I am sorry that you are unable to understand.
Have a nice day. :)
On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Patrick wrote:
> I am attempting to obtain some type of guideline, some rule which I may
> use to determine what kinds of things G***** is "permitted" under your
> totalitarian regime, to possess while he is in your home so that I don't
> need to bother with begging for your approval on an individual basis. Over
> the past few months you have ignored almost all of my requests regarding
> whether G***** would be permitted to have specific items (for example, an
> upgraded notebook, a MacBook).
> Regarding the PS4, how could I possibly know that that would be on the
> "forbidden" list? You never actually stated, prior to this, that it
> was...and you permitted him to have the one I got him for his last
> birthday. So, why was he allowed to have one last year, but not this
> year? What is the logic? That is why I would like something in writing:
> there is no logic, no reasoning, and no consistency to your decisions. You
> change your mind from one day to the next and don't even provide a
> justification for the change.
> May you please clarify the significance of the interjection "Period" at
> the end of your previous message? It immediately follows an actual period,
> so it seems somewhat redundant. But, moreover, it is not followed by an
> exclamation mark, so it is clearly not intended for emphasis. I protest
> you are the one being vague!
> On 2014-09-09 8:06 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
> You asked the question, so you obviously have something specific in
> mind. Cut to the chase here. I am under no obligation to furnish you with
> a list of allowed items in my home. Nor am I under any obligation to
> discuss rules relating to parenting of G***** with you. Especially since
> you willingly relinquished all parental rights.
> If G***** wishes to have a conversation with me directly, that is his
> right, and I fully encourage that open dialogue.
> If you are attempting to be vague in an effort to skirt a known
> prohibited item, let me help you be direct. If this discussion is
> focused around a Playstation 4, you know that answer is no. Period.
> On Monday, September 8, 2014, Patrick <_e>> wrote:
>> May you please provide G***** and me a list, or at least examples, of
>> what types of items which would not be "allowed" in your house?
>> On 09/08/2014 08:21 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>> G***** can SPEND the money you give him on whatever he wishes. However,
>> that does not guarantee any sort of results.
>> For example: Should G***** choose purchase something that is not
>> allowed in the house, he would need to consider the logistics of where/how
>> to store said item to protect it from factors such as theft and weather.
>> Though I'm not sure that buried treasure and maps would prove as effective
>> in today's society as it once did. Especially if that something is a puppy.
>> On Sunday, September 7, 2014, Patrick
>>> I put this request in a separate email so that your response does not
>>> get mixed in with the other matter we are currently discussing.
>>> Have you imposed upon G***** any restrictions, or limitations, on how
>>> he may spend the financial support I have been providing him?