Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: Your loving home and parental teaching and guidance
From: Patrick <>
To: Desiree Capuano <>
Date: Fri, Jan 16 2015 9:39:13 am

Here's something I DID lie to you about: my parental information. But 
that was 14 years ago.

As for the name: there has been no lie.  When we were together I never 
stated that I had or hadn't changed my name.  And you never asked.  I 
never stated that my birth name was or wasn't Richard - and you 
never asked.  You just assumed.  I am not responsible for what you 
assume.  And withholding information is not lying.


On 2015-01-16 7:56 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
> Patrick,
> You are absolutely right, and I could not agree with you more.  The 
> key and initial point here is absolutely about mistrust and lies of a 
> personal nature.  Which I will again point out... You either lied to 
> me about your name initially, or are lieing about it now.  It really 
> makes no difference which, as deceit is deceit.
> That is what the whole point has been all along, actually. I'm glad 
> you have finally caught up with the conversation.  It sure seems to 
> take you a while sometimes, but I guess with anyone who is as 
> disjointed from reality as you are, some considerations need to be made.
> Thank you for finally coming to terms.  It feels good to be correct, 
> doesn't it?
> ~Desiree
> On Friday, January 16, 2015, Patrick  > wrote:
>     Desiree:
>     I would also point out that what's relevant is lies between you
>     and I.  Lies that either of us have told to third parties (e.g.
>     the immigration court) have no bearing on the level of trust
>     between you and I.
>     This is why I have to state the seemingly obvious with you so
>     often.  Sometimes you're just not very smart.
>     Patrick
>     Desiree Capuano      > wrote:
>     Denise,
>     Thanks for playing.  You are and were wrong, and are trying to
>     back-pedal your way out it now.  I'd have thought you were used to
>     being wrong by no, but with what a sore loser you are being.  Your
>     "not lying" in open court must surely be why you were jailed for
>     purgery.  Yup... Makes total sense.
>     Nice that you subconsciously feel so guilty about your lies that
>     you continue to respond.  That and your stalker like
>     obsessive devotion to me.  Let me just saw, "ewww!"  Please try to
>     listen to me when I say that I am not and never will be interested
>     in you.  Ever.
>     I know you love talking to me, but unless you have some actual
>     business pertaining to G*****, You should really go do something
>     productive more productive. Perhaps something other than
>     attempting to reinvent History and reality yet again.
>     ~Desiree
>     On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Patrick
>          > wrote:
>         Desiree:
>         I have a few minutes, so I'll point out another way you're
>         wrong about the alleged lies you've attempted to cite:
>         In 2007, when I stated in the Immigration Court, that my name
>         was Richard, it was, in fact, Richard under the
>         California common law.  All of my ID, issued by the State of
>         California and the State of Arizona had the name Richard 
>         on it and I had been using the name Richard exclusively
>         for the prior 11 years.  It was not until I came to Canada and
>         the Canadian government refused to allow me continue to use
>         the name Richard unless I formally changed it from
>         Patrick and the US government and the State of California
>         also then began refusing to allow me to continue using Richard,
>         that I decided it would be easier to just go back to
>         using Patrick.  So, you see, I didn't lie about my name in
>         the Immigration Court.
>         If the day ever arrives that you are right about something
>         that we're disputing, it will be a special day, indeed.
>         Good day,
>         Patrick
>         On 01/14/2015 08:14 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>         Gary,
>>         I am glad that you have learned how Google and copy paste
>>         work.  That is precious, and I would pat your head like the
>>         good boy that you are if you were here.  A for effort! 
>>         However, you have once again failed to read.  F for
>>         comprehension. The alias is tied to the root of the issue,
>>         which is legal status.  Given that you were actually put in
>>         prison by someone whose job it is to interpret and enforce
>>         laws, you were in non-compliance.  Not only were you wrong as
>>         you are right now, but you were punished for it.  Were you
>>         the catcher?
>>         Further, the request you made of me was to provide a specific
>>         example and evidence that you have been dishonest with me. 
>>         State and other laws are non-applicable and irrelevant to the
>>         discussion at hand.  Have you openly lied?  The answer is
>>         plainly yes.
>>         Your delusions and failure to comprehend complex
>>         thoughts aside, there is actually something relevant for us
>>         to discuss.  G***** would like to attend a 2-day school
>>         camp.  The cost for this is $110 dollars.  If he does not
>>         attend, he will be made to sit in a class and perform
>>         whatever tasks are given to those who could not
>>         attend.  Would you prefer the money go on his debit card or
>>         credit card?  In the absence of a valid response, I will
>>         infer consent for the debit card.
>>         Please don't feel embarrassed for too long as there is good
>>         news!  You are not American. Phwhew!  That must be a huge
>>         relief to you.  I'll forgoe the simple diagram for now, but
>>         if you are still as confused as you seem to be, I'll go ahead
>>         and provide it.
>>         You have most definitely achieved your goal with this thread
>>         if it's purpose was to amuse me and instill a sense of pitty
>>         for you and all those I have shared this with. (The kind of
>>         pitty generally shown to angry kittens.)
>>         All sniping aside, you really should get out in the world and
>>         do something that makes you happy. Make a friend, get laid...
>>         Whatever you need to do to relieve that stress and right your
>>         head again. That may be the first step to you being a better
>>         person.  Or a person at all as you have not provided me
>>         evidence that you are not some form of subhuman.  Like a mole
>>         person.
>>         ~ Desiree
>>         On Tuesday, January 13, 2015, Patrick
>>          wrote:
>>             Desiree:
>>             Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1621, states
>>             as follows:
>>             Whoever—
>>                 (1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal,
>>                 officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the
>>                 United States authorizes an oath to be administered,
>>                 that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify
>>                 truly, or that any written testimony, declaration,
>>                 deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is
>>                 true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or
>>                 subscribes any *material matter* which he does not
>>                 believe to be true; or
>>                 (2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or
>>                 statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under
>>                 section 1746 of title 28, United States Code,
>>                 willfully subscribes as true any material matter
>>                 which he does not believe to be true;
>>                 is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise
>>                 expressly provided by law, be fined under this title
>>                 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This
>>                 section is applicable whether the statement or
>>                 subscription is made within or without the United States.
