Mail

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
desiree.capuano@gmail.com
japendletonjr@gmail.com
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: G***** summer visitation 2015
From: Patrick <patrick@desireecapuano.com>
To: Desiree Capuano <desiree.capuano@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 06 2015 4:36:53 pm
Desiree:

Can you stop being a stupid fucking for even just a minute?

Patrick


On 05/06/2015 04:31 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
> You're right, I didn't call every single airline to check their age 
> limitations for you.  Did you need me to do all of the research for 
> you?  Do you need me to hold your hand through this whole process??
>
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  > wrote:
>
>     Desiree:
>
>     Sure, and if he can be at PHX by 4:30am then there's a 6:37am
>     flight on Air Canada for $395, with a 2:15 layover in San Fran,
>     for a total travel time of 6:50; or there's a couple of 6:11am Air
>     Canadas for $463 with 2 stops for a travel time of 10:17 and
>     11:47, respectively; or a 1:43 with one layover in Denver for
>     $559, travel time: 7:26.
>
>     Do you do everything half-assed?  Can you just go away and shut
>     up?  I don't believe that there is ANY way that your involvement
>     in something would ever make it better so why don't you just go to
>     your room and smoke some weed or something?
>
>     Patrick
>
>
>     On 05/06/2015 04:15 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>     Air Canada allows it at 12 - I already called them.
>>
>>     On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick >     > wrote:
>>
>>         Desiree:
>>
>>         Do you realize that many airlines now do not let a person
>>         under 15 travel alone?  Do you realize how that limits the
>>         number of flights available to choose from? Do you ever look
>>         into things before you speak?
>>
>>         I am calling airlines right now.  If I am able to secure a
>>         ticket I will let you know.
>>
>>         Patrick
>>
>>
>>         On 05/06/2015 04:09 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>         I would assume with all that free time on your hands you
>>>         would be able to secure G***** a plane ticket, yet I don't
>>>         have a travel itinerary.
>>>
>>>         On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick
>>>          wrote:
>>>
>>>             Desiree:
>>>
>>>             Last night I sent you an email requesting what you will
>>>             permit with respect to layover duration, et cetera. 
>>>             Why, when I request clarification of anything from you,
>>>             do you always refuse to provide it?  You refuse to be
>>>             clear - even when the other party explicitly requests
>>>             clarification - and then later you try to accuse the
>>>             other party of "misinterpreting" what you meant.  Maybe
>>>             if you used the English language correctly clarification
>>>             would not be necessary.
>>>
>>>             Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>>             On 05/06/2015 02:23 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>             Once again - I don't see a travel itinerary.  Do you
>>>>             want to keep talking or do you want to see your son? 
>>>>             Are you seriously suggesting you would book G***** on
>>>>             a 15 hour flight?
>>>>
>>>>             On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick
>>>>              wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Desiree:
>>>>
>>>>                 That's wonderful.  You have never indicated that
>>>>                 you would allow a flight which has connectors and
>>>>                 based on your demonstrated refusal to allow your
>>>>                 children any independence, one must assume that you
>>>>                 would not be amenable to such flights.  I have,
>>>>                 repeatedly, asked you whether such travel
>>>>                 arrangements would be permissible and you have
>>>>                 refused to respond.
>>>>
>>>>                 Are you saying that you're okay with a 15 hour
>>>>                 flight, including a 10 hour layover in a distant
>>>>                 city?  You may notice, the lowest priced direct
>>>>                 flight is $965US, which is about $1200CDN.  You
>>>>                 realize I would be paying in Canadian dollars, right?
>>>>
>>>>                 Why do you insist on blaming your fuck-ups and
>>>>                 shortcomings on me?
>>>>
>>>>                 Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 On 05/06/2015 02:10 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>                 In case you have trouble navigating the link, I
>>>>>                 took the liberty of taking screenshots for you
>>>>>                 (there are 11 pages of flights to choose from);
>>>>>
>>>>>                 Inline image 1
>>>>>
>>>>>                 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Desiree Capuano
>>>>>                  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>                     I would appreciate it if you would keep your
>>>>>                     emotions in check as we attempt to discuss and
>>>>>                     resolve this.
