Mail

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
desiree.capuano@gmail.com
japendletonjr@gmail.com
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: G***** summer visitation 2015
From: Patrick <patrick@desireecapuano.com>
To: Desiree Capuano <desiree.capuano@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 06 2015 4:39:14 pm
Sorry, I meant to say "stupid fucking cunt".


On 05/06/2015 04:38 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
> Sure...as soon as you send me a travel itinerary.
>
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  > wrote:
>
>     Desiree:
>
>     Can you stop being a stupid fucking for even just a minute?
>
>     Patrick
>
>
>     On 05/06/2015 04:31 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>     You're right, I didn't call every single airline to check their
>>     age limitations for you.  Did you need me to do all of the
>>     research for you?  Do you need me to hold your hand through this
>>     whole process??
>>
>>     On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick >     > wrote:
>>
>>         Desiree:
>>
>>         Sure, and if he can be at PHX by 4:30am then there's a 6:37am
>>         flight on Air Canada for $395, with a 2:15 layover in San
>>         Fran, for a total travel time of 6:50; or there's a couple of
>>         6:11am Air Canadas for $463 with 2 stops for a travel time of
>>         10:17 and 11:47, respectively; or a 1:43 with one layover in
>>         Denver for $559, travel time: 7:26.
>>
>>         Do you do everything half-assed?  Can you just go away and
>>         shut up?  I don't believe that there is ANY way that your
>>         involvement in something would ever make it better so why
>>         don't you just go to your room and smoke some weed or something?
>>
>>         Patrick
>>
>>
>>         On 05/06/2015 04:15 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>         Air Canada allows it at 12 - I already called them.
>>>
>>>         On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick
>>>          wrote:
>>>
>>>             Desiree:
>>>
>>>             Do you realize that many airlines now do not let a
>>>             person under 15 travel alone?  Do you realize how that
>>>             limits the number of flights available to choose from? 
>>>             Do you ever look into things before you speak?
>>>
>>>             I am calling airlines right now.  If I am able to secure
>>>             a ticket I will let you know.
>>>
>>>             Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>>             On 05/06/2015 04:09 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>             I would assume with all that free time on your hands
>>>>             you would be able to secure G***** a plane ticket, yet
>>>>             I don't have a travel itinerary.
>>>>
>>>>             On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick
>>>>              wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Desiree:
>>>>
>>>>                 Last night I sent you an email requesting what you
>>>>                 will permit with respect to layover duration, et
>>>>                 cetera.  Why, when I request clarification of
>>>>                 anything from you, do you always refuse to provide
>>>>                 it?  You refuse to be clear - even when the other
>>>>                 party explicitly requests clarification - and then
>>>>                 later you try to accuse the other party of
>>>>                 "misinterpreting" what you meant.  Maybe if you
>>>>                 used the English language correctly clarification
>>>>                 would not be necessary.
>>>>
>>>>                 Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 On 05/06/2015 02:23 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>                 Once again - I don't see a travel itinerary.  Do
>>>>>                 you want to keep talking or do you want to see
>>>>>                 your son?  Are you seriously suggesting you would
>>>>>                 book G***** on a 15 hour flight?
>>>>>
>>>>>                 On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick
>>>>>                  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>                     Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>>                     That's wonderful.  You have never indicated
>>>>>                     that you would allow a flight which has
>>>>>                     connectors and based on your demonstrated
>>>>>                     refusal to allow your children any
>>>>>                     independence, one must assume that you would
>>>>>                     not be amenable to such flights.  I have,
>>>>>                     repeatedly, asked you whether such travel
>>>>>                     arrangements would be permissible and you have
>>>>>                     refused to respond.
>>>>>
>>>>>                     Are you saying that you're okay with a 15 hour
>>>>>                     flight, including a 10 hour layover in a
>>>>>                     distant city?  You may notice, the lowest
>>>>>                     priced direct flight is $965US, which is about
>>>>>                     $1200CDN.  You realize I would be paying in
>>>>>                     Canadian dollars, right?
>>>>>
>>>>>                     Why do you insist on blaming your fuck-ups and
>>>>>                     shortcomings on me?