>>             Do you see the use of the term "material matter" there in
>>             paragraph (1)?  Do you know what "material matter"
>>             means?  It means a matter which is relevant to the issue
>>             at hand.  The issue at hand was whether or not I was a US
>>             citizen.  The name I provided to the court was NOT
>>             material to the question of my citizenship and so, did
>>             not rise to the level of being perjury.  With respect to
>>             my statement to that immigration court that I was, at the
>>             time the statement was made, a US citizen - that was
>>             clearly NOT perjurous as is proven by the fact that the
>>             US government has since provided me my US birth
>>             certificate and the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution
>>             guarantees that any person born within the United States
>>             shall be a citizen of the United States.  SLAM, BITCH!
>>             As for me telling you, that my name was Richard:
>>             Section 1279.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure
>>             states:
>>                 (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), (c), (d),
>>                 or (e), nothing in this title shall be construed to
>>                 abrogate the common law right of any person to change
>>                 his or her name.
>>             Which means that in California any person may change
>>             their name legally under "common law" - in other words,
>>             by adopting a new name.  Which is what I did in 1993 -
>>             1996.  At that time there was no requirement that
>>             government issued ID bear only the name stated on the
>>             person's birth certificate.  Therefore, when we were
>>             together, and prior to the Patriot Act, my legal name
>>             (under California law) was Richard.  And therefore
>>             I did not lie to you at that time.  Again, I saw: Fucking
>>             SLAM!
>>             Section 326 of the Patriot Act improses, amongst many
>>             other things, regulations on financial institutions with
>>             respect to identity documentation required by their
>>             customers.  The regulations require that only the "legal
>>             name" as defined by federal law (not state law) may be
>>             used and that only specific forms of identification may
>>             be used to establish the identity of the account holder. 
>>             From the Patriot Act came the REAL ID act of 2005, which
>>             imposed even stricter requirements on the issuance of
>>             identification documents by the states.  Upon accepting
>>             the REAL ID act California could no longer issue ID with
>>             any name other than that which is on the person's birth
>>             certificate.  This effectively makes California's section
>>             1279.5 irrelevant if a person wants to have any kind of
>>             government issued photo ID.  So, again, you are
>>             completely fucking wrong.
>>             As for me now saying my legal name is Patrick: Since
>>             neither the US government nor the Canadian government
>>             accepts common law name changes any more then they will
>>             only allow me to use the name as it is stated on my birth
>>             certificate - unless I go through the formal, court based
>>             legal name change - which I have no interest in bothering
>>             with.  And so, yet again, I did not lie and your a
>>             fucking idiot!
>>             And your stupid comments about crayons and diagrams just
>>             make you look that much more moronic.  It's people like
>>             you that make me embarrassed to be American.  When people
>>             go on about "stupid Americans" they must be referring to you.
>>             I'm not going to bother with the rest of your message
>>             because you just insist on proving what a misinformed and
>>             ignorant imbecile you are.  Why don't you do a little
>>             research before you provide such stupid, misguided responses.
>>             Anyway, I have flight to catch in the morning so you're
>>             on your own for the rest of the week.  I've accomplished
>>             what I've set out to with this thread so I don't think
>>             there's anything further to say.
>>             Patrick
>>             On 01/13/2015 03:50 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>             José,
>>>             I know this is difficult for you, but please try to
>>>             focus and pay attention here.  Think really hard... Make
>>>             that squinty face you make when that hamster is doing
>>>             his best to move the wheel inside your head.  You asked
>>>             for an example of when you had been dishonest with me. 
>>>             The patriot act has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with the
>>>             conversation.  Further, is not true and does not apply.
>>>             I suppose that sort of logic is why you were thrown in
>>>             prison by a federal judge for perjury.  Perjury happens
>>>             to be a noun.  Perjury is defined as, "the offense of
>>>             willfully telling an untruth in a court after having
>>>             taken an oath of affirmation."  Translation: lying. That
>>>             is another example.  I've now provided you with two
>>>             examples that you requested.  You are welcome.
>>>             Please don't make me break out the crayon diagram as it
>>>             only serves to further degrade you.
>>>             You know what people from the projects and people in
>>>             trailer parks have in common?  They are both... How did
>>>             you put it?  From the lower echelon of society. Though
>>>             the ones who grow up there just never seem to get out of
>>>             the shadow.
>>>             As a disclaimer to keep you from being confused now and
>>>             in the future:  When I do not respond to you in part or
>>>             in whole it means that you are so wrong and delusional
>>>             that it isn't even worth my time to respond.  You'll
>>>             just pull something delusional (likely something you
>>>             yourself are guilty of or feeling guilty about) from
>>>             some orifice and present it as if it were a truth.
>>>             Allow me to apply some Richard logic to this
>>>             conversation.  Do you know why you are spending this
>>>             inordinate amount of time responding to me?  Because
>>>             Cuthulu is masterminding a conspiracy against you to
>>>             force you to initiate pointless conversations with
>>>             someone you obviously hold a high level of contempt (and
>>>             unrequited love) for. aliens.  See?  I
>>>             even tied in your persecution complex.  Again.  You are
>>>             welcome.
>>>             ~Desiree
>>>             On Tuesday, January 13, 2015, Patrick
>>>              wrote:
>>>                 Desiree:
>>>                 I've already explained this to you (and the court)
>>>                 numerous times, but you either have a very short
>>>                 memory or very small comprehension, so I'll explain
>>>                 it again.  Before the passing of the PATRIOT act it
>>>                 was legally acceptable for a person to change their
>>>                 name by assuming a new name and becoming commonly,
>>>                 or generally, known by that name. Having utility
>>>                 bills, pay stubs, et cetera in that new name was
>>>                 sufficient, over time, for that name to become one's
>>>                 "legal name".  So, prior to the passing of the
>>>                 PATRIOT act, Richard was my legal name as the
>>>                 term was defined at that time.  After the passing of
>>>                 the PATRIOT act the various levels of government no
>>>                 longer accepted that as a recognized method changing
>>>                 one's name and, as such, my legal name reverted to
>>>                 my birth name.
