Let me also, clarify my position on what you call me: The fact that I
accept your email which is addressed to my email account
(email@example.com), but contains the greeting addressed to Ricky
Steve is in no way an acknowledgment that my name is Ricky Steve
(or any variation thereof).
I understand that you are just playing your usual, obtuse games and you
intend for it to be an insult. Though, I fail to see how or why I
should be insulted. I remember my father did the same thing about my
mother - he refused to call her by her maiden name after they had
divorced, because he said she had never actually changed her name back.
It made him feel so smug to do that. If only he realized that to
everyone else it just made him look like an ass.
The only thing that concerns me with respect to you and my name is that
I don't want my REAL name (Patrick) to be on any of our legal
matters because that creates a publicly accessible (via the Internet)
association between you and I; and I don't want the decent (non-trashy)
people I know now to ever find out I was married to a white trash,
pothead, with tattoos and multiple children from multiple men, who
attended and actually graduated from the University of Phoenix (and even
worse, who is actually proud of graduating from the University of
Phoenix). But, as long as you continue to insist that my name is Ricky
then I guess I don't need to worry about that.
On 04/26/2015 11:02 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
> Ricky Steve (so you aren't confused),
> That is acceptable per my previous correspondence. As a side note, I
> am not required to justify my decisions to you for any reason at any
> point. I have told you the terms. You may comply or not. That is
> your decision. Your failure to comply in this instance only hurts
> G*****. As does your continuing to include G***** on correspondence
> where you make unfounded inflammatory, and defamatory lies despite
> both he and I requesting that you do not do so.
> Again, cease and desist in your childish tantrums and obsessive
> stalking behavior. There is no reason(or desire) for us to interact
> directly other than where it concerns G*****'s travel. On that
> note, I await G*****'s full itinerary per previous stipulation. That
> means his travel to California as well as Vancouver.
> - Desiree
> On Sunday, April 26, 2015, Patrick > wrote:
> May G***** be permitted to fly from Phoenix, AZ to Los Angeles,
> CA on May 24, 2015, then to Vancouver, BC on May 28, 2015? If
> not, then please provide your reasoning as to why not.
> On 04/26/2015 09:17 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>> May 27th, 2015 will not work. G***** may travel on 05/23/15 or
>> 05/24/15. If not either of those days, the next permissible time
>> is the following weekend. Those dates being 05/30/15 or
>> 05/31/15. You will need to find a weekend that works for G*****
>> to travel out. Keep in mind that his return date to Arizona is
>> still to be July 12th, 2015 regardless of the date he leaves to
>> visit. That means the further you push out the date, the less
>> time you two get together.
>> On Saturday, April 25, 2015, Patrick
>> > <_e>> wrote:
>> May you confirm whether May 24, 2015 is the only date you
>> will permit G***** to travel from Phoenix, AZ to Vancouver,
>> BC? I would like him to travel on May 27, 2015. Will he be
>> permitted to do so?
>> On 04/20/2015 10:32 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>> G***** has stated that for his summer vacation, he would
>>> like to visit with you in Canada from May 24th to July
>>> 12th. May you please confirm that you will pick G***** up
>>> from the airport on May 24th, and return him to the airport
>>> on July 12th? During this time he is to remain in the care
>>> of his father Richard Steve Riess in Canada, and is not
>>> permitted to be flown to other sites such as California
>>> without my notification and express written consent. To
>>> that end, G***** has also expressed a desire to travel to
>>> California during this time, for which I will need a full
>>> itinerary including flight and contact information. Please
>>> provide this information as soon as possible so that there
>>> is no delay in his summer visitation.
>>> Any deviation from the above stated shall be deemed
>>> kidnapping and a violation of the terms of reasonable