Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: G***** summer visitation 2015
From: Patrick <>
To: Desiree Capuano <>
Date: Wed, May 06 2015 3:46:18 pm

Last night I sent you an email requesting what you will permit with 
respect to layover duration, et cetera.  Why, when I request 
clarification of anything from you, do you always refuse to provide it?  
You refuse to be clear - even when the other party explicitly requests 
clarification - and then later you try to accuse the other party of 
"misinterpreting" what you meant.  Maybe if you used the English 
language correctly clarification would not be necessary.


On 05/06/2015 02:23 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
> Once again - I don't see a travel itinerary.  Do you want to keep 
> talking or do you want to see your son?  Are you seriously suggesting 
> you would book G***** on a 15 hour flight?
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Patrick  > wrote:
>     Desiree:
>     That's wonderful.  You have never indicated that you would allow a
>     flight which has connectors and based on your demonstrated refusal
>     to allow your children any independence, one must assume that you
>     would not be amenable to such flights.  I have, repeatedly, asked
>     you whether such travel arrangements would be permissible and you
>     have refused to respond.
>     Are you saying that you're okay with a 15 hour flight, including a
>     10 hour layover in a distant city?  You may notice, the lowest
>     priced direct flight is $965US, which is about $1200CDN.  You
>     realize I would be paying in Canadian dollars, right?
>     Why do you insist on blaming your fuck-ups and shortcomings on me?
>     Patrick
>     On 05/06/2015 02:10 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>     In case you have trouble navigating the link, I took the liberty
>>     of taking screenshots for you (there are 11 pages of flights to
>>     choose from);
>>     Inline image 1
>>     On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Desiree Capuano
>>     >     > wrote:
>>         I would appreciate it if you would keep your emotions in
>>         check as we attempt to discuss and resolve this.
>>         Did I ever once say I needed to know where G***** was going
>>         to be every single minute of every single day?  No, I
>>         haven't.  I told you specifically what information I needed,
>>         which was regarding the plane/flight information ONLY but you
>>         wanted to argue about the meaning of "including but not
>>         limited to".
>>         You never once asked me to work with you on the date of his
>>         departure, you demanded it and only AFTER I said 'No' did you
>>         bring up that it was about the cost.
>>          With all your threats to "destroy me", the emails you've
>>         sent to my work, and that horrendous website still up
>>         and being hosted from your home computer - what makes you
>>         think that I should do ANYTHING to help you out?  Tell me
>>         exactly why I am responsible for taking time off of work to
>>         accommodate you? Where exactly does it say that I am required
>>         to in the court decree?  Please show me.
>>         See - you still don't get it.  If you had come to me and said
>>         "hey, flights are cheaper on Wednesday and I would really
>>         appreciate it if you would work with me on G*****'s travel"
>>         I would have done it.  Even after everything you have done
>>         (especially beginning in March).  The fight here is one
>>         sided, always has been.
>>         Now to wrap this up, I do NOT need (from you or Liz);
>>         /1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially a list of
>>         places to visit; plan of travel. /
>>         /
>>         2. a line of travel; route./
>>         /
>>         /
>>         /3. an account of a journey; record of travel./
>>         /
>>         4. a book describing a route or routes of travel with
>>         information helpful to travelers; guidebook for travelers./
>>         What I need is the same thing you have sent me for every
>>         other visitation G***** has had to see you - the
>>         confirmation from the airline that includes the flight
>>         information (generally referred to as a "travel itinerary" -
>>         I can copy and paste a picture of one of you still need it
>>         for reference).
>>          I just did a search on Google and found the following;
>>         I gave you the travel dates on April 20th.  You could have
>>         purchase a ticket at any point in the last 2 weeks.  Instead
>>         you want to quibble over dictionary definitions and cite case
>>         law and now there are no reasonable flights left that are
>>         non-stop.  So I guess I have no choice but to allow a
>>         layover, unless you want to explain to Liz that you were
>>         incorrect in your interpretation of what I said. Regardless
>>         of where he's traveling to, send me the flight confirmation. 