>>>>>
>>>>>                     Did I ever once say I needed to know where
>>>>>                     G***** was going to be every single minute of
>>>>>                     every single day?  No, I haven't.  I told you
>>>>>                     specifically what information I needed, which
>>>>>                     was regarding the plane/flight information
>>>>>                     ONLY but you wanted to argue about the meaning
>>>>>                     of "including but not limited to".
>>>>>
>>>>>                     You never once asked me to work with you on
>>>>>                     the date of his departure, you demanded it and
>>>>>                     only AFTER I said 'No' did you bring up that
>>>>>                     it was about the cost.
>>>>>
>>>>>                      With all your threats to "destroy me", the
>>>>>                     emails you've sent to my work, and that
>>>>>                     horrendous website still up and being hosted
>>>>>                     from your home computer - what makes you think
>>>>>                     that I should do ANYTHING to help you out? 
>>>>>                     Tell me exactly why I am responsible for
>>>>>                     taking time off of work to accommodate you?
>>>>>                     Where exactly does it say that I am required
>>>>>                     to in the court decree?  Please show me.
>>>>>
>>>>>                     See - you still don't get it.  If you had come
>>>>>                     to me and said "hey, flights are cheaper on
>>>>>                     Wednesday and I would really appreciate it if
>>>>>                     you would work with me on G*****'s travel" I
>>>>>                     would have done it.  Even after everything you
>>>>>                     have done (especially beginning in March). 
>>>>>                     The fight here is one sided, always has been.
>>>>>
>>>>>                     Now to wrap this up, I do NOT need (from you
>>>>>                     or Liz);
>>>>>
>>>>>                     /1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially
>>>>>                     a list of places to visit; plan of travel. /
>>>>>                     /
>>>>>                     2. a line of travel; route./
>>>>>                     /
>>>>>                     /
>>>>>                     /3. an account of a journey; record of travel./
>>>>>                     /
>>>>>                     4. a book describing a route or routes of
>>>>>                     travel with information helpful to travelers;
>>>>>                     guidebook for travelers./
>>>>>
>>>>>                     What I need is the same thing you have sent me
>>>>>                     for every other visitation G***** has had to
>>>>>                     see you - the confirmation from the airline
>>>>>                     that includes the flight information
>>>>>                     (generally referred to as a "travel itinerary"
>>>>>                     - I can copy and paste a picture of one of you
>>>>>                     still need it for reference).
>>>>>
>>>>>                      I just did a search on Google and found the
>>>>>                     following;
>>>>>
>>>>>                     http://www.kayak.com/flights/PHX-YVR/2015-05-24
>>>>>
>>>>>                     I gave you the travel dates on April 20th. 
>>>>>                     You could have purchase a ticket at any point
>>>>>                     in the last 2 weeks. Instead you want to
>>>>>                     quibble over dictionary definitions and cite
>>>>>                     case law and now there are no reasonable
>>>>>                     flights left that are non-stop.  So I guess I
>>>>>                     have no choice but to allow a layover, unless
>>>>>                     you want to explain to Liz that you were
>>>>>                     incorrect in your interpretation of what I
>>>>>                     said. Regardless of where he's traveling to,
>>>>>                     send me the flight confirmation.  Or don't and
>>>>>                     we can most certainly take this back to court
>>>>>                     and you can plead your case.
>>>>>
>>>>>                     Cheerio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>                     On Tuesday, May 5, 2015, Patrick
>>>>>                      wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>                         Desiree:
>>>>>
>>>>>                         How am I the one making it complicated
>>>>>                         when you're the one changing your
>>>>>                         demands?  Please see my further comments
>>>>>                         below.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>                         On 05/05/2015 08:55 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         Ricky,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         This is just unnecessarily complicated.
>>>>>>                         Even for you. Let me make this VERY
>>>>>>                         simple so that you can follow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         1.As stated on the email 05/04/2015 which
>>>>>>                         you cited, Gariel's permissible time
>>>>>>                         period for visitation with you is between
>>>>>>                         May 24th, 2015 and July 12th, 2015.  This
>>>>>>                         means that the EARLIEST he may leave
>>>>>>                         Arizona is May 24th, and the LATEST that
>>>>>>                         G***** may be returned to my custody is
>>>>>>                         July 12th, 2015.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         2.As stated previously as well, G*****
>>>>>>                         is to depart Arizona on a weekend, and be
>>>>>>                         returned on a weekend within the above
>>>>>>                         stated time period of visitation.  NOT a
>>>>>>                         week day.  G***** and I have both looked
>>>>>>                         up the prices for tickets, and there is
>>>>>>                         not a significant price difference
>>>>>>                         between equivalent weekend and week day
>>>>>>                         flights as you (falsely) stated
>>>>>>                         previously.  This is not a significant
>>>>>>                         financial hardship.