>>>>>
>>>>>                     Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>                     On 05/06/2015 02:10 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>                     In case you have trouble navigating the link,
>>>>>>                     I took the liberty of taking screenshots for
>>>>>>                     you (there are 11 pages of flights to choose
>>>>>>                     from);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     Inline image 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Desiree
>>>>>>                     Capuano  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         I would appreciate it if you
>>>>>>                         would keep your emotions in check as we
>>>>>>                         attempt to discuss and resolve this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         Did I ever once say I needed to know
>>>>>>                         where G***** was going to be every
>>>>>>                         single minute of every single day?  No, I
>>>>>>                         haven't.  I told you specifically what
>>>>>>                         information I needed, which was regarding
>>>>>>                         the plane/flight information ONLY but you
>>>>>>                         wanted to argue about the meaning of
>>>>>>                         "including but not limited to".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         You never once asked me to work with you
>>>>>>                         on the date of his departure, you
>>>>>>                         demanded it and only AFTER I said 'No'
>>>>>>                         did you bring up that it was about the cost.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                          With all your threats to "destroy me",
>>>>>>                         the emails you've sent to my work, and
>>>>>>                         that horrendous website still up
>>>>>>                         and being hosted from your home computer
>>>>>>                         - what makes you think that I should do
>>>>>>                         ANYTHING to help you out? Tell me exactly
>>>>>>                         why I am responsible for taking time off
>>>>>>                         of work to accommodate you? Where
>>>>>>                         exactly does it say that I am required to
>>>>>>                         in the court decree?  Please show me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         See - you still don't get it.  If you had
>>>>>>                         come to me and said "hey, flights are
>>>>>>                         cheaper on Wednesday and I would really
>>>>>>                         appreciate it if you would work with me
>>>>>>                         on G*****'s travel" I would have done
>>>>>>                         it.  Even after everything you have done
>>>>>>                         (especially beginning in March).  The
>>>>>>                         fight here is one sided, always has been.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         Now to wrap this up, I do NOT need (from
>>>>>>                         you or Liz);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         /1. a detailed plan for a journey,
>>>>>>                         especially a list of places to visit;
>>>>>>                         plan of travel. /
>>>>>>                         /
>>>>>>                         2. a line of travel; route./
>>>>>>                         /
>>>>>>                         /
>>>>>>                         /3. an account of a journey; record of
>>>>>>                         travel./
>>>>>>                         /
>>>>>>                         4. a book describing a route or routes of
>>>>>>                         travel with information helpful to
>>>>>>                         travelers; guidebook for travelers./
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         What I need is the same thing you have
>>>>>>                         sent me for every other visitation
>>>>>>                         G***** has had to see you - the
>>>>>>                         confirmation from the airline that
>>>>>>                         includes the flight information
>>>>>>                         (generally referred to as a "travel
>>>>>>                         itinerary" - I can copy and paste a
>>>>>>                         picture of one of you still need it for
>>>>>>                         reference).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                          I just did a search on Google and found
>>>>>>                         the following;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         http://www.kayak.com/flights/PHX-YVR/2015-05-24
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         I gave you the travel dates on April
>>>>>>                         20th. You could have purchase a ticket at
>>>>>>                         any point in the last 2 weeks.  Instead
>>>>>>                         you want to quibble over dictionary
>>>>>>                         definitions and cite case law and now
>>>>>>                         there are no reasonable flights left that
>>>>>>                         are non-stop.  So I guess I have no
>>>>>>                         choice but to allow a layover, unless you
>>>>>>                         want to explain to Liz that you were
>>>>>>                         incorrect in your interpretation of what
>>>>>>                         I said. Regardless of where he's
>>>>>>                         traveling to, send me the flight
>>>>>>                         confirmation.  Or don't and we can most
>>>>>>                         certainly take this back to court and you
>>>>>>                         can plead your case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         Cheerio
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         On Tuesday, May 5, 2015, Patrick
>>>>>>                          wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             Desiree:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             How am I the one making it
>>>>>>                             complicated when you're the one
>>>>>>                             changing your demands?  Please see my
>>>>>>                             further comments below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             On 05/05/2015 08:55 PM, Desiree
>>>>>>                             Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             Ricky,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             This is just unnecessarily
>>>>>>>                             complicated. Even for you. Let me
>>>>>>>                             make this VERY simple so that you
>>>>>>>                             can follow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             1.As stated on the email 05/04/2015
>>>>>>>                             which you cited, Gariel's
>>>>>>>                             permissible time period for
>>>>>>>                             visitation with you is between May
>>>>>>>                             24th, 2015 and July 12th, 2015. 