>>         Or don't and we can most certainly take this back to court
>>         and you can plead your case.
>>         Cheerio
>>         On Tuesday, May 5, 2015, Patrick
>>         >         >
>>         wrote:
>>             Desiree:
>>             How am I the one making it complicated when you're the
>>             one changing your demands?  Please see my further
>>             comments below.
>>             On 05/05/2015 08:55 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>             Ricky,
>>>             This is just unnecessarily complicated.  Even for you. 
>>>             Let me make this VERY simple so that you can follow.
>>>             1.As stated on the email 05/04/2015 which you cited,
>>>             Gariel's permissible time period for visitation with you
>>>             is between May 24th, 2015 and July 12th, 2015.  This
>>>             means that the EARLIEST he may leave Arizona is May
>>>             24th, and the LATEST that G***** may be returned to my
>>>             custody is July 12th, 2015.
>>>             2.As stated previously as well, G***** is to depart
>>>             Arizona on a weekend, and be returned on a weekend
>>>             within the above stated time period of visitation.  NOT
>>>             a week day. G***** and I have both looked up the prices
>>>             for tickets, and there is not a significant price
>>>             difference between equivalent weekend and week day
>>>             flights as you (falsely) stated previously.  This is not
>>>             a significant financial hardship.
>>             In your email dated 2015-05-04 you stated, and I'm
>>             quoting, "G***** *may travel* for the purposes
>>             of visitation *between the dates of* May 24th and July
>>             12th, 2015" (emphasis added).  You stated, in your own
>>             words, in writing, that G***** may travel between the
>>             two stated dates and you did not further qualify it.
>>             You still have not provided a reason as to WHY you will
>>             not permit G***** to travel on a weekday.  Contrary to
>>             your grossly misinformed belief, you ARE required to
>>             provide a reason under these circumstances.  You need to
>>             find yourself a better legal advisor.
>>             You are full of shit about the cost of the flights.  A
>>             flight on May 27, 28 is $150 - $180; on May 24 it's
>>             $1300, on May 30, 31 it $550 and up.  How is that not a
>>             significant difference?  If you're going to make such
>>             claims then provide proof. Where did you find such ticket
>>             prices?
>>>             3.You and I have already discussed a situation where by
>>>             you have an option for G***** to fly to LA to visit
>>>             with Liz on a weekend, then fly to visit you in Canada
>>>             during a week day.
>>             You have imposed unreasonable requirements on allowing
>>             G***** to fly to LA.  You insist that you require a
>>             complete itinerary but then you refuse to clarify exactly
>>             what information you are demanding.  That is the same
>>             stupid single mother bullshit my mother did when I was a
>>             kid and I'm not going to waste my time on it.
>>>             4.The above visitation as previously stated ALSO is
>>>             contingent upon a full travel itinerary including all
>>>             flight and travel plans.  You've done this before, so it
>>>             shouldn't be difficult or a surprise.
>>             Go look up the word "itinerary", you fucking moron!  What
>>             fucking language do you speak?  Is it some made up
>>             version of English?  Is it because your American that
>>             you're such an idiot?  Let me help you (from
>>    ):
>>                 itinerary
>>                 noun, plural itineraries.
>>                 1. a detailed plan for a journey, especially a list
>>                 of places to visit; plan of travel.
>>                 2. a line of travel; route.
>>                 3. an account of a journey; record of travel.
>>                 4. a book describing a route or routes of travel with
>>                 information helpful to travelers; guidebook for
>>                 travelers.
>>             So what the fuck are you asking for?  Just the flight
>>             information?  Do you want to know exactly where he is
>>             going to be each day?  Be more fucking specific you
>>             fucking idiot!
>>             Fuck you, and fuck your stupid, white trash, single
>>             mother bullshit games.  I'm going to get him a ticket for
>>             the 27th or 28th and if you don't allow him to leave then
>>             I get to show the court that not once, but twice now
>>             you've refused to allow him to visit during his extended
>>             school breaks.
>>             Good day, I'm not reading any further because your
>>             stupidity hurts my head.