>>>>>>
>>>>>                         In your email dated 2015-05-04 you stated,
>>>>>                         and I'm quoting, "G***** *may travel* for
>>>>>                         the purposes of visitation *between the
>>>>>                         dates of* May 24th and July 12th, 2015"
>>>>>                         (emphasis added). You stated, in your own
>>>>>                         words, in writing, that G***** may travel
>>>>>                         between the two stated dates and you did
>>>>>                         not further qualify it.
>>>>>
>>>>>                         You still have not provided a reason as to
>>>>>                         WHY you will not permit G***** to travel
>>>>>                         on a weekday.  Contrary to your grossly
>>>>>                         misinformed belief, you ARE required to
>>>>>                         provide a reason under these
>>>>>                         circumstances.  You need to find yourself
>>>>>                         a better legal advisor.
>>>>>
>>>>>                         You are full of shit about the cost of the
>>>>>                         flights.  A flight on May 27, 28 is $150 -
>>>>>                         $180; on May 24 it's $1300, on May 30, 31
>>>>>                         it $550 and up.  How is that not a
>>>>>                         significant difference?  If you're going
>>>>>                         to make such claims then provide proof. 
>>>>>                         Where did you find such ticket prices?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         3.You and I have already discussed a
>>>>>>                         situation where by you have an option for
>>>>>>                         G***** to fly to LA to visit with Liz on
>>>>>>                         a weekend, then fly to visit you in
>>>>>>                         Canada during a week day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>                         You have imposed unreasonable requirements
>>>>>                         on allowing G***** to fly to LA. You
>>>>>                         insist that you require a complete
>>>>>                         itinerary but then you refuse to clarify
>>>>>                         exactly what information you are
>>>>>                         demanding.  That is the same stupid single
>>>>>                         mother bullshit my mother did when I was a
>>>>>                         kid and I'm not going to waste my time on it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         4.The above visitation as previously
>>>>>>                         stated ALSO is contingent upon a full
>>>>>>                         travel itinerary including all flight and
>>>>>>                         travel plans. You've done this before, so
>>>>>>                         it shouldn't be difficult or a surprise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>                         Go look up the word "itinerary", you
>>>>>                         fucking moron!  What fucking language do
>>>>>                         you speak? Is it some made up version of
>>>>>                         English?  Is it because your American that
>>>>>                         you're such an idiot?  Let me help you
>>>>>                         (from dictionary.reference.com
>>>>>                         ):
>>>>>
>>>>>                             itinerary
>>>>>                             noun, plural itineraries.
>>>>>                             1. a detailed plan for a journey,
>>>>>                             especially a list of places to visit;
>>>>>                             plan of travel.
>>>>>                             2. a line of travel; route.
>>>>>                             3. an account of a journey; record of
>>>>>                             travel.
>>>>>                             4. a book describing a route or routes
>>>>>                             of travel with information helpful to
>>>>>                             travelers; guidebook for travelers.
>>>>>
>>>>>                         So what the fuck are you asking for?  Just
>>>>>                         the flight information?  Do you want to
>>>>>                         know exactly where he is going to be each
>>>>>                         day?  Be more fucking specific you fucking
>>>>>                         idiot!
>>>>>
>>>>>                         Fuck you, and fuck your stupid, white
>>>>>                         trash, single mother bullshit games.  I'm
>>>>>                         going to get him a ticket for the 27th or
>>>>>                         28th and if you don't allow him to leave
>>>>>                         then I get to show the court that not
>>>>>                         once, but twice now you've refused to
>>>>>                         allow him to visit during his extended
>>>>>                         school breaks.
>>>>>
>>>>>                         Good day, I'm not reading any further
>>>>>                         because your stupidity hurts my head.
