Mail

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
desiree.capuano@gmail.com
japendletonjr@gmail.com
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: G***** summer visitation 2015
From: Desiree Capuano <desiree.capuano@gmail.com>
To: Patrick <patrick@desireecapuano.com>
Date: Wed, May 06 2015 5:44:45 pm
Thank you for the itineraries.  When can I expect one for his return trip?

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  wrote:

>  Desiree:
>
> At least my insults to you are based in reality.  Surely, you're not
> trying to suggest that you're intellectually superior to me.  I believe our
> many debates via email show that not to be true.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
> On 05/06/2015 04:46 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>
> Funny but "stupid fucking cunt" looks nothing like a travel
> itinerary...maybe you're confused again.  Do you need me to copy and paste
> an example for you??
>
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  > wrote:
>
>>  Sorry, I meant to say "stupid fucking cunt".
>>
>>
>> On 05/06/2015 04:38 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>
>> Sure...as soon as you send me a travel itinerary.
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  wrote:
>>
>>>  Desiree:
>>>
>>> Can you stop being a stupid fucking for even just a minute?
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/06/2015 04:31 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>
>>> You're right, I didn't call every single airline to check their age
>>> limitations for you.  Did you need me to do all of the research for you?
>>> Do you need me to hold your hand through this whole process??
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>
>>>> Sure, and if he can be at PHX by 4:30am then there's a 6:37am flight on
>>>> Air Canada for $395, with a 2:15 layover in San Fran, for a total travel
>>>> time of 6:50; or there's a couple of 6:11am Air Canadas for $463 with 2
>>>> stops for a travel time of 10:17 and 11:47, respectively; or a 1:43 with
>>>> one layover in Denver for $559, travel time: 7:26.
>>>>
>>>> Do you do everything half-assed?  Can you just go away and shut up?  I
>>>> don't believe that there is ANY way that your involvement in something
>>>> would ever make it better so why don't you just go to your room and smoke
>>>> some weed or something?
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:15 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Air Canada allows it at 12 - I already called them.
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you realize that many airlines now do not let a person under 15
>>>>> travel alone?  Do you realize how that limits the number of flights
>>>>> available to choose from?  Do you ever look into things before you speak?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am calling airlines right now.  If I am able to secure a ticket I
>>>>> will let you know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2015 04:09 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would assume with all that free time on your hands you would be able
>>>>> to secure G***** a plane ticket, yet I don't have a travel itinerary.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Last night I sent you an email requesting what you will permit with
>>>>>> respect to layover duration, et cetera.  Why, when I request clarification
>>>>>> of anything from you, do you always refuse to provide it?  You refuse to be
>>>>>> clear - even when the other party explicitly requests clarification - and
>>>>>> then later you try to accuse the other party of "misinterpreting" what you
>>>>>> meant.  Maybe if you used the English language correctly clarification
>>>>>> would not be necessary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 02:23 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once again - I don't see a travel itinerary.  Do you want to keep
>>>>>> talking or do you want to see your son?  Are you seriously suggesting you
>>>>>> would book G***** on a 15 hour flight?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's wonderful.  You have never indicated that you would allow a
>>>>>>> flight which has connectors and based on your demonstrated refusal to allow
>>>>>>> your children any independence, one must assume that you would not be
>>>>>>> amenable to such flights.  I have, repeatedly, asked you whether such
>>>>>>> travel arrangements would be permissible and you have refused to respond.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you saying that you're okay with a 15 hour flight, including a
>>>>>>> 10 hour layover in a distant city?  You may notice, the lowest priced
>>>>>>> direct flight is $965US, which is about $1200CDN.  You realize I would be
>>>>>>> paying in Canadian dollars, right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why do you insist on blaming your fuck-ups and shortcomings on me?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/06/2015 02:10 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In case you have trouble navigating the link, I took the liberty of
>>>>>>> taking screenshots for you (there are 11 pages of flights to choose from);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Desiree Capuano <
>>>>>>> desiree.capuano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would appreciate it if you would keep your emotions in check as