>>             Patrick
>>>             *_Recap_*:
>>>             ·Travel between 05/24/2015-07/12/2015.
>>>             ·Travel FROM Arizona on Weekends  within the above
>>>             listed dates (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>             ·Travel TO Arizona on Weekends within the above listed
>>>             dates (05/24/2015-07/12/2015) only.
>>>             ·Visitation with Liz is permissible, and up front
>>>             visitation which has also been discussed is also
>>>             permissible as long as I am apprised of G*****'s
>>>             location and the plans.
>>>             ·The above plans as previously stated are contingent
>>>             upon you providing me a full travel itinerary including
>>>             all flight details and arrangements for G***** while on
>>>             travel.
>>>             On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Patrick
>>>              wrote:
>>>                 You're the one going "round and round".  I HAVE
>>>                 reviewed the previous emails, which is why I require
>>>                 clarification - first you stated one set of
>>>                 requirements, then you stated a different set of
>>>                 requirements.
>>>                 You are grossly mistaken about the meaning and legal
>>>                 definition of "including but not limited to".  You
>>>                 might want to review, for example, some current case
>>>                 law on the matter.  Specifically, the "but not
>>>                 limited to" means the previously stated list of
>>>                 requirements is NOT exhaustive and MAY include
>>>                 additional, not explicitly stated, requirements. 
>>>                 Stop pretending to be smarter than you are!
>>>                 If what you wish to express is that you require
>>>                 specific information then you should have phrased it
>>>                 as, for example:
>>>                 "I will require x, y, z. Additional information may
>>>                 be provided, at your discretion, but is not required
>>>                 by me."
>>>                 Based on your most recent email THAT is what you
>>>                 meant to say.  But that is 100% contrary to what you
>>>                 ACTUALLY said.
>>>                 Since, literally, what you have said in your email
>>>                 dated 2015-05-04 is that G***** is permitted to
>>>                 travel "between" the dates of "May 24th and July
>>>                 12th", with no additional exclusions or
>>>                 qualifications, I am going to obtain G***** a
>>>                 flight from Phoenix to Vancouver for a date which
>>>                 will be reasonable and cost effective.  I don't care
>>>                 if that is conducive with your work schedule because
>>>                 there is no requirement that you MUST personally
>>>                 transport him to the airport or be present at the
>>>                 time of his departure.
>>>                 In the event you are actually interested in better
>>>                 educating yourself (since, clearly UoP hasn't done
>>>                 much for you in that respect), here are a couple
>>>                 links regarding "including but not limited to":
>>>                 Patrick
>>>                 On 05/05/2015 12:59 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>                 Ricky,
>>>>                 I really don't have the time or patience for this. 
>>>>                 You seem to want to go round and round on questions
>>>>                 that have already been answered.  You asked for a
>>>>                 confirmation of dates and I gave it to you. If you
>>>>                 require additional calrification, read the previous
>>>>                 emails in the thread.  "Including but not limited
>>>>                 to" means that I will accept any additional
>>>>                 information you have to provide, but I require the
>>>>                 stated pieces of information at a minimum.
>>>>                 Understanding the use of this term is covered under
>>>>                 basic reading comprehension.  The only other email
>>>>                 correspondence that needs to be provided is the
>>>>                 travel itinerary.  There is no need for any further
>>>>                 discussion of the matter and as such I will not be
>>>>                 responding to anything else.
>>>>                 Good Day
>>>>                 On Monday, May 4, 2015, Patrick
>>>>                  wrote:
>>>>                     Desiree:
>>>>                     What additional information will you "need"? 
>>>>                     Your response states "...including [sic] but
>>>>                     not limited to...", which means that you are
>>>>                     reserving the right to add to the stated list.
>>>>                     Also, your most recent message (below)
>>>>                     conflicts with the previous message, in that
>>>>                     you are now stating G***** may travel
>>>>                     "between" the dates of May 24th and July 12th,
>>>>                     whereas you previously stated he may depart
>>>>                     Phoenix only on May 23, 24, 30 or 31.  So that
>>>>                     I am clear: are you now saying he may depart
>>>>                     Phoenix on other dates, as well?