>>>>>
>>>>>                         Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         *_Recap_*:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         ·Travel between 05/24/2015-07/12/2015.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         ·Travel FROM Arizona on Weekends  within
>>>>>>                         the above listed dates
>>>>>>                         (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         ·Travel TO Arizona on Weekends within the
>>>>>>                         above listed dates
>>>>>>                         (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         ·Visitation with Liz is permissible, and
>>>>>>                         up front visitation which has also been
>>>>>>                         discussed is also permissible as long as
>>>>>>                         I am apprised of G*****'s location and
>>>>>>                         the plans.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         ·The above plans as previously stated are
>>>>>>                         contingent upon you providing me a full
>>>>>>                         travel itinerary including all flight
>>>>>>                         details and arrangements for G*****
>>>>>>                         while on travel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Patrick
>>>>>>                          wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             You're the one going "round and
>>>>>>                             round".  I HAVE reviewed the previous
>>>>>>                             emails, which is why I require
>>>>>>                             clarification - first you stated one
>>>>>>                             set of requirements, then you stated
>>>>>>                             a different set of requirements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             You are grossly mistaken about the
>>>>>>                             meaning and legal definition of
>>>>>>                             "including but not limited to".  You
>>>>>>                             might want to review, for example,
>>>>>>                             some current case law on the matter.
>>>>>>                             Specifically, the "but not limited
>>>>>>                             to" means the previously stated list
>>>>>>                             of requirements is NOT exhaustive and
>>>>>>                             MAY include additional, not
>>>>>>                             explicitly stated, requirements. Stop
>>>>>>                             pretending to be smarter than you are!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             If what you wish to express is that
>>>>>>                             you require specific information then
>>>>>>                             you should have phrased it as, for
>>>>>>                             example:
>>>>>>                             "I will require x, y, z.  Additional
>>>>>>                             information may be provided, at your
>>>>>>                             discretion, but is not required by me."
>>>>>>                             Based on your most recent email THAT
>>>>>>                             is what you meant to say.  But that
>>>>>>                             is 100% contrary to what you ACTUALLY
>>>>>>                             said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             Since, literally, what you have said
>>>>>>                             in your email dated 2015-05-04 is
>>>>>>                             that G***** is permitted to travel
>>>>>>                             "between" the dates of "May 24th and
>>>>>>                             July 12th", with no additional
>>>>>>                             exclusions or qualifications, I am
>>>>>>                             going to obtain G***** a flight from
>>>>>>                             Phoenix to Vancouver for a date which
>>>>>>                             will be reasonable and cost
>>>>>>                             effective.  I don't care if that is
>>>>>>                             conducive with your work schedule
>>>>>>                             because there is no requirement that
>>>>>>                             you MUST personally transport him to
>>>>>>                             the airport or be present at the time
>>>>>>                             of his departure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             In the event you are actually
>>>>>>                             interested in better educating
>>>>>>                             yourself (since, clearly UoP hasn't
>>>>>>                             done much for you in that respect),
>>>>>>                             here are a couple links regarding
>>>>>>                             "including but not limited to":
>>>>>>                             http://www.adamsdrafting.com/including-without-
limitation/
>>>>>>                             http://www.weagree.com/book/96-The+issue+of+%E2%80
%98include%E2%80%99+and+%E2%80%98without+limitation%E2%80%99.html
>>>>>>                             http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/including-vs-
including-without-limit-48967/
>>>>>>                             http://www.americancriminallawreview.com/aclr-
online/overplaying-their-hand-overly-broad-interpretive-canons-applied-including-not-
limited-clauses/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                             On 05/05/2015 12:59 PM, Desiree
>>>>>>                             Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>                             Ricky,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             I really don't have the time or
>>>>>>>                             patience for this.  You seem to want
>>>>>>>                             to go round and round on questions
>>>>>>>                             that have already been answered. 
>>>>>>>                             You asked for a confirmation of
>>>>>>>                             dates and I gave it to you. If you
>>>>>>>                             require additional calrification,
>>>>>>>                             read the previous emails in the
>>>>>>>                             thread.  "Including but not limited
>>>>>>>                             to" means that I will accept any
>>>>>>>                             additional information you have to
>>>>>>>                             provide, but I require the stated
>>>>>>>                             pieces of information at a minimum.
>>>>>>>                             Understanding the use of this term
>>>>>>>                             is covered under basic reading
>>>>>>>                             comprehension. The only other email
>>>>>>>                             correspondence that needs to be
>>>>>>>                             provided is the travel itinerary.