>>>                 Therefore, there was no lie and you are, as always,
>>>                 incorrect.
>>>                 You are also incorrect about me growing up in a
>>>                 trailer park.  I grew up in government housing - the
>>>                 projects, not a trailer park.
>>>                 Patrick
>>>                 On 2015-01-13 10:33 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>                 Raymond,
>>>>                 Again, your capacity for transference and random
>>>>                 accusations is truly impressive.  Go ahead and take
>>>>                 that as a compliment if you like.  (But not
>>>>                 something I'm attracted by, so let me be clear.)
>>>>                 Citing evidence with you is pointless, but let's go
>>>>                 with some low hanging fruit.  It is pretty simple,
>>>>                 but I'll go slow so that you can follow.  Please
>>>>                 try to pay attention.  If you truly are Patrick,
>>>>                 you lied about your identity to me,
>>>>                 presented a false name on legal documents. 
>>>>                 Including G*****'s Birth Certificate.  If Patrick
>>>>                 is your fake identity, then you are "being
>>>>                 dishonest" right now.  That was some pretty simple
>>>>                 logic backed by examples.  Let me know if you need
>>>>                 me to diagram in Crayon for you.
>>>>                 As you have repeatedly failed to provide evidence
>>>>                 that you are not a member of a subhuman species
>>>>                 previously thought to be mythical such as a
>>>>                 Morlock, I do not feel that I am required to
>>>>                 respond or read your tantrum further.
>>>>                 What is it like being so wrong and self-assured all
>>>>                 the time?  Does it feel blissful? Does it remind
>>>>                 you of home? You know... The trailer park that you
>>>>                 grew up in?
>>>>                 ~ Desiree
>>>>                 On Monday, January 12, 2015, Patrick
>>>>                  wrote:
>>>>                     Desiree:
>>>>                     You still have not provided any explanation or
>>>>                     cited any references to specific actions on my
>>>>                     part, or provided any supporting evidence for
>>>>                     any of your claims that I am, or have ever,
>>>>                     been dishonest with you.  Until you are able to
>>>>                     do so you should stop making such claims
>>>>                     because you sound like a child in a school yard
>>>>                     shouting "I know you are but what am I".
>>>>                     If you did not inform ICE of my birth name and
>>>>                     that I was born in Florida then that means they
>>>>                     must have already had that information in my
>>>>                     file - which means they knew, officially,
>>>>                     during the time they were holding me in
>>>>                     custody.  Prior to that point I had never
>>>>                     mentioned Florida or the name Patrick to
>>>>                     them. You understand if I choose not to believe
>>>>                     you, right?
>>>>                     To which rabbi do you refer?  I do not
>>>>                     currently have a rabbi with which I confer.  I
>>>>                     shall presume you are not actually referring to
>>>>                     ANY rabbi and are just making stuff up again.
>>>>                     No, I don't cackle.  I don't believe I have
>>>>                     ever cackled.  Cackling is unbecoming.  I use
>>>>                     the terms "destroy" and "ruin" because they are
>>>>                     both vague and innocuous; they convey the
>>>>                     intending meaning without the possibility of
>>>>                     being interpreted as being a threat of physical
>>>>                     harm. If you know of a more appropriate term
>>>>                     feel free to let me know and I shall consider
>>>>                     using it instead.
>>>>                     Now, let's shift the discussion to you.  The
>>>>                     reason you have responded to all of the
>>>>                     messages I have sent over the past day or so,
>>>>                     and that you have done so expeditiously, is
>>>>                     because you know, though you will not openly
>>>>                     admit, that the things I have said are true. 
>>>>                     In particular:
>>>>                     - you've failed to make G***** love and/or
>>>>                     respect you;
>>>>                     - you know G***** still wants to return to
>>>>                     living with me and that the moment he does
>>>>                     return, he will have no interest in maintaining
>>>>                     any further relationship with you;
>>>>                     - you know G***** has not acclimated to your
>>>>                     environment and your way of life and that he
>>>>                     never will;
>>>>                     - you know G***** looks down on you and Sage
>>>>                     as being white trash that is below him;
>>>>                     - you know that these are all things I told you
>>>>                     would happen, long before you took G***** to
>>>>                     Phoenix, and you insisted I was wrong.
>>>>                     The reason you feel compelled to respond to my
>>>>                     statements is because it angers you that I'm
>>>>                     right and I've been right all along and your
>>>>                     pride is hurt because you know that I know that
>>>>                     you're wrong. If you had any amount of
>>>>                     confidence that G***** was happy with you and
>>>>                     that he had even the smallest amount of
>>>>                     affection for you then you would be indifferent
>>>>                     to what I'm saying.
>>>>                     And now, let's talk about this fixation you
>>>>                     have with citizenship.  Why do you keep trying
>>>>                     to make it an issue?  Whether I'm a US citizen
>>>>                     as I say, or a Canadian citizen as you say - do
>>>>                     you think that makes any difference to me?  Or
>>>>                     to where I am or where I live?  Why do you
>>>>                     think that I would have any personal interest
>>>>                     at all in having US citizenship?  If I'm really
>>>>                     not a US citizen I could have gotten US
>>>>                     citizenship when we were together.  Why
>>>>                     wouldn't I have?  Either I have no interest in
>>>>                     being a US citizen or I already am a US
>>>>                     citizen.  Either way, it's clearly not
>>>>                     something that has importance to me, so I don't
>>>>                     understand why you keep trying to use that as a
>>>>                     way to try to insult me.  Moreover, you're
>>>>                     talking about citizenship by virtue of location
>>>>                     of birth - that's such an incredibly arbitrary
>>>>                     factor.  It would take such a small minded
>>>>                     person to think that the geographic location of
>>>>                     a person's birth would have any bearing on who
>>>>                     they are. But then, YOU do think that way,
>>>>                     don't you?  I can only figure that you keep
>>>>                     trying to make citizenship an issue because you
>>>>                     have nothing else that you can try to "hurt" me
>>>>                     with.  That's pretty sad for you.