>>>>                     Patrick
>>>>                     On 05/04/2015 09:07 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>                     Yes, G***** may travel for the purposes
>>>>>                     of visitation between the dates of May 24th
>>>>>                     and July 12th, 2015.  I will need the travel
>>>>>                     plans (itinerary) all flights G***** will be
>>>>>                     occupying, including but not limited to;
>>>>>                     the airline, day, time, flight
>>>>>                     number, confirmation number, and destination.
>>>>>                     This includes his flight from California to
>>>>>                     Vancouver.
>>>>>                     On Monday, May 4, 2015, Patrick
>>>>>                      wrote:
>>>>>                         Desiree:
>>>>>                         Please provide a definitive response
>>>>>                         clearly stating whether or not you are
>>>>>                         going to allow G***** to visit between
>>>>>                         the dates of May 24, 2015 and July 12,
>>>>>                         2015.  You're silence requires the other
>>>>>                         party (me) to make assumptions, and
>>>>>                         assumptions are not admissible in court.
>>>>>                         Patrick
>>>>>                         On 04/26/2015 04:24 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>>>                         Desiree:
>>>>>>                         What the fuck is wrong with your head? 
>>>>>>                         Do you do this silly shit just to be
>>>>>>                         annoying is your whole life experience
>>>>>>                         based on trailer parks and TV?  Come back
>>>>>>                         to reality for a second, will ya?
>>>>>>                         What the fuck do you mean by
>>>>>>                         "itinerary"?!?!? That is such a fucking
>>>>>>                         vague term.  Be specific, you fucking
>>>>>>                         idiot!  You're wasting my time with all
>>>>>>                         this stupid back and forth.  You pretend
>>>>>>                         like you give a shit about G*****'s
>>>>>>                         safety, demanding I provide an
>>>>>>                         "itinerary" and that I keep on me
>>>>>>                         documents to establish I'm someone I'm
>>>>>>                         not - and the other 364 days out of the
>>>>>>                         year you don't put an ounce of interest
>>>>>>                         into what's going on with him.  Stop
>>>>>>                         being such a fucking tool!
>>>>>>                         Just shut the fuck up and be a normal
>>>>>>                         person or just fucking go away.  I don't
>>>>>>                         need your stupid shit and I have better
>>>>>>                         things to do than try to jump through
>>>>>>                         your hoops for your amusement. You're
>>>>>>                         just a fucking twit. There is no
>>>>>>                         documentation identifying me as Richard 
>>>>>>                         and you know it.  That deportation
>>>>>>                         document is meaningless since the
>>>>>>                         government has admitted that I'm not that
>>>>>>                         person.  What the FUCK is wrong with you?
>>>>>>                         And don't go telling G***** that the
>>>>>>                         reason he can't come to visit is because
>>>>>>                         I didn't meet your "reasonable
>>>>>>                         requirements". Your requirements are
>>>>>>                         moronic and impossible to meet because
>>>>>>                         they keep changing.
>>>>>>                         I'm done with you.  Let him visit or
>>>>>>                         don't, it's your problem. He and I both
>>>>>>                         know that you have 100% of the authority
>>>>>>                         to allow him to visit and that it is
>>>>>>                         entirely on you - not me. He turns 16 in
>>>>>>                         less than a year and a half and I'm
>>>>>>                         pretty sure when that day arrives he's
>>>>>>                         going to say "Fuck you!" and that will be
>>>>>>                         the last you hear of him.
>>>>>>                         Good day,
>>>>>>                         Patrick
>>>>>>                         On 04/26/2015 04:02 PM, Desiree Capuano
>>>>>>                         wrote:
>>>>>>>                         Ricky,
>>>>>>>                         That sounds like an acceptable start to
>>>>>>>                         me. However, as already discussed, I
>>>>>>>                         will require a full itinerary for
>>>>>>>                         G*****'s summer trip. Upon my receipt
>>>>>>>                         of said itinerary, I will review it in
>>>>>>>                         full and provide approval at such time.