>>>>>>>                             There is no need for any further
>>>>>>>                             discussion of the matter and as such
>>>>>>>                             I will not be responding to anything
>>>>>>>                             else.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             Good Day
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                             On Monday, May 4, 2015, Patrick
>>>>>>>                              wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                                 Desiree:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                                 What additional information will
>>>>>>>                                 you "need"?  Your response
>>>>>>>                                 states "...including [sic] but
>>>>>>>                                 not limited to...", which means
>>>>>>>                                 that you are reserving the right
>>>>>>>                                 to add to the stated list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                                 Also, your most recent message
>>>>>>>                                 (below) conflicts with the
>>>>>>>                                 previous message, in that you
>>>>>>>                                 are now stating G***** may
>>>>>>>                                 travel "between" the dates of
>>>>>>>                                 May 24th and July 12th, whereas
>>>>>>>                                 you previously stated he may
>>>>>>>                                 depart Phoenix only on May 23,
>>>>>>>                                 24, 30 or 31.  So that I am
>>>>>>>                                 clear: are you now saying he may
>>>>>>>                                 depart Phoenix on other dates,
>>>>>>>                                 as well?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                                 Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                                 On 05/04/2015 09:07 PM, Desiree
>>>>>>>                                 Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>                                 Yes, G***** may travel for the
>>>>>>>>                                 purposes of visitation between
>>>>>>>>                                 the dates of May 24th and July
>>>>>>>>                                 12th, 2015.  I will need the
>>>>>>>>                                 travel plans (itinerary) all
>>>>>>>>                                 flights G***** will be
>>>>>>>>                                 occupying, including but not
>>>>>>>>                                 limited to; the airline, day,
>>>>>>>>                                 time, flight
>>>>>>>>                                 number, confirmation number,
>>>>>>>>                                 and destination. This includes
>>>>>>>>                                 his flight from California to
>>>>>>>>                                 Vancouver.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                 On Monday, May 4, 2015, Patrick
>>>>>>>>                                 
>>>>>>>>                                 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                     Desiree:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                     Please provide a definitive
>>>>>>>>                                     response clearly stating
>>>>>>>>                                     whether or not you are
>>>>>>>>                                     going to allow G***** to
>>>>>>>>                                     visit between the dates of
>>>>>>>>                                     May 24, 2015 and July 12,
>>>>>>>>                                     2015.  You're silence
>>>>>>>>                                     requires the other party
>>>>>>>>                                     (me) to make assumptions,
>>>>>>>>                                     and assumptions are not
>>>>>>>>                                     admissible in court.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                     Patrick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                     On 04/26/2015 04:24 PM,
>>>>>>>>                                     Patrick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>                                     Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                     What the fuck is wrong
>>>>>>>>>                                     with your head?  Do you do
>>>>>>>>>                                     this silly shit just to be
>>>>>>>>>                                     annoying is your whole
>>>>>>>>>                                     life experience based on
>>>>>>>>>                                     trailer parks and TV? 
>>>>>>>>>                                     Come back to reality for a
>>>>>>>>>                                     second, will ya?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                     What the fuck do you mean
>>>>>>>>>                                     by "itinerary"?!?!? That
>>>>>>>>>                                     is such a fucking vague
>>>>>>>>>                                     term.  Be specific, you
>>>>>>>>>                                     fucking idiot!  You're
>>>>>>>>>                                     wasting my time with all
>>>>>>>>>                                     this stupid back and
>>>>>>>>>                                     forth.  You pretend like
>>>>>>>>>                                     you give a shit about
>>>>>>>>>                                     G*****'s safety,
>>>>>>>>>                                     demanding I provide an
>>>>>>>>>                                     "itinerary" and that I
>>>>>>>>>                                     keep on me documents to
>>>>>>>>>                                     establish I'm someone I'm
>>>>>>>>>                                     not - and the other 364
>>>>>>>>>                                     days out of the year you
>>>>>>>>>                                     don't put an ounce of
>>>>>>>>>                                     interest into what's going
>>>>>>>>>                                     on with him.  Stop being
>>>>>>>>>                                     such a fucking tool!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                     Just shut the fuck up and
>>>>>>>>>                                     be a normal person or just
>>>>>>>>>                                     fucking go away.  I don't
>>>>>>>>>                                     need your stupid shit and
>>>>>>>>>                                     I have better things to do
>>>>>>>>>                                     than try to jump through
>>>>>>>>>                                     your hoops for your
>>>>>>>>>                                     amusement. You're just a
>>>>>>>>>                                     fucking twit. There is no
>>>>>>>>>                                     documentation identifying
>>>>>>>>>                                     me as Richard and
>>>>>>>>>                                     you know it.  That
>>>>>>>>>                                     deportation document is
>>>>>>>>>                                     meaningless since the
>>>>>>>>>                                     government has admitted
>>>>>>>>>                                     that I'm not that person. 