>>>>                     Let's say, just for the sake of argument, that
>>>>                     I decided I wanted to move back to LA and that
>>>>                     I was a Canadian citizen.  Do you think that
>>>>                     not being a US citizen would stop me? Do you
>>>>                     not think that if I wanted to be living in the
>>>>                     US right now I would be? I mean, even if all of
>>>>                     your claims about me were true, do you think
>>>>                     DHS has the resources to constantly be looking
>>>>                     for non-violent, non-dangerous, white, english
>>>>                     speaking illegals that may or may not be in the
>>>>                     country?  Come on, Desiree, you can't be that
>>>>                     stupid.
>>>>                     Anyway, you can continue to make strange
>>>>                     comments about citizenship if it makes you feel
>>>>                     better. I'm just curious why you keep trying to
>>>>                     insult me by claiming something that is so
>>>>                     plainly irrelevant. It would be like me trying
>>>>                     to insult you by saying you're not really blonde.
>>>>                     Patrick
>>>>                     P.S. You're attempts to insult me with this
>>>>                     name thing fall into the same category as the
>>>>                     citizenship thing - I don't much care whether
>>>>                     you believe my legal name is Patrick or
>>>>                     Richard.  It just doesn't really have any
>>>>                     relevance to anything in my life (what you
>>>>                     believe, I mean).  Feel free to continue
>>>>                     calling me arbitrary names if that helps you
>>>>                     sleep at night.
>>>>                     On 01/12/2015 07:30 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>                     Perry(I assume that is a possible next Alias
>>>>>                     for you),
>>>>>                     Good morning, sunshine! (Again, not a term of
>>>>>                     endearment.)
>>>>>                     I would read the entire novel below, but when
>>>>>                     the first paragraph immediately begins with
>>>>>                     "fun facts" that diverge from reality, I know
>>>>>                     that it isn't worth my time.  I never
>>>>>                     mentioned your false Alias, let alone stated
>>>>>                     it as a factual name to ICE.If you had a
>>>>>                     conversation about that during your
>>>>>                     interrogation for breaking the law and being
>>>>>                     here illegally, then that has nothing to do
>>>>>                     with me.
>>>>>                     I wonder (and so does your Rabbi, by the way)
>>>>>                     if all of your angsty hatred even really
>>>>>                     relates to me at all. Facts and reality seem
>>>>>                     to be relative with you, and it is quite
>>>>>                     troublesome.
>>>>>                     I also wonder... Do you fold your hands and
>>>>>                     cackle malevolently when you talk about
>>>>>                     "destroying" me?It seems a bit over the top;
>>>>>                     much like all of these sad and pathetic emails
>>>>>                     you keep sending me.
>>>>>                     Also, hello to the folks reading at home via
>>>>>                     BCC. Hopefully you all find Ricky/Perry's
>>>>>                     tantrums as amusing and pathetic as I do. :)
>>>>>                     ~Desiree
>>>>>                     On Monday, January 12, 2015, Patrick
>>>>>                      wrote:
>>>>>                         Desiree:
>>>>>                         See, there you go again, making unfounded
>>>>>                         claims against me.  Not only unfounded,
>>>>>                         but contrary to the actual physical
>>>>>                         evidence.  What basis do you have to claim
>>>>>                         that my ID is fake or that it was
>>>>>                         supported by falsified documents?
>>>>>                         Obviously you've made no attempt to verify
>>>>>                         the authenticity of any of them.  You can
>>>>>                         verify the PAL with a quick call to the
>>>>>                         RCMP; you can verify the birth certificate
>>>>>                         with a call to Florida Vital Statistics.
>>>>>                         Hell, you can even call ICE and inquire
>>>>>                         about the status of my case.  Why don't
>>>>>                         you call ICE and inform them that my name
>>>>>                         is actually Patrick?  Oh, you already
>>>>>                         told them that before January 2013 - they
>>>>>                         asked me about it during the
>>>>>                         interrogation.  Do you question the
>>>>>                         validity of the PAL?  Every time I buy a
>>>>>                         handgun or any ammo I have to provide the
>>>>>                         PAL and the store has to verify it with
>>>>>                         the RCMP.  If I have firearms in Canada,
>>>>>                         without a PAL, that's like 15 years in
>>>>>                         prison or some crazy shit.  If you really
>>>>>                         believe the crap that you say then why
>>>>>                         don't you report me to the RCMP?  If the
>>>>>                         PAL is fake then I'll go to prison.  If it
>>>>>                         was obtained with false information then
>>>>>                         it'll be taken away and I'll probably
>>>>>                         still go to prison.
>>>>>                         But you're not going to do that because
>>>>>                         you know you're full of it.  You know my
>>>>>                         ID was obtained legitimately.  And you
>>>>>                         know my true legal, and birth name is
>>>>>                         indeed Patrick.  If you really
>>>>>                         believed it was not then you would have
>>>>>                         tried to have me arrested for whatever
>>>>>                         nonsense you're claiming. And don't say
>>>>>                         you "wouldn't do that to G*****" - of
>>>>>                         course you would - you already have.
>>>>>                         Moreover, if my ID and my PAL was
>>>>>                         fraudulently obtained then that means that
>>>>>                         I am perpetually in the commission of
>>>>>                         numerous felonies...and you knowingly
>>>>>                         allowed G***** to be in my care not only
>>>>>                         while committing those felonies, but while
>>>>>                         illegally transporting, handling and
>>>>>                         operating firearms (illegal if what you
>>>>>                         say is true).