>>>>>>>                         Also, please remember to keep a copy of
>>>>>>>                         your deportation paperwork handy as you
>>>>>>>                         claim that is the only legal document in
>>>>>>>                         your possession identifying you as
>>>>>>>                         Richard (G*****'s father).
>>>>>>>                         ~Desiree
>>>>>>>                         On Sunday, April 26, 2015, Patrick
>>>>>>>                          wrote:
>>>>>>>                             I have confirmed, with Liz, that she
>>>>>>>                             would pick up G***** from LAX on
>>>>>>>                             May 24, 2015 and she would bring him
>>>>>>>                             to LAX on May 27, 2015 or May 28,
>>>>>>>                             2015 to travel to Vancouver, BC. 
>>>>>>>                             During the time G***** would be in
>>>>>>>                             Los Angeles, he would be staying at
>>>>>>>                             Liz's residence.
>>>>>>>                             Is that acceptable to you?  And, if
>>>>>>>                             so, do you agree to permit G*****
>>>>>>>                             to travel from Phoenix, AZ to Los
>>>>>>>                             Angeles, CA on May 24, 2015, then
>>>>>>>                             from Los Angeles, CA to Vancouver,
>>>>>>>                             BC on May 28, 2015?
>>>>>>>                             Patrick
>>>>>>>                             On 04/26/2015 11:35 AM, Patrick
>>>>>>>                             wrote:
>>>>>>>>                             Desiree:
>>>>>>>>                             I'm unclear - your "previous
>>>>>>>>                             correspondence" stated that G*****
>>>>>>>>                             traveling to California was
>>>>>>>>                             contingent on your express notice
>>>>>>>>                             and consent.  But you now seem to
>>>>>>>>                             be saying that it is pre-authorized
>>>>>>>>                             by you and that you just require
>>>>>>>>                             "full itinerary including flight
>>>>>>>>                             and contact information". May you
>>>>>>>>                             please try to be a little more
>>>>>>>>                             clear and consistent in your
>>>>>>>>                             communication?
>>>>>>>>                             I will speak with the relevant
>>>>>>>>                             parties in Los Angeles and get back
>>>>>>>>                             to you with confirmations.
>>>>>>>>                             Responses to your statements:
>>>>>>>>                             1. You are correct that you are not
>>>>>>>>                             required, not legally anyway, to
>>>>>>>>                             justify your decisions to me. 
>>>>>>>>                             However, your refusal to provide a
>>>>>>>>                             rationale for your decisions is
>>>>>>>>                             evidence that such decisions are
>>>>>>>>                             arbitrary and NOT based on
>>>>>>>>                             rationale or on what is in
>>>>>>>>                             G*****'s best interests. And child
>>>>>>>>                             rearing (or leading, in general)
>>>>>>>>                             arbitrarily, as opposed to by
>>>>>>>>                             rational consideration and
>>>>>>>>                             democratic processes is fascist and
>>>>>>>>                             dictatorial. I have been, and I
>>>>>>>>                             believe I have now, proven that
>>>>>>>>                             that is your approach to raising
>>>>>>>>                             children (if not your approach to
>>>>>>>>                             life, in general).
>>>>>>>>                             In the past, when I have attempted
>>>>>>>>                             to implement a rule, I have always
>>>>>>>>                             allowed G***** the opportunity to
>>>>>>>>                             question it's rationale and, on
>>>>>>>>                             more than one occasion he has
>>>>>>>>                             pointed out that there was no
>>>>>>>>                             logical basis for it. In such cases
>>>>>>>>                             I have conceded that he was correct
>>>>>>>>                             and the rule was either abandoned
>>>>>>>>                             or modified appropriately. THAT is
>>>>>>>>                             my approach to raising children -
>>>>>>>>                             and to life in general.  That is
>>>>>>>>                             why I am a better person than you
>>>>>>>>                             and why G***** will always respect
>>>>>>>>                             me, while he fears you. Personally,
>>>>>>>>                             I'd rather have someone's earned
>>>>>>>>                             respect than to have their fear.
>>>>>>>>                             But that's just me.