>>>>>>>> we attempt to discuss and resolve this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Did I ever once say I needed to know where G***** was going to
>>>>>>>> be every single minute of every single day?  No, I haven't.  I told you
>>>>>>>> specifically what information I needed, which was regarding the
>>>>>>>> plane/flight information ONLY but you wanted to argue about the meaning of
>>>>>>>> "including but not limited to".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  You never once asked me to work with you on the date of his
>>>>>>>> departure, you demanded it and only AFTER I said 'No' did you bring up that
>>>>>>>> it was about the cost.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   With all your threats to "destroy me", the emails you've sent to
>>>>>>>> my work, and that horrendous website still up and being hosted from your
>>>>>>>> home computer - what makes you think that I should do ANYTHING to help you
>>>>>>>> out?  Tell me exactly why I am responsible for taking time off of work to
>>>>>>>> accommodate you? Where exactly does it say that I am required to in the
>>>>>>>> court decree?  Please show me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  See - you still don't get it.  If you had come to me and said
>>>>>>>> "hey, flights are cheaper on Wednesday and I would really appreciate it if
>>>>>>>> you would work with me on G*****'s travel" I would have done it.  Even
>>>>>>>> after everything you have done (especially beginning in March).  The fight
>>>>>>>> here is one sided, always has been.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Now to wrap this up, I do NOT need (from you or Liz);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially a list of places to
>>>>>>>> visit; plan of travel. *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * 2. a line of travel; route.*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  *3. an account of a journey; record of travel.*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * 4. a book describing a route or routes of travel with information
>>>>>>>> helpful to travelers; guidebook for travelers.*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  What I need is the same thing you have sent me for every other
>>>>>>>> visitation G***** has had to see you - the confirmation from the airline
>>>>>>>> that includes the flight information (generally referred to as a "travel
>>>>>>>> itinerary" - I can copy and paste a picture of one of you still need it for
>>>>>>>> reference).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   I just did a search on Google and found the following;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  http://www.kayak.com/flights/PHX-YVR/2015-05-24
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  I gave you the travel dates on April 20th.  You could have
>>>>>>>> purchase a ticket at any point in the last 2 weeks.  Instead you want to
>>>>>>>> quibble over dictionary definitions and cite case law and now there are no
>>>>>>>> reasonable flights left that are non-stop.  So I guess I have no choice but
>>>>>>>> to allow a layover, unless you want to explain to Liz that you were
>>>>>>>> incorrect in your interpretation of what I said.  Regardless of
>>>>>>>> where he's traveling to, send me the flight confirmation.  Or don't and we
>>>>>>>> can most certainly take this back to court and you can plead your case.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Cheerio
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 5, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How am I the one making it complicated when you're the one
>>>>>>>>> changing your demands?  Please see my further comments below.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 05/05/2015 08:55 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is just unnecessarily complicated.  Even for you.  Let me
>>>>>>>>> make this VERY simple so that you can follow.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1.       As stated on the email 05/04/2015 which you cited,
>>>>>>>>> Gariel's permissible time period for visitation with you is between May
>>>>>>>>> 24th, 2015 and July 12th, 2015.  This means that the EARLIEST he may leave
>>>>>>>>> Arizona is May 24th, and the LATEST that G***** may be returned to my
>>>>>>>>> custody is July 12th, 2015.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2.       As stated previously as well, G***** is to depart
>>>>>>>>> Arizona on a weekend, and be returned on a weekend within the above stated
>>>>>>>>> time period of visitation.  NOT a week day.  G***** and I have both looked
>>>>>>>>> up the prices for tickets, and there is not a significant price difference
>>>>>>>>> between equivalent weekend and week day flights as you (falsely) stated
>>>>>>>>> previously.  This is not a significant financial hardship.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In your email dated 2015-05-04 you stated, and I'm quoting,
>>>>>>>>> "G***** *may travel* for the purposes of visitation *between the
>>>>>>>>> dates of* May 24th and July 12th, 2015" (emphasis added).  You
>>>>>>>>> stated, in your own words, in writing, that G***** may travel between the
>>>>>>>>> two stated dates and you did not further qualify it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You still have not provided a reason as to WHY you will not permit
>>>>>>>>> G***** to travel on a weekday.  Contrary to your grossly misinformed
>>>>>>>>> belief, you ARE required to provide a reason under these circumstances.