>>>>>                         Don't you see how incredibly stupid you
>>>>>                         keep making yourself look?  I wish I could
>>>>>                         include all the recipients of these
>>>>>                         messages as CC rather than BCC so you can
>>>>>                         see how many people regularly get a good
>>>>>                         laugh at the obtuse things you claim (but
>>>>>                         they've asked not to be disclosed).
>>>>>                         As for calling me Sally: if that makes you
>>>>>                         happy then go for it.  I suppose the
>>>>>                         intention is to suggest I am a woman or
>>>>>                         womanly.  Is that supposed to hurt my
>>>>>                         feelings?  How 'bout if you call me
>>>>>                         Vickie, instead?  I kind of like Vickie
>>>>>                         better than Sally.
>>>>>                         Again, you accuse me of "regularly"
>>>>>                         spouting lies.  I recall challenging you
>>>>>                         on that numerous times and you failing to
>>>>>                         be able to actually present any cases of
>>>>>                         me lying.  Has that changed?  Can you
>>>>>                         actually recall a specific instance of me
>>>>>                         lying?  Are you going to say I lied in
>>>>>                         court when I said my name is Patrick? 
>>>>>                         So, I provide physical proof that that IS
>>>>>                         my legal name and you say that the
>>>>>                         documents are forged?  Get real!
>>>>>                         As for "subjective opinions": all opinions
>>>>>                         are subjective - that's kind of what makes
>>>>>                         them opinions. Otherwise, they'd be
>>>>>                         facts.  And you were actually able to
>>>>>                         graduate with a bachelors degree? Oh,
>>>>>                         right, from the University of
>>>>>                         Phoenix...not from a REAL university. I'm
>>>>>                         sorry.
>>>>>                         So, government issued photo ID is not
>>>>>                         acceptable as proof of identity to you? 
>>>>>                         Well, it's good enough for the RCMP, and
>>>>>                         it's good enough for US Border Patrol,
>>>>>                         ICE, and the TSA.  So, I guess you're shit
>>>>>                         outta luck there.
>>>>>                         I don't get lonely. I don't use drugs or
>>>>>                         get high.
>>>>>                         Why do you tell me to grow up?  In what
>>>>>                         way am I acting immaturely?  It seems, on
>>>>>                         my end, I'm just having a calm, rational
>>>>>                         discussion.  It seems to me that you're
>>>>>                         the one getting worked up and flinging
>>>>>                         irrelevant, unfounded allegations like a
>>>>>                         child.
>>>>>                         Why do you end your email with a
>>>>>                         declaration that there is no affection
>>>>>                         intended? Do you think I might not be
>>>>>                         aware of that?  Do you think I have
>>>>>                         anything but disgust for you and people
>>>>>                         like you (trashy, ghetto recipients)?  It
>>>>>                         almost seems more like you're trying to
>>>>>                         convince yourself of the things you say,
>>>>>                         than anybody else.
>>>>>                         Let me tell you a story about something
>>>>>                         that happened on G*****'s latest visit. 
>>>>>                         I noticed, since he's been with you he's
>>>>>                         picked up some trashy habits. Lately, when
>>>>>                         he's eating, he's been picking his teeth
>>>>>                         with his fingernail - a truly revolting
>>>>>                         white trash mannerism. Normally, I try to
>>>>>                         break him of trashy habits right away, but
>>>>>                         I didn't want to seem nagging so I kept
>>>>>                         silent.  Then, a few days later, we were
>>>>>                         watch Family Guy and Lois was doing that
>>>>>                         during dinner, and Stewie said to Brian
>>>>>                         how disgusting she was, picking her teeth
>>>>>                         with her finger right there are the
>>>>>                         table.  Talking down to her for being all
>>>>>                         trashy.  G***** immediately broke that
>>>>>                         habit.  A couple days later I asked him if
>>>>>                         it was because of what Stewie said - you
>>>>>                         smiled and said yeah.  You see, it's not
>>>>>                         just me manipulating G***** against you -
>>>>>                         it's also Seth Macfarlane and Stewie and
>>>>>                         everyone else that hates white trash
>>>>>                         people.  You're just so gross.
>>>>>                         Let me point out something obvious to you:
>>>>>                         you are in what is called, in legal terms,
>>>>>                         the "superior position" because G***** is
>>>>>                         in your custody and you have complete
>>>>>                         authority over all matters pertaining to
>>>>>                         him. The fact that you still get so worked
>>>>>                         up over what I say or what's going on in
>>>>>                         my life, and that you still feel the need
>>>>>                         to make claims like my ID is all fake, and
>>>>>                         calling me girl's names, is a pretty darn
>>>>>                         strong indication that either A) you've
>>>>>                         got serious mental problems, or B) you're
>>>>>                         the one that won't let go. Remember when
>>>>>                         we last spoke on the phone?  Who was the
>>>>>                         one that was yelling and throwing
>>>>>                         accusations?  Who's the one that hang up? 
>>>>>                         Not me.  I was calm and indifferent.
>>>>>                         Because I don't really care about you.  I
>>>>>                         enjoy this email correspondence because it
>>>>>                         creates a written record for me to
>>>>>                         publish.  One day Sage will be able to go
>>>>>                         on the Internet and read them.  Every time
>>>>>                         you apply for a job or meet a guy that you
>>>>>                         like, I'll be there to make sure they're
>>>>>                         fully informed of who you really are. 
>>>>>                         That is why I engage you in these
>>>>>                         delightful conversations.
>>>>>                         Patrick
>>>>>                         P.S. When making your ridiculous claims
>>>>>                         about me you should remember that what
>>>>>                         other people are thinking is "Yeah, but
>>>>>                         you married the guy and had a kid with
>>>>>                         him. What does that say about you?" 
>>>>>                         You're really not too bright, are you?
>>>>>                         On 01/11/2015 10:08 PM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>                         I'm still not sure what your current fake
>>>>>>                         ID supported by falsified documents
>>>>>>                         happens to be, so I will address you as
>>>>>>                         Sally.