>>>>>>>>                             2. I am not "failing to comply", as
>>>>>>>>                             you put it.  I am proposing
>>>>>>>>                             alternatives to what you have
>>>>>>>>                             mandated, in order to make more
>>>>>>>>                             cost effective travel arrangements.
>>>>>>>>                             Alternatives which would not affect
>>>>>>>>                             you in any way whatsoever because
>>>>>>>>                             you are not the one traveling. You
>>>>>>>>                             are proving that you are completely
>>>>>>>>                             unwilling to have ANY flexibility
>>>>>>>>                             in this matter - even though it
>>>>>>>>                             does not affect you in any way at
>>>>>>>>                             all.  Is there ANY reason you can
>>>>>>>>                             provide why G***** should not be
>>>>>>>>                             permitted to travel on May 28, 2015
>>>>>>>>                             rather than on May 24, 2015? You're
>>>>>>>>                             adamant refusal to provide such
>>>>>>>>                             indicates there is not.
>>>>>>>>                             As for me being the one hurting
>>>>>>>>                             G*****, I don't see how you come
>>>>>>>>                             to that conclusion. You're the one
>>>>>>>>                             being completely inflexible on his
>>>>>>>>                             travel dates and only allowing him
>>>>>>>>                             to travel on the dates that the
>>>>>>>>                             flights cost over $500.  How
>>>>>>>>                             exactly am I the one hurting him?
>>>>>>>>                             I include G***** in correspondence
>>>>>>>>                             because I believe in being
>>>>>>>>                             transparent and honest with him.
>>>>>>>>                             You're approach is to say one thing
>>>>>>>>                             to me (or to the court), then to
>>>>>>>>                             provide G***** your fairy tale
>>>>>>>>                             perception of the situation -
>>>>>>>>                             wherein you usually portray
>>>>>>>>                             yourself as the noble, honorable,
>>>>>>>>                             victim.  But the way you portray
>>>>>>>>                             things to G***** only works if I'm
>>>>>>>>                             never able to rebut your stories -
>>>>>>>>                             if I never hear about what you've
>>>>>>>>                             told him.  Do you honestly believe
>>>>>>>>                             that G***** and I keep secrets
>>>>>>>>                             from each other?
>>>>>>>>                             Either list, specifically, what
>>>>>>>>                             "inflammatory and defamatory lies"
>>>>>>>>                             you're referring to, or stop making
>>>>>>>>                             such vague generalizations. You see
>>>>>>>>                             how I am specific when make claims
>>>>>>>>                             about you?  That's why everyone
>>>>>>>>                             believes me, and ignores you.
>>>>>>>>                             3. What childish tantrums?  How am
>>>>>>>>                             I being childish?  And what
>>>>>>>>                             behavior qualifies as a tantrum?
>>>>>>>>                             4. The purpose of this
>>>>>>>>                             communication was directly and
>>>>>>>>                             exclusively related to G*****'s
>>>>>>>>                             visitation. You are the one that
>>>>>>>>                             started being belligerent. Why do
>>>>>>>>                             you keep doing that?  What is wrong
>>>>>>>>                             with you?
>>>>>>>>                             5.
>>>>>>>>                             On 04/26/2015 11:02 AM, Desiree
>>>>>>>>                             Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>                             Ricky Steve (so you aren't
>>>>>>>>>                             confused),
>>>>>>>>>                             That is acceptable per my previous
>>>>>>>>>                             correspondence. As a side note, I
>>>>>>>>>                             am not required to justify my
>>>>>>>>>                             decisions to you for any reason at
>>>>>>>>>                             any point.  I have told you the
>>>>>>>>>                             terms.  You may comply or not. 
>>>>>>>>>                             That is your decision. Your
>>>>>>>>>                             failure to comply in this instance
>>>>>>>>>                             only hurts G*****.  As does your
>>>>>>>>>                             continuing to include G***** on
>>>>>>>>>                             correspondence where you make
>>>>>>>>>                             unfounded inflammatory,
>>>>>>>>>                             and defamatory lies despite both
>>>>>>>>>                             he and I requesting that you do
>>>>>>>>>                             not do so.