>>>>>>>>> You need to find yourself a better legal advisor.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You are full of shit about the cost of the flights.  A flight on
>>>>>>>>> May 27, 28 is $150 - $180; on May 24 it's $1300, on May 30, 31 it $550 and
>>>>>>>>> up.  How is that not a significant difference?  If you're going to make
>>>>>>>>> such claims then provide proof.  Where did you find such ticket prices?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  3.       You and I have already discussed a situation where by
>>>>>>>>> you have an option for G***** to fly to LA to visit with Liz on a weekend,
>>>>>>>>> then fly to visit you in Canada during a week day.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You have imposed unreasonable requirements on allowing G***** to
>>>>>>>>> fly to LA.  You insist that you require a complete itinerary but then you
>>>>>>>>> refuse to clarify exactly what information you are demanding.  That is the
>>>>>>>>> same stupid single mother bullshit my mother did when I was a kid and I'm
>>>>>>>>> not going to waste my time on it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  4.       The above visitation as previously stated ALSO is
>>>>>>>>> contingent upon a full travel itinerary including all flight and travel
>>>>>>>>> plans.  You've done this before, so it shouldn't be difficult or a
surprise.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Go look up the word "itinerary", you fucking moron!  What fucking
>>>>>>>>> language do you speak?  Is it some made up version of English?  Is it
>>>>>>>>> because your American that you're such an idiot?  Let me help you (from
>>>>>>>>> dictionary.reference.com):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> itinerary
>>>>>>>>> noun, plural itineraries.
>>>>>>>>> 1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially a list of places to
>>>>>>>>> visit; plan of travel.
>>>>>>>>> 2. a line of travel; route.
>>>>>>>>> 3. an account of a journey; record of travel.
>>>>>>>>> 4. a book describing a route or routes of travel with information
>>>>>>>>> helpful to travelers; guidebook for travelers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So what the fuck are you asking for?  Just the flight
>>>>>>>>> information?  Do you want to know exactly where he is going to be each
>>>>>>>>> day?  Be more fucking specific you fucking idiot!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fuck you, and fuck your stupid, white trash, single mother
>>>>>>>>> bullshit games.  I'm going to get him a ticket for the 27th or 28th and if
>>>>>>>>> you don't allow him to leave then I get to show the court that not once,
>>>>>>>>> but twice now you've refused to allow him to visit during his extended
>>>>>>>>> school breaks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good day, I'm not reading any further because your stupidity hurts
>>>>>>>>> my head.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  *Recap*:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel between 05/24/2015-07/12/2015.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel FROM Arizona on Weekends  within the above
>>>>>>>>> listed dates (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ·         Travel TO Arizona on Weekends within the above listed
>>>>>>>>> dates (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ·         Visitation with Liz is permissible, and up front
>>>>>>>>> visitation which has also been discussed is also permissible as long as I
>>>>>>>>> am apprised of G*****'s location and the plans.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ·         The above plans as previously stated are contingent
>>>>>>>>> upon you providing me a full travel itinerary including all flight details
>>>>>>>>> and arrangements for G***** while on travel.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Patrick <
>>>>>>>>> patrick@desireecapuano.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  You're the one going "round and round".  I HAVE reviewed the
>>>>>>>>>> previous emails, which is why I require clarification - first you stated
>>>>>>>>>> one set of requirements, then you stated a different set of requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You are grossly mistaken about the meaning and legal definition
>>>>>>>>>> of "including but not limited to".  You might want to review, for example,
>>>>>>>>>> some current case law on the matter.  Specifically, the "but not limited
>>>>>>>>>> to" means the previously stated list of requirements is NOT exhaustive and
>>>>>>>>>> MAY include additional, not explicitly stated, requirements.  Stop
>>>>>>>>>> pretending to be smarter than you are!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If what you wish to express is that you require specific
>>>>>>>>>> information then you should have phrased it as, for example:
>>>>>>>>>> "I will require x, y, z.  Additional information may be provided,
>>>>>>>>>> at your discretion, but is not required by me."
>>>>>>>>>> Based on your most recent email THAT is what you meant to say.
>>>>>>>>>> But that is 100% contrary to what you ACTUALLY said.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Since, literally, what you have said in your email dated
>>>>>>>>>> 2015-05-04 is that G***** is permitted to travel "between" the dates of
>>>>>>>>>> "May 24th and July 12th", with no additional exclusions or qualifications,
>>>>>>>>>> I am going to obtain G***** a flight from Phoenix to Vancouver for a date
>>>>>>>>>> which will be reasonable and cost effective.  I don't care if that is
>>>>>>>>>> conducive with your work schedule because there is no requirement that you
>>>>>>>>>> MUST personally transport him to the airport or be present at the time of
>>>>>>>>>> his departure.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In the event you are actually interested in better educating
>>>>>>>>>> yourself (since, clearly UoP hasn't done much for you in that respect),
>>>>>>>>>> here are a couple links regarding "including but not limited to":
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adamsdrafting.com/including-without-limitation/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.weagree.com/book/96-The+issue+of+%E2%80%98include%E2%80%99+and+
%E2%80%98without+limitation%E2%80%99.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/including-vs-including-without-
limit-48967/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.americancriminallawreview.com/aclr-online/overplaying-their-
hand-overly-broad-interpretive-canons-applied-including-not-limited-clauses/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 05/05/2015 12:59 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  I really don't have the time or patience for this.  You seem to
>>>>>>>>>> want to go round and round on questions that have already been answered.