>>>>>>                         Sally,
>>>>>>                         I would genuinely address your response
>>>>>>                         if it had any merit, or purpose other
>>>>>>                         than to allow you to lash out like the
>>>>>>                         impotent child that you constantly prove
>>>>>>                         yourself to be.
>>>>>>                         However, considering you regularly spout
>>>>>>                         outright lies and subjective opinions as
>>>>>>                         fact with no true supporting evidence or
>>>>>>                         basis in reality, (likely when you are
>>>>>>                         drunk and/or high and lonely) I will
>>>>>>                         simply show your thoughts the amount of
>>>>>>                         consideration they deserve.
>>>>>>                         Grow up, and have a nice night Sally.
>>>>>>                         Regards (of some sort) (but again, not
>>>>>>                         affection... Don't misunderstand),
>>>>>>                         Desiree
>>>>>>                         On Sunday, January 11, 2015, Patrick
>>>>>>                          wrote:
>>>>>>                             As always, I shall address each of
>>>>>>                             your statements and point out, as
>>>>>>                             plainly as possible, why/how it is wrong.
>>>>>>                             On 01/11/2015 12:54 PM, Desiree
>>>>>>                             Capuano wrote:
>>>>>>>                             Ricky / Richard / Morgan / Parick /
>>>>>>>                             Patricia / Susan / whatever your
>>>>>>>                             chosen alias is today,
>>>>>>                             I don't get your intended implication
>>>>>>                             here.  How is my first name, whether
>>>>>>                             assumed or legal, relevant to
>>>>>>                             anything in my previous message and,
>>>>>>                             in particular, whether I am on
>>>>>>                             schedule with my plan against you? An
>>>>>>                             insult is much more effective when
>>>>>>                             the intended recipient is able to
>>>>>>                             infer the reference. Please clarify.
>>>>>>>                             Are you bored or something?
>>>>>>                             Bored: no.  Or something: vague and
>>>>>>                             ambiguous. Please be more specific.
>>>>>>>                             Your stalker-like obsession with me
>>>>>>>                             is truly impressive. The amount of
>>>>>>>                             time and energy spent thinking of me
>>>>>>>                             is flattering, but honestly a little
>>>>>>>                             pathetic.
>>>>>>                             If there is any sincerity in your
>>>>>>                             statements then you have grossly
>>>>>>                             misinterpreted my intentions.  I was
>>>>>>                             pretty direct when I told Detective
>>>>>>                             Tuchfarber that my intention was to
>>>>>>                             do everything in my power and
>>>>>>                             capabilities to make your life as
>>>>>>                             miserable as possible, and, if
>>>>>>                             possible, to the point that you
>>>>>>                             ultimately commit suicide.  That
>>>>>>                             would be my ultimate desire.  But
>>>>>>                             before you reach that point it is
>>>>>>                             imperative that you experience as
>>>>>>                             much misery, disappointment, and
>>>>>>                             suffering as possible first.  At this
>>>>>>                             point in your life you have very
>>>>>>                             little to lose so there is not much
>>>>>>                             incentive for me to actively publish
>>>>>>                             your information. I shall wait,
>>>>>>                             patiently, until you rise up a bit,
>>>>>>                             THEN proceed with the billboard
>>>>>>                             campaign around Phoenix; I'll wait
>>>>>>                             until you actually have some
>>>>>>                             financial significance, THEN publish
>>>>>>                             your complete credit and financial
>>>>>>                             history - including your social
>>>>>>                             security number and birth certificate
>>>>>>                             (not illegal as long as it's done
>>>>>>                             outside the US).
>>>>>>                             I don't see how you could interpret
>>>>>>                             such intentions as being misguided
>>>>>>                             affection.
>>>>>>>                             For someone who so strongly espouses
>>>>>>>                             logic and intelligence, I would
>>>>>>>                             think that you could have grasped
>>>>>>>                             that I am not interested in you.
>>>>>>>                             Especially since I have directly
>>>>>>>                             told you that I am not interested in
>>>>>>>                             you.
>>>>>>                             Whether or not you are interested in
>>>>>>                             me is not relevant to my objectives.
>>>>>>>                             I realize that I am really amazing,
>>>>>>>                             but please expend some of that
>>>>>>>                             energy towards finding a man / woman
>>>>>>>                             / inanimate object that is capable
>>>>>>>                             of coping with your delusional
>>>>>>>                             nature, and providing some small
>>>>>>>                             measure of happiness.
>>>>>>                             I see no evidence to suggest there is
>>>>>>                             any merit to your implication that I
>>>>>>                             am delusional. If you know of any
>>>>>>                             then please cite them. Otherwise
>>>>>>                             you're just talking gibberish again.
>>>>>>>                             Everyone has a right to the pursuit
>>>>>>>                             of happiness. Though that is a
>>>>>>>                             founding principal of America, so I
>>>>>>>                             understand it being foreign to a
>>>>>>>                             Canadian citizen like yourself.
>>>>>>                             Almost every country in the world
>>>>>>                             includes in their respective
>>>>>>                             constitutions and/or bill of rights
>>>>>>                             the right to the pursuit of
>>>>>>                             happiness.  I wish I could say it is
>>>>>>                             because you are an ignorant American
>>>>>>                             that you do not realize that, but
>>>>>>                             that fact that you were born on US
>>>>>>                             soil has nothing to do with the fact
>>>>>>                             that you are clearly ignorant.
>>>>>>                             You again bring up the question of
>>>>>>                             citizenship. Why?  You are the only
>>>>>>                             one pretending to still cling to that
>>>>>>                             claim. When I show up at border
>>>>>>                             crossings with my US birth
>>>>>>                             certificate and BC photo ID US
>>>>>>                             customs and ICE don't even give me a
>>>>>>                             second thought.