>>>>>>>                             This means that the EARLIEST he may
>>>>>>>                             leave Arizona is May 24th, and the
>>>>>>>                             LATEST that G***** may be returned
>>>>>>>                             to my custody is July 12th, 2015.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             2.As stated previously as well,
>>>>>>>                             G***** is to depart Arizona on a
>>>>>>>                             weekend, and be returned on a
>>>>>>>                             weekend within the above stated time
>>>>>>>                             period of visitation. NOT a week
>>>>>>>                             day.  G***** and I have both looked
>>>>>>>                             up the prices for tickets, and there
>>>>>>>                             is not a significant price
>>>>>>>                             difference between equivalent
>>>>>>>                             weekend and week day flights as you
>>>>>>>                             (falsely) stated previously. This is
>>>>>>>                             not a significant financial hardship.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             In your email dated 2015-05-04 you
>>>>>>                             stated, and I'm quoting, "G*****
>>>>>>                             *may travel* for the purposes
>>>>>>                             of visitation *between the dates
>>>>>>                             of* May 24th and July 12th, 2015"
>>>>>>                             (emphasis added). You stated, in your
>>>>>>                             own words, in writing, that G*****
>>>>>>                             may travel between the two stated
>>>>>>                             dates and you did not further qualify it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             You still have not provided a reason
>>>>>>                             as to WHY you will not permit G*****
>>>>>>                             to travel on a weekday.  Contrary to
>>>>>>                             your grossly misinformed belief, you
>>>>>>                             ARE required to provide a reason
>>>>>>                             under these circumstances. You need
>>>>>>                             to find yourself a better legal advisor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             You are full of shit about the cost
>>>>>>                             of the flights.  A flight on May 27,
>>>>>>                             28 is $150 - $180; on May 24 it's
>>>>>>                             $1300, on May 30, 31 it $550 and up. 
>>>>>>                             How is that not a significant
>>>>>>                             difference?  If you're going to make
>>>>>>                             such claims then provide proof. 
>>>>>>                             Where did you find such ticket prices?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             3.You and I have already discussed a
>>>>>>>                             situation where by you have an
>>>>>>>                             option for G***** to fly to LA to
>>>>>>>                             visit with Liz on a weekend, then
>>>>>>>                             fly to visit you in Canada during a
>>>>>>>                             week day.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             You have imposed unreasonable
>>>>>>                             requirements on allowing G***** to
>>>>>>                             fly to LA.  You insist that you
>>>>>>                             require a complete itinerary but then
>>>>>>                             you refuse to clarify exactly what
>>>>>>                             information you are demanding.  That
>>>>>>                             is the same stupid single mother
>>>>>>                             bullshit my mother did when I was a
>>>>>>                             kid and I'm not going to waste my
>>>>>>                             time on it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             4.The above visitation as previously
>>>>>>>                             stated ALSO is contingent upon a
>>>>>>>                             full travel itinerary including all
>>>>>>>                             flight and travel plans. You've done
>>>>>>>                             this before, so it shouldn't be
>>>>>>>                             difficult or a surprise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             Go look up the word "itinerary", you
>>>>>>                             fucking moron!  What fucking language
>>>>>>                             do you speak?  Is it some made up
>>>>>>                             version of English?  Is it because
>>>>>>                             your American that you're such an
>>>>>>                             idiot?  Let me help you (from
>>>>>>                             dictionary.reference.com
>>>>>>                             ):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                                 itinerary
>>>>>>                                 noun, plural itineraries.
>>>>>>                                 1. a detailed plan for a journey,
>>>>>>                                 especially a list of places to
>>>>>>                                 visit; plan of travel.
>>>>>>                                 2. a line of travel; route.
>>>>>>                                 3. an account of a journey;
>>>>>>                                 record of travel.
>>>>>>                                 4. a book describing a route or
>>>>>>                                 routes of travel with information
>>>>>>                                 helpful to travelers; guidebook
>>>>>>                                 for travelers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             So what the fuck are you asking for? 
>>>>>>                             Just the flight information?  Do you
>>>>>>                             want to know exactly where he is
>>>>>>                             going to be each day?  Be more
>>>>>>                             fucking specific you fucking idiot!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             Fuck you, and fuck your stupid, white
>>>>>>                             trash, single mother bullshit games. 
