Mail

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Desiree Capuano & James Pendleton
250 E. Placita Lago Del Mago
Sahuarita, AZ     85629
Tel: 520-288-8200
desiree.capuano@gmail.com
japendletonjr@gmail.com
Back to Mailbox Back to mailbox
Newer Message Newer message
Older Message Older message
Re: Restrictions on G*****'s use of the financial support
From: Desiree Capuano <desiree.capuano@gmail.com>
To: Patrick <patrick@desireecapuano.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 09 2014 12:05:06 pm
Richard,

I am sorry that you are unable to understand.

Have a nice day. :)

On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Patrick  wrote:

>  Desiree:
>
> I am attempting to obtain some type of guideline, some rule which I may
> use to determine what kinds of things G***** is "permitted" under your
> totalitarian regime, to possess while he is in your home so that I don't
> need to bother with begging for your approval on an individual basis.  Over
> the past few months you have ignored almost all of my requests regarding
> whether G***** would be permitted to have specific items (for example, an
> upgraded notebook, a MacBook).
>
> Regarding the PS4, how could I possibly know that that would be on the
> "forbidden" list?  You never actually stated, prior to this, that it
> was...and you permitted him to have the one I got him for his last
> birthday.  So, why was he allowed to have one last year, but not this
> year?  What is the logic?  That is why I would like something in writing:
> there is no logic, no reasoning, and no consistency to your decisions.  You
> change your mind from one day to the next and don't even provide a
> justification for the change.
>
> May you please clarify the significance of the interjection "Period" at
> the end of your previous message?  It immediately follows an actual period,
> so it seems somewhat redundant.  But, moreover, it is not followed by an
> exclamation mark, so it is clearly not intended for emphasis.  I protest
> you are the one being vague!
>
> Patrick
>
> On 2014-09-09 8:06 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>
> Richard,
>
>  You asked the question, so you obviously have something specific in
> mind.  Cut to the chase here.  I am under no obligation to furnish you with
> a list of allowed items in my home.  Nor am I under any obligation to
> discuss rules relating to parenting of G***** with you.  Especially since
> you willingly relinquished all parental rights.
>
>  If G***** wishes to have a conversation with me directly, that is his
> right, and I fully encourage that open dialogue.
>
>  If you are attempting to be vague in an effort to skirt a known
> prohibited item, let me help you be direct.  If this discussion is
> focused around a Playstation 4, you know that answer is no.  Period.
>
>
> On Monday, September 8, 2014, Patrick  > wrote:
>
>>
>> May you please provide G***** and me a list, or at least examples, of
>> what types of items which would not be "allowed" in your house?
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>> On 09/08/2014 08:21 AM, Desiree Capuano wrote:
>>
>> G***** can SPEND the money you give him on whatever he wishes.  However,
>> that does not guarantee any sort of results.
>>
>>  For example: Should G***** choose purchase something that is not
>> allowed in the house, he would need to consider the logistics of where/how
>> to store said item to protect it from factors such as theft and weather.
>>  Though I'm not sure that buried treasure and maps would prove as effective
>> in today's society as it once did.  Especially if that something is a puppy.
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, September 7, 2014, Patrick 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Desiree:
>>>
>>> I put this request in a separate email so that your response does not
>>> get mixed in with the other matter we are currently discussing.
>>>
>>> Have you imposed upon G***** any restrictions, or limitations, on how
>>> he may spend the financial support I have been providing him?
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>
>>
>