>>>>>>                             But, I'll play along, for the sake of
>>>>>>                             argument: Let's assume your claim
>>>>>>                             that I am a Canadian citizen is
>>>>>>                             true.  So? What's your point?  Are
>>>>>>                             you trying to suggest that a person
>>>>>>                             born on US soil is inherently
>>>>>>                             superior to someone who wasn't?  By
>>>>>>                             that logic then Lauchner and Michael
>>>>>>                             Capuano are automatically superior to
>>>>>>                             me.  Charles Manson, Ted Bundy and
>>>>>>                             Richard Ramirez are superior to every
>>>>>>                             single person ever born in Canada?
>>>>>>                             That's some pretty sketchy reasoning.
>>>>>>                             And let's pretend for a moment that I
>>>>>>                             AM a Canadian citizen: that hasn't,
>>>>>>                             and still doesn't prevent me from
>>>>>>                             living in the US.  I own a business
>>>>>>                             in the US.  So, again, what are you
>>>>>>                             trying to imply?
>>>>>>>                             Your obsessive pursuit of my
>>>>>>>                             attention seems to only pale in
>>>>>>>                             comparison to your capacity for
>>>>>>>                             delusional transference, and cruelty
>>>>>>>                             towards G*****.
>>>>>>                             Again, you're making claims about my
>>>>>>                             psychological state without citing a
>>>>>>                             single case of me ever exhibiting
>>>>>>                             delusional behavior.  At least when I
>>>>>>                             call you delusional I refer your to a
>>>>>>                             specific thing you did which supports
>>>>>>                             my claim.
>>>>>>>                             It is unfortunate that you chose to
>>>>>>>                             rob G***** of his right and
>>>>>>>                             opportunity to choose for himself
>>>>>>>                             which parent to live with.
>>>>>>                             Come again?  I was the one initially
>>>>>>                             requested G***** be interviewed by
>>>>>>                             the court so he can tell the court
>>>>>>                             where he wants to live.  You then
>>>>>>                             attempted to circumvent that by
>>>>>>                             having me deported. I then ordered my
>>>>>>                             attorney to request the court put the
>>>>>>                             interview back on calendar. Then,
>>>>>>                             when G***** was given the chance, he
>>>>>>                             clearly, explicitly, and very
>>>>>>                             unequivocally told the court he wants
>>>>>>                             to return to live with me.
>>>>>>                             See that? That is a case of you
>>>>>>                             exhibiting delusional behavior.
>>>>>>                             You're accusing ME of doing exactly
>>>>>>                             what you have, and continue to do. 
>>>>>>                             THAT's delusional.
>>>>>>>                             You relinquished all rights a mere 2
>>>>>>>                             months from his 14th birthday where
>>>>>>>                             he would have been able to declare
>>>>>>>                             his choice in front of everyone in
>>>>>>>                             open court.
>>>>>>                             I relinquished my rights so that I
>>>>>>                             can remove the court from the
>>>>>>                             equation.  So that I can proceed with
>>>>>>                             my plans respecting you.  It's hard
>>>>>>                             to do that when I have to maintain
>>>>>>                             appearances for the court.
>>>>>>                             You are unsurprisingly misinformed
>>>>>>                             about the significance of G*****
>>>>>>                             turning 14. There is no statutory
>>>>>>                             age, in either California or Arizona,
>>>>>>                             at which the court is required to
>>>>>>                             grant the child the living
>>>>>>                             arrangement the child desires.  It is
>>>>>>                             completely at the discretion of the
>>>>>>                             court. "Generally" after the age of
>>>>>>                             14 the court will "listen" to what
>>>>>>                             the child wants - but that's the
>>>>>>                             extent of the law on the matter.
>>>>>>                             I also point out, waiving one's
>>>>>>                             rights does not mean refusing one's
>>>>>>                             responsibilities. Though you seem to
>>>>>>                             think they are one and the same. I
>>>>>>                             did not refuse to allow G***** to
>>>>>>                             return to live with me - I created a
>>>>>>                             situation where he can see,
>>>>>>                             firsthand, what you would be like in
>>>>>>                             the absense of the court compelling
>>>>>>                             you to act.  And so far you've played
>>>>>>                             right into it.
>>>>>>>                             It doesn't surprise me given your
>>>>>>>                             repeated underestimation of his
>>>>>>>                             intelligence and potential; simply
>>>>>>>                             seeing him as a pawn and tool to use
>>>>>>>                             in your obsessive quest to win me
>>>>>>>                             back. ("destroy me" ... Whatever you
>>>>>>>                             want to call it.)
>>>>>>                             As I have explained to him:
>>>>>>                             sometimes, to get the desired
>>>>>>                             outcome, we have to go through a
>>>>>>                             period of challenges. That is what he
>>>>>>                             is going through right now.  I
>>>>>>                             believe the exact idiom I used was
>>>>>>                             "Sometimes, to make an omlette you
>>>>>>                             have to break a few eggs".
>>>>>>                             I explained what that meant and how
>>>>>>                             it applied to the current situation. 
>>>>>>                             He acknowledged understanding.
>>>>>>>                             I love G***** regardless of what
>>>>>>>                             decision he should ultimately make.
>>>>>>                             If that is the case then why do you
>>>>>>                             insist on not allowing him to make
>>>>>>                             that decision?  He already has: he
>>>>>>                             said he wants to come and live with
>>>>>>                             me.  He has expressed that if he
>>>>>>                             never heard from you again he's fine
>>>>>>                             with that.
>>>>>>                             It's already been more than 2
>>>>>>                             years...what do you believe is going
>>>>>>                             to happen?  Do you think one day he's
>>>>>>                             going to wake up and realize that he
>>>>>>                             was wrong all this time and suddenly
>>>>>>                             love you unconditionally? Again, I
>>>>>>                             say, THAT is delusional! Dude, the
>>>>>>                             fact that since the July hearing,
>>>>>>                             since you've gotten full custody and
>>>>>>                             authority over him he has steadily
>>>>>>                             withdrawn from you and that other kid
>>>>>>                             of yours should tell you something.