>>>>>>>>>                             Again, cease and desist in your
>>>>>>>>>                             childish tantrums and obsessive
>>>>>>>>>                             stalking behavior. There is no
>>>>>>>>>                             reason(or desire) for us to
>>>>>>>>>                             interact  directly other than
>>>>>>>>>                             where it concerns G*****'s
>>>>>>>>>                             travel.  On that note, I await
>>>>>>>>>                             G*****'s full itinerary per
>>>>>>>>>                             previous stipulation. That means
>>>>>>>>>                             his travel to California as well
>>>>>>>>>                             as Vancouver.
>>>>>>>>>                             - Desiree
>>>>>>>>>                             On Sunday, April 26, 2015, Patrick
>>>>>>>>>                              wrote:
>>>>>>>>>                                 Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>                                 May G***** be permitted to
>>>>>>>>>                                 fly from Phoenix, AZ to Los
>>>>>>>>>                                 Angeles, CA on May 24, 2015,
>>>>>>>>>                                 then to Vancouver, BC on May
>>>>>>>>>                                 28, 2015?  If not, then please
>>>>>>>>>                                 provide your reasoning as to
>>>>>>>>>                                 why not.
>>>>>>>>>                                 Patrick
>>>>>>>>>                                 On 04/26/2015 09:17 AM,
>>>>>>>>>                                 Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>                                 Richard,
>>>>>>>>>>                                 May 27th, 2015 will not
>>>>>>>>>>                                 work.  G***** may travel on
>>>>>>>>>>                                 05/23/15 or 05/24/15.  If not
>>>>>>>>>>                                 either of those days, the
>>>>>>>>>>                                 next permissible time is the
>>>>>>>>>>                                 following weekend. Those
>>>>>>>>>>                                 dates being 05/30/15 or
>>>>>>>>>>                                 05/31/15. You will need to
>>>>>>>>>>                                 find a weekend that works for
>>>>>>>>>>                                 G***** to travel out. Keep
>>>>>>>>>>                                 in mind that his return date
>>>>>>>>>>                                 to Arizona is still to be
>>>>>>>>>>                                 July 12th, 2015 regardless of
>>>>>>>>>>                                 the date he leaves to visit. 
>>>>>>>>>>                                 That means the further you
>>>>>>>>>>                                 push out the date, the less
>>>>>>>>>>                                 time you two get together.
>>>>>>>>>>                                 On Saturday, April 25, 2015,
>>>>>>>>>>                                 Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>                                  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>                                     Desiree:
>>>>>>>>>>                                     May you confirm whether
>>>>>>>>>>                                     May 24, 2015 is the only
>>>>>>>>>>                                     date you will permit
>>>>>>>>>>                                     G***** to travel from
>>>>>>>>>>                                     Phoenix, AZ to Vancouver,
>>>>>>>>>>                                     BC?  I would like him to
>>>>>>>>>>                                     travel on May 27, 2015.
>>>>>>>>>>                                     Will he be permitted to
>>>>>>>>>>                                     do so?
>>>>>>>>>>                                     Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>                                     On 04/20/2015 10:32 AM,
>>>>>>>>>>                                     Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     Richard,
>>>>>>>>>>>                                       G***** has stated
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     that for his summer
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     vacation, he would like
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     to visit with you in
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     Canada from May 24th to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     July 12th. May you
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     please confirm that you
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     will pick G***** up
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     from the airport on May
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     24th, and return him to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     the airport on July
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     12th? During this time
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     he is to remain in the
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     care of his father
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     Richard Steve Riess in
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     Canada, and is not
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     permitted to be flown to
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     other sites such as
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     California without my
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     notification and express
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     written consent.  To
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     that end, G***** has
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     also expressed a desire
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     to travel to California
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     during this time, for
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     which I will need a full
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     itinerary including
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     flight and contact
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     information. Please
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     provide this information
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     as soon as possible so
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     that there is no delay
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     in his summer visitation.
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     Any deviation from the
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     above stated shall be
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     deemed kidnapping and a
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     violation of the terms
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     of reasonable visitation.
>>>>>>>>>>>                                     Desiree