>>>>>>>>>                                     What the FUCK is wrong
>>>>>>>>>                                     with you?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                     And don't go telling
>>>>>>>>>                                     G***** that the reason he
>>>>>>>>>                                     can't come to visit is
>>>>>>>>>                                     because I didn't meet your
>>>>>>>>>                                     "reasonable requirements".
>>>>>>>>>                                     Your requirements are
>>>>>>>>>                                     moronic and impossible to
>>>>>>>>>                                     meet because they keep
>>>>>>>>>                                     changing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                     I'm done with you.  Let
>>>>>>>>>                                     him visit or don't, it's
>>>>>>>>>                                     your problem. He and I
>>>>>>>>>                                     both know that you have
>>>>>>>>>                                     100% of the authority to
>>>>>>>>>                                     allow him to visit and
>>>>>>>>>                                     that it is entirely on you
>>>>>>>>>                                     - not me. He turns 16 in
>>>>>>>>>                                     less than a year and a
>>>>>>>>>                                     half and I'm pretty sure
>>>>>>>>>                                     when that day arrives he's
>>>>>>>>>                                     going to say "Fuck you!"
>>>>>>>>>                                     and that will be the last
>>>>>>>>>                                     you hear of him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                     Good day,
>>>>>>>>>                                     Patrick
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                     On 04/26/2015 04:02 PM,
>>>>>>>>>                                     Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>                                     Ricky,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                     That sounds like an
>>>>>>>>>>                                     acceptable start to me.
>>>>>>>>>>                                     However, as already
>>>>>>>>>>                                     discussed, I will require
>>>>>>>>>>                                     a full itinerary for
>>>>>>>>>>                                     G*****'s summer trip.
>>>>>>>>>>                                     Upon my receipt of said
>>>>>>>>>>                                     itinerary, I will review
>>>>>>>>>>                                     it in full and provide
>>>>>>>>>>                                     approval at such time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                     Also, please remember to
>>>>>>>>>>                                     keep a copy of your
>>>>>>>>>>                                     deportation paperwork
>>>>>>>>>>                                     handy as you claim that
>>>>>>>>>>                                     is the only legal
>>>>>>>>>>                                     document in your
>>>>>>>>>>                                     possession identifying
>>>>>>>>>>                                     you as Richard 
>>>>>>>>>>                                     (G*****'s father).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                     ~Desiree
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                     On Sunday, April 26,
>>>>>>>>>>                                     2015, Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>                                      wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                         I have confirmed,
>>>>>>>>>>                                         with Liz, that she
>>>>>>>>>>                                         would pick up G*****
>>>>>>>>>>                                         from LAX on May 24,
>>>>>>>>>>                                         2015 and she would
>>>>>>>>>>                                         bring him to LAX on
>>>>>>>>>>                                         May 27, 2015 or May
>>>>>>>>>>                                         28, 2015 to travel to
>>>>>>>>>>                                         Vancouver, BC. 
>>>>>>>>>>                                         During the time
>>>>>>>>>>                                         G***** would be in
>>>>>>>>>>                                         Los Angeles, he would
>>>>>>>>>>                                         be staying at Liz's
>>>>>>>>>>                                         residence.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                         Is that acceptable to
>>>>>>>>>>                                         you?  And, if so, do
>>>>>>>>>>                                         you agree to permit
>>>>>>>>>>                                         G***** to travel
>>>>>>>>>>                                         from Phoenix, AZ to
>>>>>>>>>>                                         Los Angeles, CA on
>>>>>>>>>>                                         May 24, 2015, then
>>>>>>>>>>                                         from Los Angeles, CA
>>>>>>>>>>                                         to Vancouver, BC on
>>>>>>>>>>                                         May 28, 2015?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                         Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                         On 04/26/2015 11:35
>>>>>>>>>>                                         AM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         I'm unclear - your
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         "previous
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         correspondence"
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         stated that G*****
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         traveling to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         California was
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         contingent on your
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         express notice and
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         consent.  But you
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         now seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         saying that it is
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         pre-authorized by
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         you and that you
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         just require "full
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         itinerary including
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         flight and contact
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         information". May
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         you please try to be
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         a little more clear
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         and consistent in
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         your communication?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         I will speak with
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         the relevant parties
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         in Los Angeles and
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         get back to you with
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         confirmations.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         Responses to your
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         statements:
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         1. You are correct
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         that you are not
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         required, not
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         legally anyway, to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         justify your
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         decisions to me. 