>>>>>>                             Before that he could hold on to the
>>>>>>                             hope that at the next hearing the
>>>>>>                             court would order you to return him. 
>>>>>>                             That hope is gone. I really don't
>>>>>>                             know what you are hoping for, but
>>>>>>                             your relationship with G***** has
>>>>>>                             reached it's peak and the only place
>>>>>>                             it's going from here is down. 
>>>>>>                             There's less than two years until he
>>>>>>                             can legally move out and I'm willing
>>>>>>                             to bet that within 24 hours of
>>>>>>                             turning 16 you'll never hear from him
>>>>>>                             again.
>>>>>>                             As for "love": unless you can provide
>>>>>>                             a clear definition of what the word
>>>>>>                             means then you should refrain from
>>>>>>                             using it.
>>>>>>>                             I know he is capable of so much, and
>>>>>>>                             will support him down whatever path
>>>>>>>                             he should ultimately choose in
>>>>>>>                             whatever capacity I am able. I may
>>>>>>>                             be hard on G***** sometimes, but
>>>>>>>                             being a real parent means looking
>>>>>>>                             out for the physical, mental, and
>>>>>>>                             emotional well being of your child
>>>>>>>                             even when it isn't easy or popular.
>>>>>>                             You are completely oblivious to
>>>>>>                             anything going on with G*****.  I
>>>>>>                             just spoke to him on the phone - you
>>>>>>                             still haven't even noticed the
>>>>>>                             anomoly in his eye.  You live in the
>>>>>>                             same house with him and he's been
>>>>>>                             back for 8 days and you haven't
>>>>>>                             noticed.  You also didn't notice it
>>>>>>                             before he came up here.  How can you
>>>>>>                             not notice a bright discoloration in
>>>>>>                             his eye? Do you not speak with him? 
>>>>>>                             Do you not look him in the eye when
>>>>>>                             you do (assuming you do speak with him)?
>>>>>>                             You add him to your insurance but you
>>>>>>                             don't bother taking him to the doctor
>>>>>>                             or the dentist (you only do it when
>>>>>>                             you think I'm going to bring it up in
>>>>>>                             court). Dental cleaning and checkups
>>>>>>                             are supposed to be every 6 months,
>>>>>>                             not every 12.  He wasn't in the habit
>>>>>>                             of using deodarant - I had to point
>>>>>>                             out to him one day that he smelled of
>>>>>>                             BO.  He still often "forgets" to
>>>>>>                             brush his teeth.  He doesn't know how
>>>>>>                             to get from your place to the Target,
>>>>>>                             which is only a few blocks away. When
>>>>>>                             given the choice of doing the
>>>>>>                             research to figure out how to get to
>>>>>>                             the outdoor shooting range, or not
>>>>>>                             go, he chose not to do the research. 
>>>>>>                             Is that the result of your "real
>>>>>>                             parenting"?
>>>>>>>                             I can only hope that one day you
>>>>>>>                             decide to strive to be a better
>>>>>>>                             person, and better parent.
>>>>>>                             I strive, on a daily basis, to
>>>>>>                             improve myself.  I strive to be
>>>>>>                             objective and fair, and to be
>>>>>>                             reasonable and rational. I consider
>>>>>>                             myself to be fair and decent.  The
>>>>>>                             people I come in contact with,
>>>>>>                             exclusive of you, of course, also
>>>>>>                             consider me such.
>>>>>>                             You're still making the same
>>>>>>                             unfounded arguments that you've been
>>>>>>                             making since 2011.  You're the one
>>>>>>                             that has to use underhanded tactics
>>>>>>                             and false claims to get what you
>>>>>>                             want.  I'm referring to you resorting
>>>>>>                             to calling ICE in order to gain
>>>>>>                             custody by default. See, when
>>>>>>                             G*****'s with me he's with me
>>>>>>                             because he *wants* to be.  I've never
>>>>>>                             once had to force him or tell him he
>>>>>>                             has to visit because the court
>>>>>>                             ordered it.  You, on the other hand,
>>>>>>                             have done exactly that.  You claim to
>>>>>>                             want what's best for G*****, yet you
>>>>>>                             teach him nothing. You think hugs and
>>>>>>                             kisses will make everything okay
>>>>>>                             (again, that's delusional).
>>>>>>                             It is my opinion that if anyone needs
>>>>>>                             to work on being a better person it
>>>>>>                             is you.
>>>>>>>                             If not for yourself, for G*****'s
>>>>>>>                             sake.
>>>>>>                             Both I, and G*****, are happy with
>>>>>>                             who I am, with how I behave, with my
>>>>>>                             values and beliefs.  If I identify a
>>>>>>                             character or personality flaw in
>>>>>>                             myself then I will commit to
>>>>>>                             improving it.
>>>>>>                             You act the same now as you did in
>>>>>>                             2000.  You still try to use people's
>>>>>>                             guilt and pitty to manipulate them. 
>>>>>>                             You tell people half truths and
>>>>>>                             versions of events which are heavily
>>>>>>                             skewed in your favor, to gain their
>>>>>>                             support. That's deceptive. That's
>>>>>>                             completely contrary to how I try to
>>>>>>                             live and how I try to guide G*****. 
>>>>>>                             You can deny that you do that until
>>>>>>                             you're blue in the face but I've got
>>>>>>                             over 400 emails from you and/or about
>>>>>>                             you where you've done that countless
>>>>>>                             times.
>>>>>>                             You rush into relationships with
>>>>>>                             losers like Lauchner and Capuano, you
>>>>>>                             move in with them, you hastily have
>>>>>>                             children with them.  You expose your
>>>>>>                             children to people like Lauchner and
>>>>>>                             tell them he's a good, wonderful
>>>>>>                             person.  You allow him to take on a
>>>>>>                             paternal role in their lives.  You
>>>>>>                             defend his behavior and get angry
>>>>>>                             when people state facts about him. 
>>>>>>                             Yet you want to pretend you're a good,