>>>>>>                             I'm going to get him a ticket for the
>>>>>>                             27th or 28th and if you don't allow
>>>>>>                             him to leave then I get to show the
>>>>>>                             court that not once, but twice now
>>>>>>                             you've refused to allow him to visit
>>>>>>                             during his extended school breaks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             Good day, I'm not reading any further
>>>>>>                             because your stupidity hurts my head.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             *_Recap_*:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             ·Travel between 05/24/2015-07/12/2015.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             ·Travel FROM Arizona on Weekends
>>>>>>>                             within the above listed dates
>>>>>>>                             (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             ·Travel TO Arizona on Weekends
>>>>>>>                             within the above listed dates
>>>>>>>                             (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             ·Visitation with Liz is permissible,
>>>>>>>                             and up front visitation which has
>>>>>>>                             also been discussed is also
>>>>>>>                             permissible as long as I am apprised
>>>>>>>                             of G*****'s location and the plans.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             ·The above plans as previously
>>>>>>>                             stated are contingent upon you
>>>>>>>                             providing me a full travel itinerary
>>>>>>>                             including all flight details and
>>>>>>>                             arrangements for G***** while on
>>>>>>>                             travel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:38 PM,
>>>>>>>                             Patrick
>>>>>>>                              wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                                 You're the one going "round and
>>>>>>>                                 round".  I HAVE reviewed the
>>>>>>>                                 previous emails, which is why I
>>>>>>>                                 require clarification - first
>>>>>>>                                 you stated one set of
>>>>>>>                                 requirements, then you stated a
>>>>>>>                                 different set of requirements.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                                 You are grossly mistaken about
>>>>>>>                                 the meaning and legal definition
>>>>>>>                                 of "including but not limited
>>>>>>>                                 to".  You might want to review,
>>>>>>>                                 for example, some current case
>>>>>>>                                 law on the matter. Specifically,
>>>>>>>                                 the "but not limited to" means
>>>>>>>                                 the previously stated list of
>>>>>>>                                 requirements is NOT exhaustive
>>>>>>>                                 and MAY include additional, not
>>>>>>>                                 explicitly stated, requirements.
>>>>>>>                                 Stop pretending to be smarter
>>>>>>>                                 than you are!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                                 If what you wish to express is
>>>>>>>                                 that you require specific
>>>>>>>                                 information then you should have
>>>>>>>                                 phrased it as, for example:
>>>>>>>                                 "I will require x, y, z. 
>>>>>>>                                 Additional information may be
>>>>>>>                                 provided, at your discretion,
>>>>>>>                                 but is not required by me."
>>>>>>>                                 Based on your most recent email
>>>>>>>                                 THAT is what you meant to say. 
>>>>>>>                                 But that is 100% contrary to
>>>>>>>                                 what you ACTUALLY said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                                 Since, literally, what you have
>>>>>>>                                 said in your email dated
>>>>>>>                                 2015-05-04 is that G***** is
>>>>>>>                                 permitted to travel "between"
>>>>>>>                                 the dates of "May 24th and July
>>>>>>>                                 12th", with no additional
>>>>>>>                                 exclusions or qualifications, I
>>>>>>>                                 am going to obtain G***** a
>>>>>>>                                 flight from Phoenix to Vancouver
>>>>>>>                                 for a date which will be
>>>>>>>                                 reasonable and cost effective. 
