Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: Mail
From: Patrick <>
To: Desiree Capuano <>
Date: Thu, Apr 09 2015 7:38:27 pm
I would like to entertain, for a moment, a theory you alluded to in your 
message - that I may have "lawfully and legally changed [my] name".

If that were the case, it would bring up one puzzling question: So? 
Either way, it would mean that my legal name, at this moment, is Patrick. 
I'm not certain what relevance my legal name 2, 10, or 15 years 
ago would have to you.  And, either way, it doesn't change the fact that 
I have a birth certificate with a name that matches my legal name, and 
my date of birth.  Are you suggesting that I changed my name to another 
person's who happened to have the same date of birth as me?  Isn't that 
exactly what I admitted to doing back in 1993, at our family court 
hearing in December 2011?  Are you suggesting that many years ago, while 
living in the US, I assumed the identity of a Canadian then lived in the 
US as an illegal alien; then after coming to Canada as a Canadian 
citizen (according to the US and Canadian governments) I've assumed the 
identity of an American so that I can live in Canada as an illegal alien?

Can you tell me even one incentive I would have for pretending to be a 
US citizen living in Canada, considering that I have little to no 
interest in moving back to the US?

How can you not understand why I would want to post your emails on the 
Internet?  You make such wildly entertaining claims; then you defend 
them as though you actually believe them.

Okay, I'm done with you for now.  I shall try to find time to update 
your site soon - I want to display, prominently, on the home page, all 
of the wonderfully racist things you've said in your emails about 
Mexicans and blacks - right there next to your employment and contact 

See ya,

On 04/09/2015 02:17 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
> Richard 
> I enjoy our banter as much as the next person... so long as said 
> person is going through a quadruple root canal without pain medication 
> and multiple broken bones.  That being said, your stalking behavior is 
> really not welcomed.  Unless there is something pertinent pertaining 
> to G*****, I have no desire to receive correspondence from you.  
> Please cease and desist any and all communications that do not fall 
> under the above guidance for communication.  Further, you do not have 
> my permission to use my e-mails, photos, recordings (audio and 
> visual), likeness, or any other item of mine to include but not 
> limited to the website you have put back up.  In other words, stop 
> stalking me... stop posting things online pretending to be me... stop 
> assuming my identity through e-mail and other sources, and take down 
> the domain and foolish website.  (that serves as formal notice)
> Now that we've gotten the pleasantries out of the way, you are 
> correct.  Your name is not Richard... would you prefer I send 
> correspondence to Ricky Steve in the future?  That is your legal 
> name given to you by your birth parents.  I know your father, remember 
> (something that a simple DNA test can resolve). If you are in fact not 
> Richard as you claim, then I suppose you are willfully 
> forfeiting all rights and legal claims to anything pertaining to 
> Richard.  If that is the case, I suppose I shall have to 
> endeavor to find Richard who is G*****'s father.  That is 
> unless you have lawfully and legally changed your name?  I'll 
> entertain your lies for a moment... if the American and Canadian 
> governments wouldn't allow you to use the name Richard any 
> longer, please provide proof of name change and/or identity (ex: birth 
> certificate). Governments are big on process and documentation, so you 
> must have something.
> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Patrick  > wrote:
>     Hello, Desiree.
>     I am thinking, perhaps, you don't understand what the word "alias"
>     means.
>     Being that there is no one at my address with the name "Richard S.
>     ", and being that "Patrick" is my name, not an alias, the
>     only legal course of action in this case would be for me to return
>     the package to the sender. It is, after all, illegal to open or
>     intercept another person's mail. So, I have returned the package,
>     unopened, to the sender (you).
>     Cheers,
>     Patrick