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         However, your
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         refusal to provide a
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         rationale for your
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         decisions is
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         evidence that such
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         decisions are
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         arbitrary and NOT
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         based on rationale
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         or on what is in
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         G*****'s best
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         interests. And child
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         rearing (or leading,
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         in general)
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         arbitrarily, as
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         opposed to by
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         rational
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         consideration and
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         democratic processes
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         is fascist and
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         dictatorial. I have
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         been, and I believe
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         I have now, proven
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         that that is your
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         approach to raising
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         children (if not
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         your approach to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         life, in general).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         In the past, when I
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         have attempted to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         implement a rule, I
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         have always allowed
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         G***** the
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         opportunity to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         question it's
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         rationale and, on
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         more than one
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         occasion he has
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         pointed out that
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         there was no logical
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         basis for it. In
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         such cases I have
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         conceded that he was
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         correct and the rule
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         was either abandoned
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         or modified
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         appropriately. THAT
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         is my approach to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         raising children -
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         and to life in
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         general.  That is
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         why I am a better
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         person than you and
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         why G***** will
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         always respect me,
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         while he fears you.
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         Personally, I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         rather have
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         someone's earned
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         respect than to have
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         their fear. But
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         that's just me.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         2. I am not "failing
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         to comply", as you
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         put it.  I am
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         proposing
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         alternatives to what
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         you have mandated,
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         in order to make
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         more cost effective
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         travel arrangements.
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         Alternatives which
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         would not affect you
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         in any way
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         whatsoever because
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         you are not the one
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         traveling. You are
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         proving that you are
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         completely unwilling
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         to have ANY
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         flexibility in this
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         matter - even though
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         it does not affect
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         you in any way at
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         all.  Is there ANY
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         reason you can
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         provide why G*****
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         should not be
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         permitted to travel
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         on May 28, 2015
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         rather than on May
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         24, 2015? You're
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         adamant refusal to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         provide such
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         indicates there is not.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         As for me being the
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         one hurting G*****,
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         I don't see how you
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         come to that
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         conclusion. You're
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         the one being
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         completely
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         inflexible on his
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         travel dates and
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         only allowing him to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         travel on the dates
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         that the flights
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         cost over $500.  How
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         exactly am I the one
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         hurting him?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         I include G***** in
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         correspondence
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         because I believe in
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         being transparent
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         and honest with him.
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         You're approach is
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         to say one thing to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         me (or to the
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         court), then to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         provide G***** your
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         fairy tale
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         perception of the
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         situation - wherein
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         you usually portray
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         yourself as the
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         noble, honorable,
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         victim.  But the way
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         you portray things
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         to G***** only
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         works if I'm never
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         able to rebut your
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         stories - if I never
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         hear about what
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         you've told him.  Do
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         you honestly believe
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         that G***** and I
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         keep secrets from
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         each other?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         Either list,
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         specifically, what
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         "inflammatory and
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         defamatory lies"
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         you're referring to,
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         or stop making such
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         vague
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         generalizations. You
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         see how I am
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         specific when make
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         claims about you? 
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         That's why everyone
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         believes me, and
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         ignores you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         3. What childish
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         tantrums?  How am I
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         being childish?  And
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         what behavior
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         qualifies as a tantrum?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         4. The purpose of
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         this communication
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         was directly and
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         exclusively related
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         to G*****'s
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         visitation. You are
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         the one that started
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         being belligerent.
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         Why do you keep
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         doing that?  What is
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         wrong with you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         5.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         On 04/26/2015 11:02
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         AM, Desiree Capuano
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                         Ricky Steve
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                         (so you aren't
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                         confused),
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                         That is acceptable
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                         per my previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                         correspondence.
>>>>>>>>>>