>>>>>>>                                 I don't care if that is
>>>>>>>                                 conducive with your work
>>>>>>>                                 schedule because there is no
>>>>>>>                                 requirement that you MUST
>>>>>>>                                 personally transport him to the
>>>>>>>                                 airport or be present at the
>>>>>>>                                 time of his departure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                                 In the event you are actually
>>>>>>>                                 interested in better educating
>>>>>>>                                 yourself (since, clearly UoP
>>>>>>>                                 hasn't done much for you in that
>>>>>>>                                 respect), here are a couple
>>>>>>>                                 links regarding "including but
>>>>>>>                                 not limited to":
>>>>>>>                                 http://www.adamsdrafting.com/including-
without-limitation/
>>>>>>>                                 http://www.weagree.com/book/96-The+issue+of+%
E2%80%98include%E2%80%99+and+%E2%80%98without+limitation%E2%80%99.html
>>>>>>>                                 http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/including-
vs-including-without-limit-48967/
>>>>>>>                                 http://www.americancriminallawreview.com
/aclr-online/overplaying-their-hand-overly-broad-interpretive-canons-applied-
including-not-limited-clauses/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                                 Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                                 On 05/05/2015 12:59 PM, Desiree
>>>>>>>                                 Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>                                 Ricky,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                 I really don't have the time or
>>>>>>>>                                 patience for this.  You seem to
>>>>>>>>                                 want to go round and round on
>>>>>>>>                                 questions that have already
>>>>>>>>                                 been answered.  You asked for a
>>>>>>>>                                 confirmation of dates and I
>>>>>>>>                                 gave it to you. If you require
>>>>>>>>                                 additional calrification, read
>>>>>>>>                                 the previous emails in the
>>>>>>>>                                 thread.  "Including but not
>>>>>>>>                                 limited to" means that I will
>>>>>>>>                                 accept any additional
>>>>>>>>                                 information you have to
>>>>>>>>                                 provide, but I require the
>>>>>>>>                                 stated pieces of information at
>>>>>>>>                                 a minimum. Understanding the
>>>>>>>>                                 use of this term is covered
>>>>>>>>                                 under basic reading
>>>>>>>>                                 comprehension. The only other
>>>>>>>>                                 email correspondence that needs
>>>>>>>>                                 to be provided is the travel
>>>>>>>>                                 itinerary. There is no need for
>>>>>>>>                                 any further discussion of the
>>>>>>>>                                 matter and as such I will not
>>>>>>>>                                 be responding to anything else.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                 Good Day
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                 On Monday, May 4, 2015, Patrick
>>>>>>>>                                 
>>>>>>>>                                 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                     Desiree:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                     What additional information
>>>>>>>>                                     will you "need"?  Your
>>>>>>>>                                     response states
>>>>>>>>                                     "...including [sic] but not
>>>>>>>>                                     limited to...", which means
>>>>>>>>                                     that you are reserving the
>>>>>>>>                                     right to add to the stated
>>>>>>>>                                     list.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                     Also, your most recent
>>>>>>>>                                     message (below) conflicts
>>>>>>>>                                     with the previous message,
>>>>>>>>                                     in that you are now stating
>>>>>>>>                                     G***** may travel
>>>>>>>>                                     "between" the dates of May
>>>>>>>>                                     24th and July 12th, whereas
>>>>>>>>                                     you previously stated he
>>>>>>>>                                     may depart Phoenix only on
>>>>>>>>                                     May 23, 24, 30 or 31.  So
>>>>>>>>                                     that I am clear: are you
>>>>>>>>                                     now saying he may depart
>>>>>>>>                                     Phoenix on other dates, as
>>>>>>>>                                     well?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                     Patrick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                     On 05/04/2015 09:07 PM,
>>>>>>>>                                     Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>                                     Yes, G***** may travel
>>>>>>>>>                                     for the purposes
>>>>>>>>>                                     of visitation between the
>>>>>>>>>                                     dates of May 24th and July
>>>>>>>>>                                     12th, 2015.  I will need
>>>>>>>>>                                     the travel plans
>>>>>>>>>                                     (itinerary) all flights
>>>>>>>>>                                     G***** will be occupying,
>>>>>>>>>                                     including but not limited
>>>>>>>>>                                     to; the airline, day,
>>>>>>>>>                                     time, flight
>>>>>>>>>                                     number, confirmation
>>>>>>>>>                                     number, and destination.
>>>>>>>>>                                     This includes his flight
>>>>>>>>>                                     from California to Vancouver.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                     On Monday, May 4, 2015,
>>>>>>>>>                                     Patrick
>>>>>>>>>                                     
>>>>>>>>>                                     wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                         Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                         Please provide a
>>>>>>>>>                                         definitive response
>>>>>>>>>                                         clearly stating
>>>>>>>>>                                         whether or not you are
>>>>>>>>>                                         going to allow G*****
>>>>>>>>>                                         to visit between the
>>>>>>>>>                                         dates of May 24, 2015
>>>>>>>>>                                         and July 12, 2015. 