>>>>>>>>>> You asked for a confirmation of dates and I gave it to you. If you require
>>>>>>>>>> additional calrification, read the previous emails in the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>  "Including but not limited to" means that I will accept any additional
>>>>>>>>>> information you have to provide, but I require the stated pieces of
>>>>>>>>>> information at a minimum.  Understanding the use of this term is covered
>>>>>>>>>> under basic reading comprehension.  The only other email correspondence
>>>>>>>>>> that needs to be provided is the travel itinerary.  There is no need for
>>>>>>>>>> any further discussion of the matter and as such I will not be responding
>>>>>>>>>> to anything else.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Good Day
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, May 4, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What additional information will you "need"?  Your response
>>>>>>>>>>> states "...including [sic] but not limited to...", which means that you
are
>>>>>>>>>>> reserving the right to add to the stated list.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Also, your most recent message (below) conflicts with the
>>>>>>>>>>> previous message, in that you are now stating G***** may travel
"between"
>>>>>>>>>>> the dates of May 24th and July 12th, whereas you previously stated he may
>>>>>>>>>>> depart Phoenix only on May 23, 24, 30 or 31.  So that I am clear: are you
>>>>>>>>>>> now saying he may depart Phoenix on other dates, as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/04/2015 09:07 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, G***** may travel for the purposes of visitation between
>>>>>>>>>>> the dates of May 24th and July 12th, 2015.  I will need the travel plans
>>>>>>>>>>> (itinerary) all flights G***** will be occupying, including but
>>>>>>>>>>> not limited to; the airline, day, time, flight number, confirmation
number,
>>>>>>>>>>> and destination.  This includes his flight from California to Vancouver.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, May 4, 2015, Patrick 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please provide a definitive response clearly stating whether or
>>>>>>>>>>>> not you are going to allow G***** to visit between the dates of May 24,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015 and July 12, 2015.  You're silence requires the other party (me) to
>>>>>>>>>>>> make assumptions, and assumptions are not admissible in court.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/26/2015 04:24 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What the fuck is wrong with your head?  Do you do this silly
>>>>>>>>>>>> shit just to be annoying is your whole life experience based on trailer
>>>>>>>>>>>> parks and TV?  Come back to reality for a second, will ya?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What the fuck do you mean by "itinerary"?!?!? That is such a
>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking vague term.  Be specific, you fucking idiot!  You're wasting my
>>>>>>>>>>>> time with all this stupid back and forth.  You pretend like you give a
shit
>>>>>>>>>>>> about G*****'s safety, demanding I provide an "itinerary" and that I
keep
>>>>>>>>>>>> on me documents to establish I'm someone I'm not - and the other 364
days
>>>>>>>>>>>> out of the year you don't put an ounce of interest into what's going on
>>>>>>>>>>>> with him.  Stop being such a fucking tool!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just shut the fuck up and be a normal person or just fucking go
>>>>>>>>>>>> away.  I don't need your stupid shit and I have better things to do than
>>>>>>>>>>>> try to jump through your hoops for your amusement.  You're just a
fucking
>>>>>>>>>>>> twit.  There is no documentation identifying me as Richard Riess and you
>>>>>>>>>>>> know it.  That deportation document is meaningless since the government
has
>>>>>>>>>>>> admitted that I'm not that person.  What the FUCK is wrong with you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And don't go telling G***** that the reason he can't come to
>>>>>>>>>>>> visit is because I didn't meet your "reasonable requirements".  Your
>>>>>>>>>>>> requirements are moronic and impossible to meet because they keep
changing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm done with you.  Let him visit or don't, it's your problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>> He and I both know that you have 100% of the authority to allow him to
>>>>>>>>>>>> visit and that it is entirely on you - not me.  He turns 16 in less than
a
>>>>>>>>>>>> year and a half and I'm pretty sure when that day arrives he's going to
say
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Fuck you!" and that will be the last you hear of him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Good day,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/26/2015 04:02 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  That sounds like an acceptable start to me.  However, as
>>>>>>>>>>>> already discussed, I will require a full itinerary for G*****'s summer
>>>>>>>>>>>> trip.  Upon my receipt of said itinerary, I will review it in full and
>>>>>>>>>>>> provide approval at such time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Also, please remember to keep a copy of your deportation
>>>>>>>>>>>> paperwork handy as you claim that is the only legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>