:
>>>>>>>>>>> "I will require x, y, z.  Additional information may be
>>>>>>>>>>> provided, at your discretion, but is not required by me."
>>>>>>>>>>> Based on your most recent email THAT is what you meant to say.
>>>>>>>>>>> But that is 100% contrary to what you ACTUALLY said.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Since, literally, what you have said in your email dated
>>>>>>>>>>> 2015-05-04 is that G***** is permitted to travel "between" the dates of
>>>>>>>>>>> "May 24th and July 12th", with no additional exclusions or
qualifications,
>>>>>>>>>>> I am going to obtain G***** a flight from Phoenix to Vancouver for a
date
>>>>>>>>>>> which will be reasonable and cost effective.  I don't care if that is
>>>>>>>>>>> conducive with your work schedule because there is no requirement that
you
>>>>>>>>>>> MUST personally transport him to the airport or be present at the time of
>>>>>>>>>>> his departure.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In the event you are actually interested in better educating
>>>>>>>>>>> yourself (since, clearly UoP hasn't done much for you in that respect),
>>>>>>>>>>> here are a couple links regarding "including but not limited to":
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adamsdrafting.com/including-without-limitation/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.weagree.com/book/96-The+issue+of+%E2%80%98include%E2%80%99+and
+%E2%80%98without+limitation%E2%80%99.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/including-vs-including-without-
limit-48967/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.americancriminallawreview.com/aclr-online/overplaying-their-
hand-overly-broad-interpretive-canons-applied-including-not-limited-clauses/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/05/2015 12:59 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  I really don't have the time or patience for this.  You seem
>>>>>>>>>>> to want to go round and round on questions that have already been
>>>>>>>>>>> answered.  You asked for a confirmation of dates and I gave it to you. If
>>>>>>>>>>> you require additional calrification, read the previous emails in the
>>>>>>>>>>> thread.  "Including but not limited to" means that I will accept any
>>>>>>>>>>> additional information you have to provide, but I require the stated
pieces
>>>>>>>>>>> of information at a minimum.  Understanding the use of this term is
covered
>>>>>>>>>>> under basic reading comprehension.  The only other email correspondence
>>>>>>>>>>> that needs to be provided is the travel itinerary.  There is no need for
>>>>>>>>>>> any further discussion of the matter and as such I will not be responding
>>>>>>>>>>> to anything else.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Good Day
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, May 4, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What additional information will you "need"?  Your response
>>>>>>>>>>>> states "...including [sic] but not limited to...", which means that you
are
>>>>>>>>>>>> reserving the right to add to the stated list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, your most recent message (below) conflicts with the
>>>>>>>>>>>> previous message, in that you are now stating G***** may travel
"between"
>>>>>>>>>>>> the dates of May 24th and July 12th, whereas you previously stated he
may
>>>>>>>>>>>> depart Phoenix only on May 23, 24, 30 or 31.  So that I am clear: are
you
>>>>>>>>>>>> now saying he may depart Phoenix on other dates, as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/04/2015 09:07 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, G***** may travel for the purposes of visitation between
>>>>>>>>>>>> the dates of May 24th and July 12th, 2015.  I will need the travel plans
>>>>>>>>>>>> (itinerary) all flights G***** will be occupying, including but
>>>>>>>>>>>> not limited to; the airline, day, time, flight number, confirmation
number,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and destination.  This includes his flight from California to Vancouver.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, May 4, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please provide a definitive response clearly stating whether
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or not you are going to allow G***** to visit between the dates of May
24,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015 and July 12, 2015.  You're silence requires the other party (me)
to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> make assumptions, and assumptions are not admissible in court.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/26/2015 04:24 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What the fuck is wrong with your head?  Do you do this silly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shit just to be annoying is your whole life experience based on trailer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> parks and TV?  Come back to reality for a second, will ya?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What the fuck do you mean by "itinerary"?!?!? That is such a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking vague term.  Be specific, you fucking idiot!  You're wasting my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time with all this stupid back and forth.  You pretend like you give a
shit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> about G*****'s safety, demanding I provide an "itinerary" and that I
keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on me documents to establish I'm someone I'm not - and the other 364
days
>>>>>>>>>>>>> out of the year you don't put an ounce of interest into what's going on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with him.  Stop being such a fucking tool!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just shut the fuck up and be a normal person or just fucking
>>>>>>>>>>>>> go away.  I don't need your stupid shit and I have better things to do
than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> try to jump through your hoops for your amusement.  You're just a
fucking
>>>>>>>>>>>>> twit.  There is no documentation identifying me as Richard Riess and
you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> know it.  That deportation document is meaningless since the government
has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> admitted that I'm not that person.  What the FUCK is wrong with you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And don't go telling G***** that the reason he can't come to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> visit is because I didn't meet your "reasonable requirements".  Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> requirements are moronic and impossible to meet because they keep
changing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm done with you.  Let him visit or don't, it's your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.  He and I both know that you have 100% of the authority to
allow
>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to visit and that it is entirely on you - not me.  He turns 16 in
less
>>>>>>>>>>>>> than a year and a half and I'm pretty sure when that day arrives he's
going
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to say "Fuck you!" and that will be the last you hear of him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good day,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/26/2015 04:02 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  That sounds like an acceptable start to me.  However, as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already discussed, I will require a full itinerary for G*****'s summer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> trip.  Upon my receipt of said itinerary, I will review it in full and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide approval at such time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Also, please remember to keep a copy of your deportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>> paperwork handy as you claim that is the only legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>