>>>>>>>>>                                         You're silence
>>>>>>>>>                                         requires the other
>>>>>>>>>                                         party (me) to make
>>>>>>>>>                                         assumptions, and
>>>>>>>>>                                         assumptions are not
>>>>>>>>>                                         admissible in court.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                         Patrick
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                         On 04/26/2015 04:24
>>>>>>>>>                                         PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>                                         Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                         What the fuck is
>>>>>>>>>>                                         wrong with your
>>>>>>>>>>                                         head?  Do you do this
>>>>>>>>>>                                         silly shit just to be
>>>>>>>>>>                                         annoying is your
>>>>>>>>>>                                         whole life experience
>>>>>>>>>>                                         based on trailer
>>>>>>>>>>                                         parks and TV?  Come
>>>>>>>>>>                                         back to reality for a
>>>>>>>>>>                                         second, will ya?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                         What the fuck do you
>>>>>>>>>>                                         mean by
>>>>>>>>>>                                         "itinerary"?!?!? That
>>>>>>>>>>                                         is such a fucking
>>>>>>>>>>                                         vague term.  Be
>>>>>>>>>>                                         specific, you fucking
>>>>>>>>>>                                         idiot!  You're
>>>>>>>>>>                                         wasting my time with
>>>>>>>>>>                                         all this stupid back
>>>>>>>>>>                                         and forth.  You
>>>>>>>>>>                                         pretend like you give
>>>>>>>>>>                                         a shit about
>>>>>>>>>>                                         G*****'s safety,
>>>>>>>>>>                                         demanding I provide
>>>>>>>>>>                                         an "itinerary" and
>>>>>>>>>>                                         that I keep on me
>>>>>>>>>>                                         documents to
>>>>>>>>>>                                         establish I'm someone
>>>>>>>>>>                                         I'm not - and the
>>>>>>>>>>                                         other 364 days out of
>>>>>>>>>>                                         the year you don't
>>>>>>>>>>                                         put an ounce of
>>>>>>>>>>                                         interest into what's
>>>>>>>>>>                                         going on with him. 
>>>>>>>>>>                                         Stop being such a
>>>>>>>>>>                                         fucking tool!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                         Just shut the fuck up
>>>>>>>>>>                                         and be a normal
>>>>>>>>>>                                         person or just
>>>>>>>>>>                                         fucking go away.  I
>>>>>>>>>>                                         don't need your
>>>>>>>>>>                                         stupid shit and I
>>>>>>>>>>                                         have better things to
>>>>>>>>>>                                         do than try to jump
>>>>>>>>>>                                         through your hoops
>>>>>>>>>>                                         for your amusement.
>>>>>>>>>>                                         You're just a fucking
>>>>>>>>>>                                         twit. There is no
>>>>>>>>>>                                         documentation
>>>>>>>>>>                                         identifying me as
>>>>>>>>>>                                         Richard and you
>>>>>>>>>>                                         know it.  That
>>>>>>>>>>                                         deportation document
>>>>>>>>>>                                         is meaningless since
>>>>>>>>>>                                         the government has
>>>>>>>>>>                                         admitted that I'm not
>>>>>>>>>>                                         that person.  What
>>>>>>>>>>                                         the FUCK is wrong
>>>>>>>>>>                                         with you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                         And don't go telling
>>>>>>>>>>                                         G***** that the
>>>>>>>>>>                                         reason he can't come
>>>>>>>>>>                                         to visit is because I
>>>>>>>>>>                                         didn't meet your
>>>>>>>>>>                                         "reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>                                         requirements". Your
>>>>>>>>>>                                         requirements are
>>>>>>>>>>                                         moronic and
>>>>>>>>>>                                         impossible to meet
>>>>>>>>>>                                         because they keep
>>>>>>>>>>                                         changing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                         I'm done with you. 
>>>>>>>>>>                                         Let him visit or
>>>>>>>>>>                                         don't, it's your
>>>>>>>>>>                                         problem. He and I
>>>>>>>>>>                                         both know that you
>>>>>>>>>>                                         have 100% of the
>>>>>>>>>>                                         authority to allow
>>>>>>>>>>                                         him to visit and that
>>>>>>>>>>                                         it is entirely on you
>>>>>>>>>>                                         - not me. He turns 16
>>>>>>>>>>                                         in less than a year
>>>>>>>>>>                                         and a half and I'm
>>>>>>>>>>                                         pretty sure when that
>>>>>>>>>>                                         day arrives he's
>>>>>>>>>>                                         going to say "Fuck
>>>>>>>>>>                                         you!" and that will
>>>>>>>>>>                                         be the last you hear
>>>>>>>>>>                                         of him.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                         Good day,
>>>>>>>>>>                                         Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                         On 04/26/2015 04:02
>>>>>>>>>>                                         PM, Desiree Capuano
>>>>>>>>>>                                         wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         That sounds like an
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         acceptable start to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         me. However, as
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         already discussed, I
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         will require a full
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         itinerary for
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         G*****'s summer
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         trip. Upon my
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         receipt of said
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         itinerary, I will
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         review it in full
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         and provide approval
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         at such time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         Also, please
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         remember to keep a
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         copy of your
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         deportation
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         paperwork handy as
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         you claim that is
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         the only legal
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         document in your
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         possession
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         identifying you as
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         Richard 
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         (G*****'s father).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         ~Desiree
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         On Sunday, April 26,
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         2015, Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             I have
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             confirmed, with
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Liz, that she
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             would pick up
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             G***** from LAX
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             on May 24, 2015
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             and she would
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             bring him to LAX
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             on May 27, 2015
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             or May 28, 2015
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             to travel to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Vancouver, BC. 
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             During the time
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             G***** would be
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             in Los Angeles,
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             he would be
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             staying at Liz's
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             residence.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Is that
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             acceptable to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             you?  And, if
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             so, do you agree
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             to permit
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             G***** to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             travel from
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Phoenix, AZ to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Los Angeles, CA
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             on May 24, 2015,
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             then from Los
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Angeles, CA to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Vancouver, BC on
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             May 28, 2015?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             On 04/26/2015
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             11:35 AM,
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Patrick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             I'm unclear -
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             your "previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             correspondence"
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             stated that
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             G*****
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             traveling to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             California was
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             contingent on
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             your express
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             notice and
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             consent.  But
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             you now seem to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             be saying that
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             pre-authorized
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             by you and that
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             you just
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             require "full
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             itinerary
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             including
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             flight and
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             contact
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             information".
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             May you please
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             try to be a
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             little more
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             clear and
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             consistent in
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             your communication?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             I will speak
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             relevant
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             parties in Los
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Angeles and get
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             back to you
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             with confirmations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Responses to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             your statements:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             1. You are
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             correct that
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             you are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             required, not
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             legally anyway,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             to justify your
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             decisions to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             me.  However,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             your refusal to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             provide a
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             rationale for
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             your decisions
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             is evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             that such
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             decisions are
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             arbitrary and
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             NOT based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             rationale or on
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             what is in
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             G*****'s best
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             interests. And
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             child rearing
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             (or leading, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             general)
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             arbitrarily, as
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             opposed to by
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             rational
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             consideration
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             and democratic
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             processes is
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             fascist and
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             dictatorial. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             have been, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             I believe I
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             have now,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             proven that
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             that is your
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             approach to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             raising
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             children (if
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             not your
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             approach to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             life, in general).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             In the past,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             when I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             attempted to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             implement a
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             rule, I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             always allowed
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             G***** the
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             opportunity to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             question it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             rationale and,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             on more than
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             one occasion he
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             has pointed out
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             that there was
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             no logical
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             basis for it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             In such cases I
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             have conceded
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             that he was
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             correct and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             rule was either
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             abandoned or
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             modified
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             appropriately.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             THAT is my
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             approach to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             raising
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             children - and
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             to life in
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             general.  That
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             is why I am a
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             better person
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             than you and
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             why G*****
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             will always
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             respect me,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             while he fears
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Personally, I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             rather have
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             someone's
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             earned respect
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             than to have
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             their fear. But
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             that's just me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             2. I am not
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             "failing to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             comply", as you
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             put it.  I am
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             proposing
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             alternatives to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             what you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             mandated, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             order to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             more cost
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             effective
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             travel
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             arrangements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             Alternatives
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             which would not
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             affect you in
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             any way
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             whatsoever
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             because you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             not the one
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             traveling. You
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             are proving
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             that you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             completely
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             unwilling to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             have ANY
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             flexibility in
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             this matter -
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             even though it
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             does not affect
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             you in any way at 
>>>>>>>>>>>